1887
Volume 43 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

Abstract

In order to detect underground cavities, we have designed a geophysical method based on the interaction of a monochromatic electromagnetic wave in the frequency band 100 MHz to 1 GHz with the ground situated between two boreholes.

Three different approaches are involved in the design of this EM tomographic method.

  • The application of an ‘exact’ theory is used to calculate artificial data, based on an integral equation method. These data are inverted using a tomographic algorithm whose basic assumptions are rather coarse. The results show that, however, cavities can very well be detected and their position recovered.
  • Data are obtained with a physical reduced‐scale model in a water tank, in which all parameters are known in advance. The inversion process confirms the validity of the method.
  • Underground cavities are actually detected.

The above approaches are described and discussed and results are shown. The equipment involved and its operation is quite simple: the surface devices are commercially available and only the transmitter and receiver antennae must be specially built. The method is shown to be quite efficient and its cost should be reasonably low.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00297.x
2006-04-28
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abou AramM.1990. Influence de la topographie du terrain sur la propagation des ondes électromagnétiques en basses fréquences. Thése de doctorat. Université de Lille, France .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BañosA.1966. Dipole Radiation in the Presence of a Conducting Half‐space. Pergamon Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CôteP.1988. Tomographie sismique en génie civil. Thése de doctorat d'état. Université de Grenoble, France .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CôteP., DegauqueP., GautierV. and LagabrielleR.1990. Tomographie électromagnétique en onde monochromatique, calcul et inversion de données artificielles. Diagraphie et mécaniques des terrains, actes des journées d'études des 13 et 14.11.1990, Bordeaux.
  5. DegauqueP., CôteP. and LagabrielleR.1992. Monofrequency electromagnetic tomography. 54th EAEG meeting, Paris, Expanded Abstracts, 450–451.
  6. DegauqueP., Kassi‐LahlouM., CôteP. and LagabrielleR.1987. Comparison between attenuation seismic tomography and hole to hole electromagnetic measurements at 200 MHz in granite sites. 57th SEG meeting, New Orleans, Expanded Abstracts, 943–944.
  7. DeyA. and MorissonH.F.1979. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped threedimensional structures. Geophysics44, 753–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DinesK.A and LytleR.J.1979. Computerized geophysical tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE67. 1065–1073.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GabillardR., DegauqueP. and WaitJ.R.1971. Subsurface electromagnetic telecommunication – a review. IEEE Transactions on Communication TechnologyCOM‐19, 1217–1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HohmannG.W.1975. Three dimensional induced polarization and electromagnetic modeling. Geophysics40, 309–324.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HowardA.Q. and KretzschmarJ.L.1986. Synthesis of EM geophysical tomographic data. Proceedings of the I EEE74, 353–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kassi‐LahlouM.1988. Rayonnement d'une antenne verticale placée dans un forage – application á la tomographie électromagnétique. Thése de doctorat. Université de Lille, France .
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KingR.W.P. and SmithG.S.1981. Antennas in Matter – Fundamentals, Theory and Applications. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LagerD.L. and LytleR.J.1977. Determining a subsurface electromagnetic profile from high‐frequency measurements by applying reconstruction‐technique algorithms. Radio Science12, 249–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LeventN., CôteP. and LagabrielleR.1994. Tomographie électromagnétique monochromatique – essais sur modéle réduit. Bulletin de Liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, No 192, p. 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LytleR.J. and LagerD.L.1974. Numerical evaluation of Sommerfeld integrals. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, California , UCLR 51688.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LytleR.J., LaineE.F., LagerD.L. and DavisD.T.1979. Cross‐borehole electromagnetic probing to locate high‐contrast anomalies. Geophysics44, 1667–1676.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MillerR.J.
    and DennisR.F. (eds)1993. Fourth tunnel detection symposium on subsurface exploration technology: 26–29 April 1993, Golden, CO, U.S. Army BRDEC, Ft. Belvoir, VA, U.S. Govt. Printing Office 1993‐363‐415,687p.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MuftiI.R.1980. Finite‐difference evaluation of resistivity curves. Geophysical Prospecting28, 146–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. NeumannR.1967. La gravimétrie de haute précision, application á la recherche de cavités. Geophysical Prospecting, 15, 116–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. OlhoeftG.R.1988. Interpretation of hole to hole radar measurements. Proceedings of 3rd Technical Symposium on Tunnel Detection, Golden, Colorado.
  22. ParkerR.L.1977. Understanding inverse theory. Annual Reviews of Earth Planetary Sciences5, 35–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rahmat‐SamiiY., ParhamiP. and MittraR.1980. An efficient approach for evaluating Sommerfeld integrals encountered in the problem of a current element radiating over lassy ground. IEEE Transactions on Antennae and PropagationAP‐28.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RamirezA.L. and DailyW.D.1987. Evaluation of alterant geophysical tomography in welded tuff. Journal of Geophysical Research92, 7843–7853.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SchneiderJ., BrewJ. and PedenI. C.1991. Electromagnetic detection of buried dielectric targets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingGE‐29, 555–562.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. U.S.Army1988. Third technical symposium on tunnel proceedings: 12‐15 january 1988, Golden, CO, U.S. Army BRDEC, Ft. Belvoir, VA, U.S. Govt. Printing Office 1988‐O‐ 220‐281, 646p.
  27. WaitJ.R.1971. Electromagnetic Probing in Geophysics391 p. The Golem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00297.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error