1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 37, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 37 Number 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The magnetometric resistivity (MMR) method uses a sensitive magnetometer to measure the low‐level, low‐frequency magnetic fields associated with the galvanic current flow between a pair of electrodes. While the MMR anomalies of simple structures such as dikes and vertical contacts have been determined analytically, there is a lack of systematic information on the expected responses from simple three‐dimensional bodies. We determine the characteristic anomalies associated with square, plate‐like conductors, which are excellent models of many base metal mineral deposits.

The anomalies of plates of finite size are determined numerically using an integral equation method. A plate is subdivided into many sections and the current flow within each section is solved by equating the electrical field within each section to the tangential electrical field just outside it. When the plate size is small in relation to either the depth or the transmitter spacing, the shape and amplitude of the anomaly produced is closely approximated by a current dipole model of the same length and depth. At the other extreme, a large plate is represented by a half‐plane. The dipole and half‐plane models are used to bracket the behaviour of plates of finite size.

The form of a plate anomaly is principally dependent on the shape, depth and orientation of the plate. A large, dipping plate near the surface produces a skewed anomaly highly indicative of its dip, but the amount of skew rapidly diminishes with increased depth or decreased size. Changes in plate conductivity affect the amplitude of the anomaly, but have little effect on anomaly shape. A current channelling parameter, determined from the conductivity contrast, can thus be used to scale the amplitude of an anomaly whose basic shape has been determined from geometrical considerations.

The separation into geometrical and electrical factors greatly simplifies both the interpretation and modelling of MMR anomalies, particularly in situations with multiple plates. An empirical formula, using this separation, predicts the anomaly of two or more parallel plates with different conductances. In addition, the relation between the resolution of two vertical, parallel plates of equal conductance and their separation is determined.

The ability of the integral equation method to model plate‐like structures is demonstrated with the interpretation of an MMR anomaly in a survey conducted at Cork Tree Well in Western Australia. The buried conductor, a mineralized graphitic zone, is modelled with a vertical, bent plate. The depth to the top of the plate, and the plate conductance, is adjusted to fit the anomaly amplitude as closely as possible. From the modelling it would appear that this zone is not solely responsible for the observed anomaly.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02222.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02222.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berdichevskiy, M.N. AND Dmitriev, V.I.1976. Basic principles of interpretation of magneto‐telluric curves. Geoelectric and Geothermal Studies (East‐Central Europe, Soviet Asia): KAPG Geophysics Monographs, Adam, A. (ed.), 165–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheesman, S.J.1985. The effect of current channelling in square plates with applications to MMR. Research in Applied Geophysics, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards, R.N.1974. The magnetometric resistivity method and its application to the mapping of a fault. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences11, 1136–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Edwards, R.N.1983. An approximate model of the magnetometric resistivity (MMR) and magnetic induced polarization (MIP) responses of dipping dikes beneath a conductive overburden. Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 14, 30–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards, N.R.1984. The cross‐hole magnetometric resistivity (MMR) response of a disc conductor. Geophysical Prospecting32, 955–969.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards, R.N., Law, L.K. AND White, A.1971. Geomagnetic variations in the British Isles and their relationship to electrical currents in the ocean and shallow seas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London), A 270, 289–323.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards, R.N., Lee, H. AND Nabighian, M.N.1978. On the theory of magnetometric resistivity (MMR) methods. Geophysics43, 1176–1203.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Flores, C. AND Edwards, R.N.1989. Approximate calculations of low frequency three‐dimensional magnetotelluric responses using a multiple plate model. Geophysics (in press).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomez‐Trevino, E. AND Edwards, R.N.1979. Magnetometric resistivity (MMR) anomalies of two‐dimensional structures. Geophysics44, 947–958.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Howland‐Rose, A.W.1984. The use of RRMIP as a regional mapping tool with examples from the Eastern Goldfields of W.A. Geophysical Exploration for Precambrian Gold Deposits, Doyle, H.A. (ed.), 10, 139–164. University of Western Australia, Geology Department and Extension Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LeMouel, J.L. AND Menvielle, M.1982. Geomagnetic variation anomalies and deflection of telluric currents. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society68, 575–587.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McNeill, J.D., Edwards, R.N. aND Levy, G.M.1984. Approximate calculations of the transient electromagnetic response from buried conductors in a conductive half‐space. Geophysics49, 918–924.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nabighian, M.N., Oppliger, G.L., Edwards, R.N., Lo, B.B.H. aND Cheesman, S.J.1984. Cross‐hole magnetometric resistivity (MMR). Geophysics49, 1313–1326.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stefanescu, S.S.1929. Theoretical studies of electrical prospecting of the subsurface. Studii Technice si Economica. Academie de la Republique Populaire Romaine14, No. 1 [in French].
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Stefanescu, S.S.1958. Uber die magnetische Wirkung einiger heterogener Medien in der elektrischen Bodenforschung. Zeitschrift für Geophysik24, 175–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stefanescu, S.S. AND Nabighian, M.N.1962. Uber magnetische storfelder als folge senkrechter schichtungen im gleischstrom. Revue de Geologie et de Geographie. Academie de la Republique Populaire Roumaine6, 139–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wannamaker, P.E., Hohmann, G.W. AND SanFilipo, W.A.1984. Electromagnetic modeling of three‐dimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations. Geophysics49, 60–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wannamaker, P.E., Hohmann, G.W. AND Ward, S.H.1984. Magnetotelluric responses of three‐dimensional bodies in layered earths. Geophysics49, 1517–1533.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. West, G.F. AND Edwards, R.N.1985. A simple parametric model for the electromagnetic response of an anomalous body in a host medium. Geophysics50, 2542–2557.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02222.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error