1887
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

In this work we present a methodology for optimal management of brownfields that is illustrated on a real field. The approach does not depend on the particular reservoir flow simulator used, although streamline-derived information is leveraged to accelerate the optimization. The method allows one to include (non-linear) constraints (e.g. a recovery factor larger than a given baseline value), which are very often challenging to address with optimization tools. We rely on derivative-free optimization coupled with the filter method for non-linear constraints, although the methodology can also be combined with approaches that utilize exact/approximate gradients. Performance in terms of wall-clock time can be improved further if distributed-computing resources are available (the method is amenable to parallel implementation). The methodology is showcased using a real field in west Siberia where net present value (NPV) is maximized subject to a constraint for the recovery factor. The optimization variables represent a discrete time series for well bottom-hole pressure over a fraction of the production time frame. An increase in NPV of 7.9% is obtained with respect to an existing baseline. The optimization methods studied include local optimization algorithms (e.g. generalized pattern search) and global search procedures (e.g. particle swarm optimization). The controls for one injection well in the real field were actually modified according to the solution determined in this work. The results obtained suggest improvement for most economic scenarios.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2018-022
2018-10-08
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audet, C. & Dennis, J.E., Jr.
    2002. Analysis of generalized pattern searches. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 13, 889–903.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Batycky, R.P. & Thiele, M.R.
    2006. Using streamline-derived injection efficiencies for improved waterflood management. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 9, 187–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellout, M.C., Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Durlofsky, L.J., Foss, B. & Kleppe, J.
    2012. Joint optimization of oil well placement and controls. Computational Geosciences, 16, 1061–1079.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Conn, A.R., Scheinberg, K. & Vicente, L.N.
    2009. Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Datta-Gupta, A., Alhuthali, A.H.H., Yuen, B. & Fontanilla, J.
    2010. Field applications of waterflood optimization via optimal rate control with smart wells. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 13, 406–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehdari, V. & Oliver, D.S.
    2012. Sequential quadratic programming for solving constrained production optimization – Case study from Brugge field. SPE Journal, 17, 874–884.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eberhart, R.C. & Kennedy, J.
    1995. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micromachine and Human Science. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Isebor, O.J. & Durlofsky, L.J.
    2011a. Application of derivative-free methodologies to generally constrained oil production optimisation problems. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 2, 134–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Mukerji, T. & Durlofsky, L.J.
    2011b. Derivative-free optimization for oil field operations. In: Koziel, S. & Yang, S.-X. (eds) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 356. Springer, Berlin, 19–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S. & Toint, P.L.
    2006. A Brief History of Filter Methods. Technical Report ANL/MCS/JA-58300. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harding, T.J., Radcliffe, N.J. & King, P.R.
    1998. Hydrocarbon production scheduling with genetic algorithms. SPE Journal, 3, 99–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Humphries, T.D., Haynes, R.D. & James, L.A.
    2014. Simultaneous and sequential approaches to joint optimization of well placement and control. Computational Geosciences, 18, 433–448.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Isebor, O.J., Durlofsky, L.J. & Echeverría Ciaurri, D.
    2014. A derivative-free methodology with local and global search for the constrained joint optimization of well locations and controls. Computational Geosciences, 18, 463–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jansen, J.D. & Durlofsky, L.J.
    2017. Use of reduced-order models in well control optimization. Optimization and Engineering, 18, 105–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelly, J.E., III & Hamm, S.
    2013. Smart Machines: IBM's Watson and the Era of Cognitive Computing. Columbia University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R.C.
    1995. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN ’95. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, 1942–1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolda, T.G., Lewis, R.M. & Torczon, V.
    2003. Optimization by direct search: New perspectives on some classical and modern methods. SIAM Review, 45, 385–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koziel, S., Echeverría Ciaurri, D. & Leifsson, L.
    2011. Surrogate-based methods. In: Koziel, S. & Yang, S.-X. (eds) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 356. Springer, Berlin, 33–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kramer, O., Echeverría Ciaurri, D. & Koziel, S.
    2011. Derivative-free optimization. In: Koziel, S. & Yang, S.-X. (eds) Computational Optimization, Methods and Algorithms. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 356. Springer, Berlin, 61–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nocedal, J. & Wright, S.
    2006. Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Onwunalu, J. & Durlofsky, L.J.
    2010. Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type. Computational Geosciences, 14, 183–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sarma, P., Chen, W.H., Durlofsky, L.J. & Aziz, K.
    2008. Production optimization with adjoint models under nonlinear control-state path inequality constraints. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11, 326–339.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Su, H.J. & Oliver, D.S.
    2010. Smart well production optimization using an ensemble-based method. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 13, 884–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Torczon, V.
    1997. On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 7, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Essen, G., Jansen, J.D., Brouwer, R., Douma, S.G., Zandvliet, M., Rollett, K.I. & Harris, D.
    2010. Optimization of smart wells in the St. Joseph field. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 13, 588–595.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Essen, G., Van den Hof, P.M.J. & Jansen, J.D.
    2011. Hierarchical long-term and short-term production optimization. SPE Journal, 16, 191–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Voznyuk, A.S., Rykov, A.I. & Kotov, V.S.
    2014. Multi-criteria analysis and optimization of waterflood systems in brown fields. Paper SPE 171229 presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration and Technical Conference and Exhibition, 14–16 October 2014, Moscow, Russia.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, H., Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Durlofsky, L.J. & Cominelli, A.
    2012. Optimal well placement under uncertainty using a retrospective optimization framework. SPE Journal, 17, 112–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wen, T., Thiele, M.R., Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Aziz, K. & Ye, Y.
    2014. Waterflood management using two-stage optimization with streamline simulation. Computational Geosciences, 18, 483–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao, H., Chen, C., Do, S., Oliveira, D., Li, G. & Reynolds, A.
    2013. Maximization of a dynamic quadratic interpolation model for production optimization. SPE Journal, 18, 1012–1025.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2018-022
Loading
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2018-022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error