1887

Abstract

Abstract

Many tight and shale-oil gas reservoirs are being explored in Argentina to increase local hydrocarbon production. As known, hydrocarbon resources in the Neuquén basin are massive; however, many are far from being developed to the degree that they can be called resources. Significant work has yet to be done to make this happen.

It is also well known that large areas in the Neuquén basin are under strike-slip stress conditions that may be a strong influence on stimulation effectiveness. After analyzing the production results of several wells and their associated oil/gas fields, a hypothesis was developed that suggests a possible relationship between the tectonic framework and the location of successful wells. This hypothesis might not only explain the productivity results of some wells to Vaca Muerta shale and other tight reservoirs, but also could help in locations of new wells to help reduce investment risks and improve productivity.

This analysis compares aspects from structural geology, petrophysics, and completion descriptions observed in different fields to productivity results. Information included in this paper is sufficient to improve understanding of the conditions for a good or bad well based on this hypothesis; therefore, these lessons can be applied to generate conclusions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.2118/167707-MS
2014-02-25
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bettini, E.H.
    1984. Pautas sobre cronología estructural en el área del Cerro Lotena, Cerro Granito y su implicancia en el significado de la dorsal del Neuquèn, provincia del Neuquèn. IX Congreso Geológico Argentino, actas 2: 342–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowker, K.A.
    2007. Barnett Shale Gas Production, Fort Worth Basin: Issues and Discussion. AAPG Bulletin91 (4): 523–533.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GarcíaM.N., Sorenson, F., Bonapace, J.C.
    et al.2013. Vaca Muerta Shale Reservoir Characterization and Description: The Starting Point for Development of a Shale Play with Very Good Possibilities for a Successful Project. Paper URTeC 1508336 presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 12–14 August.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hogg, S.L.
    1993. Geology and hydrocarbon potential of the Neuquén Basin. Journal of Petroleum Geology16: 383–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JPB
    JPB. 2011. http://www.files.ethz.ch/structuralgeology/JPB/files/English/1Introtecto.pdf (accessed September 2013).
  6. Legarreta, L., Villar, H.J., Cruz, C.E.
    et al.2008. Revisión integrada de los sistemas generadores, estilos de migración-entrampamiento, y volumetría de hidrocarburos en los distritos productivos de la cuenca Neuquina, Argentina. In: Cruz, C.E., Rodríguez, J.F., Hechern, J.J., Villar, H.J. (eds.), Sistemas Petroleros de las Cuencas Andinas. Instituto Argentino del Petróleo y el Gas, Buenos Aires, 79–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mosquera, A. and Ramos, V.A.
    2006. Intraplate deformation in the Neuquén Embayment. En: Kay, S. and Ramos, V. (eds.): Evolution of an Andean margin: a tectonic and magmatic view from the Andes to the Neuquén Basin (35°-39°S lat), Geological Society of America, Special Paper 407: 97–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mosquera, A., SilvestroJ., Ramos, V.A.
    et al. 2011. La estructura de la dorsal de Huincul. En Leanza, H.et al. (eds.) Geología y Recursos Naturales de la Provincia del Neuquén, 17º Congreso Geológico Argentino, Relatorio 385–398, Neuquén.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mpodozis, C. and Ramos, V.
    1989. The Andes of Chile and Argentina. Ericksen, G.E., Cañas Pinochet, M.T., and Reinemund, J.A. (eds.) Geology of the Andes and its relation to hydrocarbon and mineral resources. Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, Earth Sciences series v.11, Houston, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramos, V.A., Mosquera, A., Folguera, A.Y.
    et al.2011. Evolución tectónica de los Andes y del engolfamiento neuquino adyacente. En Leanza, H.et al. (eds.), Geología y Recursos Naturales de la Provincia del Neuquén, 17º Congreso Geológico Argentino, Relatorio 335–344, Neuquén.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Silvestro, J. and Zubiri, M.
    2008. Convergencia Oblicua: Modelo estructural alternativo para la Dorsal Neuquina (39°S) – Neuquén. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina63 (1): 49–64.
  12. Zamora Balcarce, G., Zapata, T., Del Pino, D.
    et al.2006. Structural evolution and magmatic characteristics of the Agrio fold-and thrust belt. En: Kay, S.M. and Ramos, V.A. (Eds.): Evolution of an Andean margin: A tectonic and magmatic view from the Andes to the Neuquén Basin (35°-39° S lat), Geological Society of America, Special Paper 407: 125–145. doi:10.1130/2006.2407(06).
    https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2407(06) [Google Scholar]
  13. Zavala, C., Ponce, J., Arcuri, M.
    et al.2006. Ancient Lacustrine hyperpycnites: a depositional model from a case study in the Rayoso Formation (Cretaceous) of west-central Argentina. Journal of Sedimentary Research76: 40–58.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.2118/167707-MS
Loading
/content/papers/10.2118/167707-MS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error