3D AND 2½ D MODELLING OF GRAVITY ANOMALIES WITH VARIABLE DENSITY CONTRAST¹

References

1. Agarwal, B.N.P.1971a. Direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basin using digital computer ‐ part I. Pure and Applied Geophysics86, 5–12.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agarwal, B.N.P.1971b. Direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basin using digital computer ‐ part II. Pure and Applied Geophysics86, 13–17.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Athy, L.F.1930. Density, porosity and compaction of sedimentary rocks. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists14, 1–24.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bhaskara Rao, D.1986. Modelling of sedimentary basins from gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society84, 207–212.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bott, M.H.P.1960. The use of rapid digital computing methods for direct gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society3, 63–67.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chai, Y. and Hinze, W.J.1988. Gravity inversion of an interface above which the density contrast varies exponentially with depth. Geophysics53, 837–845.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cordell, L.1973. Gravity analysis using an exponential density‐depth function ‐ San Jacinto graben, California. Geophysics38, 684–690.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cordell, L. and Henderson, R.G.1968. Iterative three‐dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer. Geophysics33, 596–601.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Enmark, T.1981. A versatile interactive computer program for computation and automatic optimization of gravity models. Geoexploration19, 47–66.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Granser, H.1987. Three‐dimensional interpretation of gravity data from sedimentary basins using an exponential density‐depth function. Geophysical Prospecting35, 1030–1041.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hedberg, H.1936. The gravitational compaction of clays and shales. American Journal of Science31, 241–287.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Howell, L.G., Heintz, K.O. and Barry, A.1966. The development and use of a high precision down hole gravity meter. Geophysics31, 764–772.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hughes, D.S. and Cooke, C.E.1953. The effect of pressure on the reduction of pore volume of consolidated sandstones. Geophysics18, 298–309.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Murthy, I.V.R. and Rao, D.B.1979. Gravity anomalies of two‐dimensional bodies of irregular cross‐section with density contrast varying with depth. Geophysics44, 1525–1530.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nagy, D.1966. The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics31, 362–371.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rasmussen, R. and Pedersen, L.B.1979. End corrections in potential field modelling. Geophysical Prospecting27, 749–760.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Talwani, M. and Ewing, M.1960. Rapid computation of gravitational attraction of three‐dimensional bodies of arbitrary shape. Geophysics25, 203–225.
    [Google Scholar]