1887

Abstract

Summary

Understanding the formation of unconformities is key to unravel the history of rifted margin formation. Available data, does not always provide enough information to relate unconformities and rift evolution. Here, we explore the tectonic meaning of unconformities by using numerical models, which reproduce different modes of extension.

We find that regional unconformities occur due to migration of extension from one sector of the margin towards another. For intermediate strength crust, sequential faulting, younging towards the ocean, leads to the formation of asymmetric basins and to progressively younger syn- and post-kinematic sediments ocean-wards. Thus, the unconformity that separates syn-kinematic sediments from sag-fill sediments, dates the beginning of the sequential faulting phase and is diachronous along the basin. For weak crusts, a first phase of rifting occurs along a wide area, followed by a narrow rifting phase that ends in crustal break-up. In this case, localization of the deformation in the narrow rifting phase results in an unconformity that separates syn- from post-kinematic sediments. Although, these modelled unconformities have all the geometric characteristics of break-up unconformities, they form before break-up. Consequently, the coupled use of thermo-mechanical and stratigraphic modelling is key to complement seismic interpretation of unconformities, reducing exploration risk.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701308
2017-06-12
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armitage, J.J., Burgess, P.M., Hampson, G.J. and Allen, P.A.
    [2016] Deciphering the origin of cyclical gravel front and shoreline progradation and retrogradation in the stratigraphic record. Basin Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brune, S., Heine, C., Pérez-Gussinyé, M. and Sobolev, S.V.
    [2014] Rift migration explains continental margin asymmetry and crustal hyper-extension. Nature Communications, 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dabrowski, M., Krotkiewski, M. and Schmid, D.W.
    [2008] MILAMIN: MATLAB-based finite element method solver for large problems. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gleason, G.C. and Tullis, J.
    [1995] A flow law for dislocation creep of quartz aggregates determined with the molten salt cell. Tectonophysics, 247(1), 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hirth, G. and Kohlstedt, D.
    [2003] Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle wedge: A view from the experimentalists. In: Eiler, J. (Ed.) Inside the subduction factory, AGU, 83–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huismans, R. and Beaumont, C.
    [2011] Depth-dependent extension, two-stage breakup and cratonic underplating at rifted margins. Nature, 473(7345), 74–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huismans, R.S. and Beaumont, C.
    [2014] Rifted continental margins: The case for depth-dependent extension. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 407.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ranero, C.R. and Pérez-Gussinyé, M.
    [2010] Sequential faulting explains the asymmetry and extension discrepancy of conjugate margins. Nature, 468(7321), 294–299.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith, T.R. and Bretherton, F.P.
    [1972] Stability and the conservation of mass in drainage basin evolution. Water Resources Research, 8(6), 1506–1529.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilks, K. and Carter, N.
    [1990] Rheology of some continental lower crustal rocks. Tectonophysics, 182(1–2), 57–77.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701308
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701308
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error