1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 3, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 3 Number 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The gravity difference between two stations, one at the surface and the other underground vertically below the former and at a given distance from it, depends on the mean density of the earth, σ as well as on the density of the layer of rock contained between the two stations. When one of these densities is known, the other can be computed from this gravity difference. The reliability of this determination depends on the relative accuracies with which σ and σ can be obtained.

These accuracies are discussed in the paper. The mean density of. the earth has been determined with an accuracy of approximately 0.01 gr/cm3. The determination of the density of a layer of rock depends on density determinations of rock samples which are not representative of the layer as a whole. Thus the accuracy of the value of σ based on a number of sample determinations will depend on many factors, including the method of averaging the density values obtained from the samples and the degree of uniformity in the geology.

To investigate the problem discussed above, three sets of gravity measurements were made under differing conditions. In each instance a number of pairs of stations vertically above each other were occupied on the surface and underground. The results computed from the data on each pair of stations in a set of measurements were considered as repeated measurements of the same quantity, and the most probable value was calculated.

The results demonstrated that the accuracy varied with the conditions prevailing in the area where the observations were made. In Godstone Quarries the dip of the strata was negligible, the rocks fairly uniform and structural conditions undisturbed. Consequently, although the rock layer between the surface and underground stations was only of the order of a hundred feet, the mean density of the earth computed from the average density of the rock samples, was very close to the accepted standard value of 5.52 gr./cm3. This agreement, however, was easily upset when only one random sample density was assumed as representative of a given formation.

In a different locality in Cumberland the observations were made in a mine and on the surface. The rock layer between the surface and the underground stations was approximately a thousand feet thick. One set of measurements followed a line parallel to a fault, the other a line crossing this fault. The results differed appreciably from the standard value of σ, particularly in the latter case.

It is concluded that the gravity difference between a surface and an underground station can be used satisfactorily to determine the average density of a rock layer in situ and en bloc, using the standard value for the mean Earth density.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1955.tb01371.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1955.tb01371.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BenfieldA. E., 1937, “Note on the Variation of Gravity with Depth”, Zeitschrift fur GeophysikVol. XIII. Heft 4/5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BullenK. E., 1936, “The Variation of Density and the Ellipticities of Strata of Equal Density within the Earth”, M.N.R.A.S. Geophysical Supplement Vol. 3. No. 9, p. 395.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChampionF. C, 1937, & DavyN. Properties of Matter, pp. 38–41, Prentice‐Hall Inc. N.Y .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Domzalski, W., 1954, “Gravity Measurements in a Vertical Shaft”, Bulletin I.M.M. June 1954. (Tansactions I.M.M. Vol. 63, 1953/4 part 9) pp. 429–445).
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Domzalski, W., 1955, “Three Dimensional Gravity Survey” Geophysical-Prospecting Vol. 3. No. I. pp 15–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heyl, P. R., 1930, “A Redetermination of the Constant of Gravitation”, American Bureau of Standards, Journal of Research Vol. 5, pp. 1243–1290.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JeffreysH., 1937, “On the Materials and Density of the Earth's Crust”, M.N.R.A.S. GeophysicalSupplementVol. IV No. 1, pp. 50–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. JeffreysH., 1952, “The Earth”, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kayes, G. W. C. & Laby, T. H., 1952, “Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants”, Longmans , Green; & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. OlczakT., 1938, “On the Mass of the Earth and on Gravity within the Earth”, Acta Astronomica, Serie C. Vol. 3. Gracovie 1938. pp. 81–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. RamsayA. S., 1952, “An Introduction to the Theory of Newtonian Attraction”, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SaxovS., 1952, “The Variation of Gravity within the Earth”, Tellus Vol. 4. No. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. StewartR. M. Gravity in the Interior of the Earth”, Journal of the R.A.S. of Canada, Vol. XLIII No. 4, pp. 129–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. StokesG. G. On Attractions and on Clairaut's Theorem”, Mathematical & Physical Papers1883. pp. 116.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1955.tb01371.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error