1887
Volume 35 Number 9
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We consider multiply covered traveltimes of first or later arrivals which are gathered along a refraction seismic profile. The two‐dimensional distribution of these traveltimes above a coordinate frame generated by the shotpoint axis and the geophone axis or by the common midpoint axis and the offset axis is named a traveltime field.

The application of the principle of reciprocity to the traveltime field implies that for each traveltime value with a negative offset there is a corresponding equal value with positive offset. In appendix A procedures are demonstrated which minimize the observational errors of traveltimes inherent in particular traveltime branches or complete common shotpoint sections.

The application of the principle of parallelism to an area of the traveltime field associated with a particular refractor can be formulated as a partial differential equation corresponding to the type of the vibrating string. The solution of this equation signifies that the two‐dimensional distribution of these traveltimes may be generated by the sum of two one‐dimensional functions which depend on the shotpoint coordinate and the geophone coordinate. Physically, these two functions may be interpreted as the mean traveltime branches of the reverse and the normal shot. In appendix B procedures are described which compute these two functions from real traveltime observations by a least‐squares fit.

The application of these regressed traveltime field data to known time‐to‐depth conversion methods is straightforward and more accurate and flexible than the use of individual traveltime branches. The wavefront method, the plus‐minus method, the generalized reciprocal method and a ray tracing method are considered in detail. A field example demonstrates the adjustment of regressed traveltime fields to observed traveltime data. A time‐to‐depth conversion is also demonstrated applying a ray tracing method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00855.x
2006-04-27
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackermann, H.D., Pankratz, L.W. and Dansereau, D.1986. Resolution of ambiguities of seismic refraction traveltime curves, Geophysics51, 223–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brückl, E., Gangl, G. and Steinhauser, P.1969. Die Ergebnisse der seismischen Gletschermessungen am Dachstein im Jahre 1967, Arbeiten aus der Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien 4, p. 24.
  3. Hagedoorn, I.G.1959. The plus‐minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections, Geophysical Prospecting7, 158–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones, M.G. and Jovanovich, D.B.1985. A ray inversion method for refraction analysis, Geophysics50, 1701–1720.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Meissner, R. and Stegena, L.1977. Praxis der seismischen Feldmessung und Auswertung, Gebrüder Bornträger, p. 275.
  6. Ocola, L.C.1972. A nonlinear least‐squares method for seismic refraction mapping, Part 1: algorithm and procedure, Geophysics37, 260–272.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Palmer, D.1980. The Generalized Reciprocal Method of Seismic Refraction Interpretation, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 104.
  8. Sattlegger, J.1982. Migration of seismic interfaces, Geophysical Prospecting30, 71–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schultz, Ph.S. and Clearbout, J.F.1978. Velocity estimation and downward continuation by wave front synthesis, Geophysics43, 691–714.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thornburgh, H.R.1930. Wavefront diagram in seismic interpretation, Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists14, 185–200.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00855.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error