Airborne gravity tests in the Italian area to improve the geoid model of Italy

References

1. BarzaghiR., BettiB., BorghiA., SonaG. and TornatoreV.2002. The Italian quasi‐geoid ITALGEO99. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini1, 33–51.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BorghiA., CarrionD. and SonaG.2007. Validation and fusion of different databases in preparation of high‐resolution geoid determination. Geophysical Journal International171, 539–549.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BrozenaJ.M.1992. The Greenland Aerogeophysics Project: Airborne gravity, topographic and magnetic mapping of an entire continent. In: From Mars to Greenland: Charting Gravity with Space and Airborne Instruments , pp. 203–214. Springer Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
4. ForsbergR.1981. Establishment of a LaCoste & Romberg Gravity Network in Greenland. Bulletin de Bureau Gravimetrique International46, 168–179.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ForsbergR.1994. Terrain effects in geoid computations. In: Lectures Notes of the International School for the Determination and Use of the Geoid , pp. 101–134. IGeS, DIIAR, Politecnico di Milano.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ForsbergR., OlesenA., BastosL., GidskehaugA., MeyerU. and TimmenL.2000. Airborne geoid determination. Earth, Planets and Space52, 863–866.
   [Google Scholar]
7. HarlanR.B.1968. Eötvös corrections for airborne gravitmetry. Journal of Geophysical Research73, 4675–4679.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HwangC., HsiaoY.‐S., ShihH.‐C., YangM., ChenK.‐H., ForsbergR. and OlesenA.V.2007. Geodetic and geophysical results from a Taiwan airborne gravity survey: Data reduction and accuracy assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research112, B04407.
   [Google Scholar]
9. P.Knudsen
   KnudsenP.2006. The GOCINA project. In: Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Vol. 25 (eds P.Knudsen , J.Johannessen , T.Gruber , S.Stammer and T.Van Dam . ECGS.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LemoineF.G., KenyonS.C., FactorJ.K., TrimmerR.G., PavlisN.K., ChinnD.S. et al . 1998. The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imaginery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA Report TP‐1998–206861, Goddard Space Flight Center.
11. R.J.L.Lane
    McLeanM., DamaskeD., DammV. and ReitmayrG.2004. Airborne gravity data acquisition and processing: A case study in the Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica. In: Airborne Gravity 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG‐PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop (ed. R.J.L.Lane ), pp. 1–5. Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18.
    [Google Scholar]
12. MoritzH.1989. Advanced Physical Geodesy . Wichmann , Karlsruhe . ISBN 3879071950.
    [Google Scholar]
13. OlesenA.V.2003. Improved airborne scalar gravimetry for regional gravity field mapping and geoid determination . PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.
14. TscherningC.C., KnudsenP. and ForsbergR.1994. Description of the GRAVSOFT package. Geophysical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Technical Report, 1991, 2. Ed. 1992, 3. Ed. 1993, 4. Ed. 1994.
15. TscherningC.C. and RappR.H.1974. Closed covariance expression for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations and the deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree‐variance models. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science, 208, The Ohio State University, Columbus , Ohio .
16. WenzelH.G.1999. Schwerefeldmodellierung durch ultrahochauflösende Kugelfunktionsmodelle. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen5, 144–154.
    [Google Scholar]