1887

Abstract

Summary

To apply classic methods such as Eaton’s Equation and the Equivalent Depth method for overpressure prediction, one needs to determine the “Normal Compaction Trend (NCT)” which represents the variations of petrophysical parameters with the burial depth when sediments compact normally. In this paper, we propose to use the modified Clay-Plus-Silt (CPS) model by incorporating the kerogen effect into the original model to construct the NCT for pore pressure prediction in organic-rich shales. Compared with the conventional NCT construction method which is by fitting to the pressure measurements to achieve suitable parameterized expressions, this approach gives a more complex velocity-depth relationship by taking into account the vertical lithology changes. Case studies in the southern Sichuan basin of China reveal its superiority in term of a higher accuracy in pore pressure prediction compared with the conventional NCT construction method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601463
2016-05-30
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eaton, B.A.
    [1975] The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, SPE 5544.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Guo, Z.Q., Li, X.Y., Liu, C., Feng, X. and Shen, Y.
    [2013] A shale rock physics model for analysis of brittleness index, mineralogy and porosity in the Barnett Shale. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Han, T., Pervukhina, M. and Clennell, M.B.
    [2014] Overpressure prediction in shales. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Tu G106 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pervukhina, M., Dewhurst, D. N., Gurevich, B., Kuila, U., Siggins, A.F., Raven, M. and Bolas, H.M.
    [2008] Stress-dependent elastic properties of shales: measurement and modelling. The Leading Edge, 27, 772–779.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pervukhina, M., Delle Piane, C., Dewhurst, D. N., Clennell, M.B. and Nordgard Bolas, H. M.
    [2013] An estimation of pore pressure in shales from sonic velocities. 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Extended abstract, 2653–2657.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sayers, C.M., Den Boer, L.D., Nagy, Z.R. and Hooyman, P.J.
    [2006] Well-constrained seismic estimation of pore pressure with uncertainty. The Leading Edge, 25, 1524–1526.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Slotnick, M.M.
    [1936] On seismic computation with applications. Geophysics, 1, 9–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tingay, M.R.P., Hillis, R.R., Swarbrick, R.E., Morley, C.K. and Damit, A.R.
    [2009] Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province. AAPG Bull., 93, 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, J.
    [2011] Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modification, and new approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 108, 50–63.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601463
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601463
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error