1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

In the daily operation of an oil and gas production system, a lot of decisions have to be taken that affects the volumes produced and the cost of production and the necessity of optimized products or processes prevails in many sectors of industry. Reservoir model is an important piece of the solution which should be updated by time. In time updating not only is important for reservoir modeling but also makes a lot of benefit along optimization. Task of gathering data comes up with monitoring tools and it’s inevitable. Before applying every solution or plan, it must have economic justification. In this study one of the Iranian offshore oil reservoir was studied to depict necessity of optimizing 29 wells of injection/production rate. At first, the reservoir model was constructed by ECLIPSE 2012 simulator, and then linked with coding program which is contained Genetic Algorithm. Finally by applying optimization in a certain period of time, some wells did not need to be closed compare to real operational stage and final recovery increased about 5.3 percent. This study shows monitoring play a main role for this field to increase the oil recovery. In addition, this job illustrates a scenario for wells operation.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
2018-09-09
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. C.Blum, A.Roli
    , [2003], “Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison”. Journal ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Surveys Homepage archive, Volume 35, Issue 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. RoblesO, Román, R.
    , [2008], “Un Modelo de Programación No Lineal para la Planeación de la Producción de Gas y Petróleo”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Amsterdan, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. J.Qin and T. A.Badgwell
    . [1997], “An overview of industrial model predictive control technology”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gong, M., L.C.Jiao., H.F.Du
    ., [2008], “Multi-objective innmure algorithm with nondominated nieghbord-based selection”. Evolutionary Computation, Volume 16, 225–255.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Centilmen, A., Ertekin, T., Grader, A.S.
    , [1999], “Applications of Neural Networks in Multi well Field Development”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Houston, 3-6 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Guyaguler, B., Horne, R. N., Rogers, L., and Rosenzweig, J. J.
    , [2000]. “Optimization of Well Placement in a Gulf of Mexico Water-flooding Project”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Dallas, Texas, 1-4 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Queipo, N.V., J.V.Goicochea, and S.Pintos
    , [2002], “Surrogate modeling-based optimization of SAGD processes”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 31(0–7): p. 43 – 23.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Badru, O. and C.S.Kabir
    , [2003], “Well Placement Optimization in Field Development”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1-4 October, Denver, Colorado.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Tavakolian, M. Jalili, F. Emadi, M. A.
    , [2004], “Production Optimization using Genetic Algorithm Approach”. ISBN: 978–1-55563-976-1, 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2-4 August, Abuja, Nigeria.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. U.Ozdogan, A.S.B.Yeten, B.Guyaguler, and W.H.Chen
    , [2005], “Efficient Assessment and Optimization of A Deep water Asset Using Fixed Pattern Approach”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Dallas, Texas.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Maschio, C. Nakajima, L. Schiozer, D. J.
    , [2008], “Production Strategy Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm and Quality Map”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 9-12 June, Rome, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. MasoudAsadollahi and GeirNaevdal
    , [2010], “Selection of Decision Variables for Large-Scale Production Optimization Problems Applied to Brugge Field”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Moscow, Russia.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. R. J.Lorentzen, A.Shafieirad, G.Naevdal
    , [2009], “Closed loop reservoir management using the ensemble kalman filter and sequential quadratic programming”. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
Loading
Describing Necessity of Optimizing of Injection/Production Rate for One of Offshore Iranian Oil Filed-Case Study
Conference Proceedings 2018, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802645
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error