1887
Volume 38 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The time‐varying deconvolution operator designed by dividing time‐varying sequence has been extended to include an optimal division of the input data. A numerical example illustrates that the error energy is less in the case of optimally divided input in comparison with arbitrary division.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01853.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berndt, H. and Cooper, G.R.1965. An optimum observation time for estimates of time‐varying correlation function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory11, 307–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Box, G.E.P. and Muller, M.E.1958. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics29, 610–611.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke, G.K.C.1968. Time‐varying deconvolution filter. Geophysics33, 936–944.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Crump, N.D.1974. A Kalman filter approach to the deconvolution of seismic signals. Geophysics39, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dash, Bibhu, P. and Obaidullah, K. Ahmed1970. Determination of signal to noise statistics using correlation theory. Geophysics35, 24–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dimri, V.P.1986. On the time‐varying Wiener filter. Geophysical Prospecting34, 904–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimri, V.P. and Srivastava, K.1987. Ideal performance criteria for deconvolution operators. Geophysical Prospecting35, 539–547.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Griffiths, L.J., Smolka, F.R. and Trembly, L.D.1977. Adaptive deconvolution: a new technique for processing time‐varying seismic data. Geophysics42, 742–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Koehler, F. and Taner, M.T.1985. The use of conjugate‐gradient algorithm in the computation of predictive deconvolution operators. Geophysics50, 2752–2758.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Negi, J.G., Dimri, V.P., Agarwal, P.K. and Pandey, O.P.1986. Spectral analysis of aero‐magnetic profiles for thickness estimation of flood basalts of India. Exploration Geophysics17, 105–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Robinson, E.A. and Treitel, S.1980. Geophysical Signal Analysis. Prentice‐Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Treitel, S.1970. Principles of digital multichannel filtering. Geophysics35, 785–811.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Treitel, S.1974. An ideal performance property of multichannel Wiener filter. Journal of the Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists10, (1), 71–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Treitel, S., Clement, W.G. and Kaul, R.K.1971. The spectral determination of depths to buried magnetic basement rocks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society24, 425–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, R.J.1969. The determination of optimum gate length for time‐varying Wiener filtering. Geophysics34, 683–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, R.J. and Treitel, S.1973. The determination of digital Wiener filter by means of gradient methods. Geophysics38, 310–326.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01853.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error