Infilling of sparse 3D data for 3D focusing operator estimation

References

1. Al‐YahyaK.1989. Velocity analysis by iterative profile migration. Geophysics54, 718–729.DOI: 10.1190/1.1442699
   [Google Scholar]
2. AminzadehF., BurkhardJ.M., LongJ., KunzT. and DuclosP.1996. Three dimensional SEG/EAGE models – an update. The Leading Edge15, 131–134.DOI: 10.1190/1.1437283
   [Google Scholar]
3. BerkhoutA.J.1997a. Pushing the limits of seismic imaging, part I: prestack migration in terms of double dynamic focusing. Geophysics62, 937–953.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BerkhoutA.J.1997b. Pushing the limits of seismic imaging, part II: integration of prestack migration, velocity estimation and avo analysis. Geophysics62, 954–969.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BerkhoutA.J.1999. Multiple removal based on the feedback model. The Leading Edge18, 127–131.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BerkhoutA.J. and VérschuurD.J.2000. Internal multiple removal boundary‐related and layer‐related approach. 62nd EAGE conference, Glasgow , Scotland , Extended Abstracts, L56.
7. BolteJ.F.B.2003. Estimation of focusing operators using the common focal point method . PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology .
8. BolteJ., VerschuurD. and HeggeR.1999. CFP operator estimation and inversion demonstrated on a field data set, part I: Operator updating. 69th SEG meeting, Houston , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1711–1714.
9. CoxB.E. and VerschuurD.J.2003. Tomographic inversion of 3D focusing operators using data‐driven parametrization. 65th EAGE conference, Stavanger , Norway , Extended Abstracts, D32.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GisolfA. and VerschuurD.2002. 3D focusing operator estimation from sparse 3D data. 64th EAGE conference, Florence , Italy , Extended Abstracts, E018.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HeggeR., DuijndamA., BolteJ. and FokkemaJ.1999. CFP operator estimation and inversion demonstrated on a field data set, part II: Velocity estimation. 69th SEG meeting, Houston , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1500–1503.
12. HeggeR.F., FokkemaJ.T. and DuijndamA.J.W.1998. Using focusing operators to estimate velocity models. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1608–1611.
13. HubralP., SchleicherJ. and TygelM.1996. A unified approach to 3D seismic reflection imaging, part I: Basic concepts. Geophysics61, 742–758.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444001
    [Google Scholar]
14. KabirM.M.N. and VerschuurD.J.2000. A constrained parametric inversion for velocity analysis based on the CFP technology. Geophysics65, 1210–1222.DOI: 10.1190/1.1444813
    [Google Scholar]
15. MortonS.A.1996. Automating prestack migration analysis using common focal point gathers. 66th SEG meeting, Denver , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 411–414.
16. ThorbeckeJ.W.1997. Common focus point technology . PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology .
17. VidaleJ.E.1990. Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions. Geophysics55, 521–526.DOI: 10.1190/1.1442863
    [Google Scholar]
18. WapenaarC.P.A., GoudswaardJ. and Van WijngaardenA.J.1999. Multi‐angle, multiscale inversion of migrated seismic data. The Leading Edge18, 928–932.DOI: 10.1190/1.1438409
    [Google Scholar]
19. WinthaegenP.L.A. and VerschuurD.J.2001. CFP‐approach to time‐lapse angle‐dependent reflectivity analysis. 71st SEG meeting, San Antonio , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1580–1583.