1887
Volume 39 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Seismic data are usually separated into P‐waves and S‐waves before being put through a scalar (acoustic) migration. The relationship between polarization and moveout is exploited to design filters that extract the desired wavetype. While these filters can always be applied to shot records, they can only be applied to a triaxial common‐receiver gather in special cases since the moveout of scattered energy on the receiver gather relates to path differences between the surface shots and the scatterer while the polarization is determined by the path from scatterer to downhole geophone. Without the ability to separate wavefields before migration, a ‘vector scalar’ or an elastic migration becomes a necessity.

Here the propagation of the elastic wavefield for a given mode (e.g. P‐S) is approximated by two scalar (acoustic) propagation steps in a ‘vector scalar’ migration. ‘Vector’ in that multicomponent data is migrated and 'scalar’ in that each propagation step is based on a scalar wave equation for the appropriate mode. It is assumed that interaction between the wavefields occurs only once in the far‐field of both the source and receiver. Extraction of the P, SV and SH wavefields can be achieved within the depth migration (if one assumes isotropy in the neighbourhood of the downhole receiver) by a projection onto the polarization for the desired mode. Since the polarization of scattered energy is only a function of scatterer position and receiver position (and not source position), the projection may be taken outside the migration integral in the special case of the depth migration of a common‐receiver gather. The extraction of the desired mode is then performed for each depth migration bin after the separate scalar migration of each receiver gather component.

This multicomponent migration of triaxial receiver gathers is conveniently implemented with a hybrid split‐step Fourier‐excitation‐time imaging condition depth migration. The raytracing to get the excitation‐time imaging condition also provides the expected polarization for the post‐migration projection. The same downward extrapolated wavefield can be used for both the P‐P and P‐S migrations, providing a flexible and efficient route to the migration of multicomponent data.

The technique is illustrated on a synthetic example and a single‐level Walk‐away Seismic Profile (WSP) from the southern North Sea. The field data produced images showing a P‐P reflector below the geophone and localized P‐P and P‐S scatterers at the level of the geo‐phone. These scatterers, which lie outside the zone of specular illumination, are interpreted as faults in the base Zechstein/top Rotliegendes interface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00357.x
2006-04-27
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alam, A., Tahseen, M. and Soufleris, C.1988. A three‐component VSP‐CDP transform. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim, Expanded Abstracts, 531–533.
  2. Beresford‐Smith, G.1980. Signal analysis of in‐seam seismic data . D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford.
  3. Chang, W.F. and McMechan, G.A.1986. Reverse‐time migration of offset vertical seismic profiling data using the excitation‐time imaging condition. Geophysics51, 67–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dankbaar, J.W.M.1987. Vertical seismic profiling: separation of P and S waves. Geophysical Prospecting35, 803–814.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Devaney, A.J. and Oristaglio, M.L.1986. A plane‐wave decomposition for elastic wave fields applied to the separation of P‐waves and S‐waves in vector seismic data. Geophysics51, 419–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Foster, D.J. and Mosher, C.C.1988. Up and downgoing wave field separation for multioffset single level VSP data. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim. Expanded Abstracts, 816–818.
  7. Greenhalgh, S.A., Mason, I.M., Lucas, E., Pant, D. and Eames, R.T.1990. Controlled direction reception filtering of P and S waves in τ‐space. Geophysical Journal International100, 221–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jackson, G.M., Mason, I.M. and Lee, D.1991. Fault mapping using scattered guided arrivals on a single‐level walkaway seismic profile. 53rd EAEG meeting, Florence. Expanded Abstracts, 190–191.
  9. Lee, D., Mason, I.M. and Jackson, G.M.1991. Split‐step Fourier shot‐record migration with deconvolution imaging. Geophysics (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason, I.M., Jackson, G.M., Lee, D. and Campbell, D.S.1990. Fault proximity surveys in the southern North Sea. 60th SEG meeting, San Francisco. Expanded Abstracts, 270–273.
  11. Mason, I.M., Jackson, G.M., Lee, D. and Campbell, D.S.1991. Surface‐to‐borehole fault imaging in a buried horizontal waveguide: an experimental study in the southern North Sea. Geophysics (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller, D., Oristaglio, M. and Beylkin, G.1987. A new slant on seismic imaging: migration and integral geometry. Geophysics52, 943–964.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Omnes, G., Blanco, J. and Renoux, P.1988. Analysis and applications of a three‐component offset VSP in the North Sea. 58th SEG meeting, Anaheim. Expanded Abstracts, 542–544.
  14. Seeman, B. and Horowicz, L.1983. Vertical seismic profiling: separation of upgoing and downgoing acoustic waves in a stratified medium. Geophysics48, 555–568.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00357.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error