Seismic velocity analysis in the scattering‐angle/azimuth domain

References

1. BeylkinG.1985. Imaging of discontinuities in the inverse scattering problem by inversion of a causal generalized Radon transform. Journal of Mathematical Physics26, 99–108.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BeylkinG. and BurridgeR.1990. Linearized inverse scattering problems in acoustics and elasticity. Wave Motion12, 15–52.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BilletteF. and LambaréG.1998. Velocity macro‐model estimation from seismic reflection data by stereotomography. Geophysical Journal International135, 671–690.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brandsberg‐DahlS., De HoopM.V. and UrsinB.1999. Velocity analysis in the common scattering‐angle/azimuth domain. 69th SEG meeting, Houston , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1222–1223.
5. Brandsberg‐DahlS., De HoopM.V. and UrsinB.2003. Focusing in dip and AVA compensation on scattering‐angle/azimuth gathers. Geophysics68, 232–254.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BurridgeR., De HoopM.V., MillerD. and SpencerC.1998. Multiparameter inversion in anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International134, 757–777.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CanningA. and GardnerG.H.1996. Regularizing 3‐D data sets with DMO. Geophysics61, 1103–1114.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ČervenýV.2001. Seismic Ray Theory . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChapmanC.H. and CoatesR.T.1994. Generalized Born scattering in anisotropic media. Wave Motion19, 309–341.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ChapmanC.H. and PrattR.G.1992. Traveltime tomography in anisotropic media‐I. Theory. Geophysical Journal International109, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ChaurisH. and NobleM.2001. Two‐dimensional velocity macro model estimation from seismic reflection data by local differential semblance optimization: application to synthetic and real data sets. Geophysical Journal International144, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
12. De BoorC.1978. A Practical Guide to Splines . Springer‐Verlag New York, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De HoopM.V. and BleisteinN.1997. Generalized Radon transform inversions for reflectivity in anisotropic elastic media. Inverse Problems13, 669–690.
    [Google Scholar]
14. De HoopM.V. and Brandsberg‐DahlS.2000. Maslov extension of generalized Radon transform inversion in anisotropic elastic media: A least‐squares approach. Inverse Problems16, 519–562.
    [Google Scholar]
15. De HoopM.V. and SpencerC.1996. Quasi Monte‐Carlo integration over S 2×S 2 for migration × inversion. Inverse Problems12, 219–239.
    [Google Scholar]
16. De HoopM.V., SpencerC. and BurridgeR.1999. The resolving power of seismic amplitude data: An anisotropic inversion/migration approach. Geophysics64, 852–873.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De HoopM.V., SymesW., Brandsberg‐DahlS. and UrsinB.2001. Tomographic migration velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization with respect to scattering‐angle/azimuth in anisotropic elastic media. CWP‐374 , Colorado School of Mines .
18. DellingerJ., VasicekD. and SondergeldC.1998. Kelvin notation for stabilizing elastic‐constant inversion. Revue de IFP53, 709–719.
    [Google Scholar]
19. FarraV. and Le BégatS.1995. Sensitivity of qP‐wave traveltimes and polarization vectors to heterogeneity, anisotropy and interfaces. Geophysical Journal International121, 371–384.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Farra, V. and MadariagaR.1987. Seismic waveform modeling in heterogeneous media by ray perturbation theory. Journal of Geophysical Research92(B3), 2697–2712.
    [Google Scholar]
21. FayeJ.P. and JeannotJ.P.1986. Pre‐stack migration velocities from depth focusing analysis. 56th SEG meeting, Houston , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 438–440.
22. GillP.E., MurrayW. and WrightM.1981. Practical Optimization . Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
23. HelbigK.1994. Foundation of Anisotropy for Exploration Seismic . Pergamon Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
24. JechJ. and PšenčíkI.1989. First‐order perturbation method for anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International99, 369–376.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MillerD., OristaglioM. and BeylkinG.1987. A new slant on seismic imaging: migration and integral geometry. Geophysics52, 943–964.
    [Google Scholar]
26. PlessixR.E., Ten KroodeF. and MulderW.2000. Automatic crosswell tomography by differential semblance optimization: theory and gradient computation. Geophysical Prospecting48, 913–935.
    [Google Scholar]
27. StolkC.C. and De HoopM.V.2002. Microlocal analysis of seismic inverse scattering in anisotropic, elastic media. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics55, 261–301.
    [Google Scholar]
28. StorkC. and ClaytonR.W.1991. An implementation of tomographic velocity analysis. Geophysics56, 483–495.
    [Google Scholar]
29. SymesW.2000. All stationary points of differential semblance are asymptotic global minimizers: layered acoustics . Rice Inversion Project, Annual Report.
    [Google Scholar]
30. SymesW. and CarazzoneJ.1991. Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization. Geophysics56, 654–663.
    [Google Scholar]
31. TanerM.T. and KoehlerF.1969. Velocity spectra – Digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions. Geophysics, 34, 859–881.
    [Google Scholar]
32. TarantolaA.1987. Inverse Problem Theory . Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
33. TenorioL.2001. Statistical regularization of inverse problems. SIAM Review43, 347–366.
    [Google Scholar]
34. UrsinB.1977. Seismic velocity estimation. Geophysical Prospecting25, 658–666.
    [Google Scholar]