1887
Volume 39 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

For over 20 years, powerful VLF transmitters have been used as electromagnetic sources for subsurface investigations in mining exploration. Measurements initially concerned the vertical component of the magnetic field or the inclination of the field and were later extended to measurement of the horizontal electric field in the direction of the transmitter, to determine the resistivity of the terrain. Measurement of the electric field is usually performed with electric lines, grounded or not, with lengths of at least 5 m.

This paper presents the concept of a VLF resistivity meter with a very short electric sensor (1 m) and the results obtained with it. This technique improves the measurement of the electric field, which is in principle a point value. It also permits a higher spatial sampling rate and, by closely linking the electric sensor with the magnetic sensor on a lightweight mount, makes it possible for the instrument to be used by a single operator.

In addition, transformation of the electric field data, analogous to reduction to the pole in magnetism, is proposed to correct the horizontal deformation of the anomalies created by polarization of the primary field. Comparison with direct current electrical measurements shows highly satisfactory correlations. This transformation, validated for VLF, can be extended to any electrical or electromagnetic method using a uniform primary field, i.e. gradient array in direct current or low‐frequency magnetotellurics. We call this verticalization of the electric field.

Resistivity measurements and mapping using the VLF frequency range can be applied not only to mining but also to a wide range of shallow geophysical studies (hydrology, civil engineering, etc.) and are not limited to problems concerning the location of conductive targets

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00360.x
2006-04-27
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arcone, S.A.1979. Resolution studies in airborne resistivity surveying at V.L.F. Geophysics44, 937–946.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baranov, V.1957. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: pseudo‐gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics22, 359–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benderitter, Y. and Robin, G.1987. Approche singulière des discontinuités de perméabilité en milieu carbonate. Hydrogéologie3, 161–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cagniard, L.1953. Basic theory of the magneto‐telluric method of geophysical prospecting. Geophysics18, 605–635.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collett, L.S. and Becker, A.1968. Radiohm method for earth resistivity mapping. Canadian Patent 795919.
  6. de la Comble, R. and Tabbagh, A.1988. Méthodes électriques de prospection: réponse spatiale des capteurs de champ électrique à contact conductif avec le sol. Revue ?Archéométrie12, 11–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher, G., Le Quang, B.V. and Muller, I.1983. VLF ground survey ‐ A powerful tool for the study of shallow two‐dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting31, 977–991.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraser, D.C.1969. Contouring of VLF‐EM data. Geophysics34, 958–967.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frolov, A.D.1961. Radio wave method of geological mapping. International Geological Review3, 1048–1059.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Guineau, B.1975. Exemples ?application de la méthode magnétotellurique de prospection géophysique àľetude des structures ou de formations géologiques situées sous un très faible recouvrement. Geophysical Prospecting23, 104–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gunn, P.J.1975. Linear transformations of gravity and magnetic fields. Geophysical Prospecting23, 300–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herz, A.1986. Airborne E.M. instruments operating at VLF and higher frequencies: In: Airborne Resistivity Mapping, G. J.Palacky (ed.), Geological Survey of Canada, 55–61.
  13. Hings, D.L.1968. Telluric current responsive device having spaced conductors for positioning adjacent the earth's surface. U.S. Patent 3‐361957.
  14. Hjelt, S.E., Kaikkonen, P. and Pietila, R.1984. On the interpretation of V.L.F. resistivity measurements. Geoexploration23, 171–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. King, R.J.1976. Wave‐tilt measurements. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationAP‐24, 115–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lagabrielle, R. and Yardin, D.1978. Application de la magnétotellurique artificielle àľétude de gisements rocheux. Proceedings of the Congress, International Association of Engineering Geologists, IV, 1, 165–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Paterson, N.R. and Ronka, V.1971. Five years of surveying with the very low frequency electromagnetic method. Geoexploration9, 7–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Saydam, A.S.1981. V.L.F. electromagnetic interpretation using tilt angle and ellipticity measurements. Geophysics46, 1594–1605.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tabbagh, A. and Hesse, A.1989. Influence de ľanisotropie du champ primaire en magnétotellurique et en prospection électrique avec un champ primaire uniforme pour la détection à faible profondeur. Revue ?Archéométrie13, 79–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wait, J.R.1989. Comments on “Electric field sensors in E.M. sounding. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences Remote Sensing GE27, 789.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu, W.X. and Thiel, D.V.1989a. Electric field sensors in electromagnetic sounding. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences Remote SensingGE 27, 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, W.X. and Thiel, D.V.1989b. Reply to the comments on “Electric field sensors in electromagnetic sounding. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences Remote Sensing GE27, 790.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00360.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error