1887
PDF

Abstract

We think anisotropic velocity analysis, which is known important for understanding the behavior of hydraulically generated fractures and due to stress surrounded a borehole, would be key to understand the state consolidation of sediments near the surface. There are many studies on seismic wave propagation in transversely isotropic and orthorhombic media. In the most of those studies, the magnitude of anisotropy is assumed to be weak. In addition, there are few studies on seismic wavefields in quite strongly anisotropic media. Therefore, it may not be appropriate to apply their theories directly to strongly anisotropic subsurface media. It is necessary to understand the effects of the anisotropy on the behavior of seismic wave propagation in strongly anisotropic media in the seismic exploration. In this study, we investigate the influence of strong anisotropy on received seismic waveforms using three-dimensional numerical models, and verified capability of detecting subsurface anisotropy. Our numerical models contain an isotropic and an anisotropic (transversely isotropic) layer in an isotropic background subsurface. Since the difference between the two models is only the anisotropy in the vertical propagation velocity, we could observe the influence of anisotropy in the residual wavefield that is the difference in the observed wavefields of two models. The residual waveforms could be exploited to estimate both the order of anisotropy and the thickness of anisotropic layer in subsurface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140206
2016-05-24
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2352-8265/2016/RAEG2016_RinaYoneki.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140206&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sone, H.
    , 2012, Mechanical properties of shale gas reservoir rocks and its relation to the in-situ stress variation in shale gas reservoir, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 225pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Thomsen, L.
    , 1986, Weak elastic anisotropy, Geophysics, 51 (10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alkhalifah, T.
    , 2000, An acoustic wave equation for anisotropic media, Geophysics, 65 (4), 1239–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Matsumoto, S.
    , 2009, A review on structure of the earth using scattered seismic waves by heterogeneity, Jishin, 61, 209–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aki, K. and Richards, P. G.
    , 2002, Quantitative seismology, University Sience Book (transrated in Japanese by Uenishi, K., Kame, N., Aochi, H., 2004, Kokon-shoin)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Virieux, J.
    , 1986, P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method, Geophysics, 51 (4), 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saenger, E. H., Gold, N., and Shapiro, S. A.
    , 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified fnite-difference grid, Wave motion,31(1), 77–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saenger, E. H., and Bohlen, T.
    , 2004, Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid, Geophysics, 69 (2), 583–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Komatitsch, D., Martin, R.
    , 2007, An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation, An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation, 72, 155–167.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140206
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140206
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error