1887
Volume 38 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Spectral analysis is one of the most ubiquitous signal processing tools used in exploration geophysics. Among many applications, it is used simply to look at the frequency content of seismic traces, to find notches, to estimate wavelets under the minimum‐phase assumption, and to match broadband synthetic seismograms to seismic data.

Seismic spectra exhibit very large dynamic ranges, particularly at low frequencies. Estimation of low‐frequency decay is very important for accurate modelling. However, when using traditional spectral estimates incorporating smoothing windows, too much sidelobe energy leaks from high power into low power areas, spoiling our ability to estimate low‐frequency spectral decay. The multitaper method of spectral analysis due to D. Thomson does not employ just a single window, but rather a set of orthogonal data tapers. It is possible to have much less sidelobe contamination, while maintaining a stable estimate.

The trace is tapered by each of a subset of the orthogonal tapers, and a raw spectral estimate produced in each case. These are combined to produce a final spectral estimate. The technique can be made by applying different weights to the different raw spectra at different frequencies.

A comparison of seismic spectral estimation using this multitaper technique with a traditional approach having the same analysis bandwidth and stability demonstrates the very different estimates of spectral decay in the areas of high dynamic range. The multitaper approach provides estimates with much reduced sidelobe leakage, and hence is a very appealing method for reflection seismology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01834.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Golub, G. and Van Loan, C.1983. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Papoulis, A.1973. Minimum‐bias windows for high‐resolution spectral estimates. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory19, 9–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Park, J., Lindberg, C.R. and Vernon, F. L.1987. Multitaper spectral analysis of high‐frequency seismograms. Journal of Geophysical ResearchB12, 12675–12684.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Priestley, M. B.1981. Spectral Analysis and Time Series, Volume 1. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shanks, J. L.1967. Recursion filters for digital processing. Geophysics, 32, 33–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Slepian, D.1978. Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty. V. The discrete case. Bell System Technical Journal57, 1371–1430.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thomson, D.J.1982. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers70, 1055–1096.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Walden, A. T.1988. Computational considerations for Thomson's multitaper method of improved spectral estimation. British Petroleum Report EXT 49765.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01834.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error