1887
Volume 50, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The aim of seismic reservoir monitoring is to map the spatial and temporal distributions and contact interfaces of various hydrocarbon fluids and water within a reservoir rock. During the production of hydrocarbons, the fluids produced are generally displaced by an injection fluid. We discuss possible seismic effects which may occur when the pore volume contains two or more fluids. In particular, we investigate the effect of immiscible pore fluids, i.e. when the pore fluids occupy different parts of the pore volume.

The modelling of seismic velocities is performed using a differential effective‐medium theory in which the various pore fluids are allowed to occupy the pore space in different ways. The P‐wave velocity is seen to depend strongly on the bulk modulus of the pore fluids in the most compliant (low aspect ratio) pores. Various scenarios of the microscopic fluid distribution across a gas–oil contact (GOC) zone have been designed, and the corresponding seismic properties modelled. Such GOC transition zones generally give diffuse reflection regions instead of the typical distinct GOC interface. Hence, such transition zones generally should be modelled by finite‐difference or finite‐element techniques.

We have combined rock physics modelling and seismic modelling to simulate the seismic responses of some gas–oil zones, applying various fluid‐distribution models. The seismic responses may vary both in the reflection time, amplitude and phase characteristics. Our results indicate that when performing a reservoir monitoring experiment, erroneous conclusions about a GOC movement may be drawn if the microscopic fluid‐distribution effects are neglected.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00304.x
2002-11-23
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BatzleM. and WangZ.1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics57, 1396–1408.DOI: 10.1029/1999JB900190
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BergeP.A., FryerG.J. and WilkensR.H.1992. Velocity–porosity relationships in the upper oceanic crust: theoretical considerations. Journal of Geophysical Research97, 15239–15254.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerrymanJ.G.1980a. Long‐wavelength propagation in composite elastic media. I. Spherical inclusions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1809–1819.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BerrymanJ.G.1980b. Long‐wavelength propagation in composite elastic media. II. Ellipsoidal inclusions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1820–1831.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BerrymanJ.G.1992. Single‐scattering approximations for coefficients in Biot's equations of poro‐elasticity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America91, 551–571.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BiotM.A.1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid. I. Low‐frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 168–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BiotM.A.1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid. II. Higher‐frequency range. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 179–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ClarkV.A.1992. The effect of oil under in‐situ conditions on the seismic properties of rocks. Geophysics57, 894–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DietrichM.1988. Modelling of marine seismic profiles in the t‐x and tau‐p domains. Geophysics53, 453–465.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DvorkinJ., MoosD., PackwoodJ.L. and NurA.1999. Identifying patchy saturation from well logs. Geophysics64, 1756–1759.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DvorkinJ. and NurA.1996. Elasticity of high‐porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics61, 1363–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DvorkinJ. and NurA.1998. Acoustic signatures of patchy saturation. International Journal of Solids and Structures35, 4803–4810.DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00095-X
    [Google Scholar]
  13. EndresA.L. and KnightR.1989. The effect of microscopic fluid distribution on elastic wave velocities. The Log Analyst30, 437–444.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GassmannF.1951. Elastic waves through a packing of spheres. Geophysics16, 673–685.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GueguenY., ChelidzeT. and RavalecM.L.1997. Microstructures, percolation thresholds, and rock physical properties. Tectonophysics279, 23–35.DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00132-7
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HashinZ. and ShtrikmanS.1963. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HillR.1952. The elastic behaviour of crystalline aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society of LondonA65, 349–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HillR.1963. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids11, 357–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HornbyB.E., SchwartzL.M. and HudsonJ.1994. Anisotropic effective‐medium modelling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics59, 1570–1583.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. IshimaruA.1978. Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media.Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JakobsenM., HudsonJ.A., MinshullT. and SinghS.2000. Elastic properties of hydrate‐bearing sediments using effective medium theory. Journal of Geophysical Research105, 561–577.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. JohnstonD.H., McKennyR.S. and BurkhartT.D.1997. Time‐lapse seismic analysis of the North Sea Fulmar Field. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts,890–893.
  23. KorringaJ., BrownR.J.S., ThompsonD.D. and RungeR.J.1979. Self‐consistent imbedding and the ellipsoidal model for porous rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research84, 5591–5598.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KusterG.T. and ToksözM.N.1974. Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two‐phase media: Part I. Theoretical formulations. Geophysics39, 587–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LandrøM., SolheimO.A., HildeE., EkrenB.O. and StrønenL.K.1999. The Gullfaks 4D seismic study. Petroleum Geoscience5, 213–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MarionD. and NurA.1991. Pore‐filling material and its effect on velocity in rocks. Geophysics56, 225–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MehtaC.H.1983. Scattering theory of wave propagation in two‐phase medium. Geophysics48, 1359–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ReussA.1929. Berechnung der Fliessgrenzen von Mischkristallen auf Grund der Plastizitätsbedingung für Einkristalle. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik9, 49–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SayersC.M.1993. Anelliptic approximations for shales. Journal of Seismic Exploration2, 319–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SayersC.M.1994. The elastic anisotropy of shales. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 767–774.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ShengP.1990. Effective‐medium theory of sedimentary rocks. Physics ReviewB41, 4507–4512.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ToksözM.N., ChengC.H. and TimurA.1976. Velocities of seismic waves in porous rocks. Geophysics41, 621–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. VoigtW.1928. Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik. Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. WattsG.F., JizbaD., GawithD.E. and GutteridgeP.1996. Reservoir monitoring of the Magnus Field through 4D time‐lapse seismic analysis. Petroleum Geoscience2, 361–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WillisJ.R.1977. Bounds and self‐consistent estimates for the overall properties of anisotropic composites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids25, 185–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WoodA.B.1930. A Textbook of Sound. G. Bell & Sons Ltd, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WuT.T.1966. The effect of inclusion shape on the elastic moduli of a two‐phase material. International Journal of Solids and Structures2, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. YaleD.P.1985. Recent advances in rock physics. Geophysics50, 2480–2491.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00304.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00304.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error