1887

Abstract

Summary

In this paper, we extend previous studies of time-lapse seismic analysis via incorporating lab measurements for a realistic physical model to investigate the effects of reservoir fluid substitution on time-lapse seismic assessments both inside and outside the reservoir. A three-layered physical model is formed of laterally heterogeneous reservoirs having a large thickness interval that may produce significant elastic wave scattering phenomenon and hence attenuation, and filled with oil, gas and water. The modelled 4D seismic responses with high repeatability and good quality for time-lapse surveys and strengthened time-lapse seismic data processing, lead to improved understanding of reservoir fluid property evolutions. Specifically, time-lapse differences of 3D surveys in reflection amplitude signatures, travel-time and frequency-dependent characteristics are strong between the oil-water substitution surveys having weak contrast of elastic properties and significant between the oil-gas substitution surveys having large perturbation of elastic properties. Seismic surveys regardless of oil-water or oil-gas substitution produce significant 4D seismic amplitude anomalies complicated by reservoirs with strong heterogeneities. The results indicate that the time-lapse seismic technique can be used as a valuable reservoir management tool for accurate identification, both qualitatively and semi-quantitatively, of fluid variations of oil production by water or gas injection in heterogeneous reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700694
2017-06-12
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angus, D.A., Verdon, J.P., Fisher, Q.J., Kendall, J-M., Segura, J.M., Kristiansen, T.G., Crook, A.J.L., Skachkov, S., Yu, J. and Dutko, M.
    [2011] Integrated fluid-flow, geomechanical and seismic modeling for reservoir characterization. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Recorder, 36(4), 26–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barkved, O.I.
    [2012] Seismic Surveillance for Reservoir Delivery. EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Garcia, A. and MacBeth, C.
    [2013] An estimation method for effective stress changes in a reservoir from 4D seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 803–816.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. He, Y.-X., Angus, D.A., Blanchard, T.D., Wang, G.L., Yuan, S.-Y. and Garcia, A.
    [2016a] Time-lapse seismic waveform modelling and attributes analysis using hydromechanical models for a deep reservoir undergoing depletion. Geophysical Journal Internal, 25, 389–407.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. He, Y.-X., Angus, D.A., Clark, R.A. and Hildyard, M.W.
    [2016b] Analysis of time-lapse travel-time and amplitude changes to assess reservoir compartmentalization. Geophysical Prospecting, 64, 54–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Herwanger, J.V. and Koutsabeloulis, N.
    [2011] Seismic Geomechanics: How to build and calibrate geomechanical models using 3D and 4D seismic data. EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rojas, N., Ecopetrol, S.A. and Davis, T.L.
    [2009] Spectral decomposition applied to time-lapse seismic interpretation, Rulison Field, Colorado. 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 3845–3849.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Landrø, M. and Stammeijer, J.
    [2004] Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes. Geophysics, 69(4), 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wandler, A., Evans, B. and Link, C.
    [2007] AVO as a fluid indicator: A physical modeling study. Geophysics, 72, C9–C17.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, S.X., Li, X.Y., Di, B.R. and Booth, D.
    [2010] Reservoir fluid substitution effects on seismic profile interpretation: A physical modeling experiment. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L10306.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700694
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700694
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error