Accuracy of Optimally Blended Methods for Wave Propagation

References

1. Ainsworth, M. and Wajid, H.A.
   [2010] Optimally blended spectral-finite element scheme for wave propagation and nonstandard reduced integration. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(1), 346–371.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bazilevs, Y., Calo, V.M., Cottrell, J.A., Evans, J.A., Hughes, T.J.R., Lipton, S., Scott, M.A. and Sederberg, T.W.
   [2010] Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199(5), 229–263.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hughes, T.J., Cottrell, J.A. and Bazilevs, Y.
   [2005] Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 194(39), 4135–4195.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Li, M., Druskin, V., Abubakar, A. and Habashy, T.
   [2016] A 2.5D elastic wave modeling algorithm using near-optimal quadratures. Proceedings of the 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Marfurt, K.J.
   [1984] Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. Geophysics, 49(5), 533–549.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mulder, W.A.
   [2013] New triangular mass-lumped finite elements of degree six for wave propagation. Progress in Electromagnetics Research PIER, 141, 671–692.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Puzyrev, V., Deng, Q. and Calo, V.
   Dispersion-optimized quadrature rules for isogeometric analysis: modified inner products, their dispersion properties, and optimally blended schemes. Submitted to Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, arXiv:1612.09097.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Zhebel, E., Minisini, S., Kononov, A. and Mulder, W.A.
   [2014] A comparison of continuous mass-lumped finite elements with finite differences for 3-D wave propagation. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 1111–1125.
   [Google Scholar]