1887
Volume 47 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

The surface nuclear magnetic resonance (SNMR) method has been tested at a site in Haldensleben, northern Germany, to assess the suitability of this new method for groundwater exploration and environmental investigations. More information is obtained by SNMR, particularly with respect to aquifer parameters, than with other geophysical techniques. SNMR measurements were carried out at three borehole locations, together with 2D and 1D direct current geoelectrics, as well as ground‐penetrating radar, and well logging (induction log, gamma‐ray log and pulsed neutron‐gamma log). Permeabilities were calculated from the grain‐size distributions of core material determined in the laboratory. It is demonstrated that the SNMR method is able to detect groundwater and the results are in good agreement with other geophysical and hydrogeological data. Using the SNMR method, the water content of the unsaturated and saturated zones (i.e. porosity of an aquifer) can be reliably determined. This information and resistivity data permit determination of other aquifer parameters. Comparison of the SNMR results with borehole data clearly shows that the water content determined by SNMR is the free or mobile water in the pores. The permeabilities estimated from the SNMR decay times are similar to those derived from sieve analysis of core material. Thus, the combination of SNMR with geoelectric methods promises to be a powerful tool for studying aquifer properties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00161.x
2001-12-24
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArchieG.E.1942. The electrical resistivity as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers. 146,5462.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarringerA.R. & WhiteJ.F.1968. Groundwater survey method and apparatus. US Patent 3, 398,355.
  3. BeauceA., BernardJ., LegchenkoA., VallaP.1996. Une nouvelle méthode géophysique pour les études hydrogéologiques: l'application de la résonance magnétique nucléaire. Hydrogéologie1,7177.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeyerW.1964. Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilung. Wasserwirtschaft-Wassertechnik (WWT)14,165169.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BeyerW. & SchweigerK.H.1969. Zur Bestimmung des entwässerbaren Porenanteils der Grundwasserleiter. Wasserwirtschaft-Wassertechnik (WWT)19,5760.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BlochF., HansenW.W., PackardM.E.1946. The nuclear induction experiment. Physical Review70,474485.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CarrH.Y. & PurcellE.M.1954. Effects of diffusion on free precession experiments. Physical Review94,630.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChandlerR.M., KenyonW.E., MorrissC.E.1987. Reliable nuclear magnetism logging — with examples in effective porosity and residual oil saturation. Transactions SPWLA, Paper C.
  9. DavisN.S. & De WiestR.J.M.1966. Hydrogeology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  10. GevI., GoldmannM., RabinovichB., RabinovichM., IssarA.1996. Detection of the water level in fractured phreatic aquifers using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) geophysical measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics33,277282.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GoldmanM., RabinovichB., RabinovichM., GiladD., GevI., SchirovM.1994. Application of the integrated NMR‐TDEM method in groundwater exploration in Israel. Journal of Applied Geophysics31,2752.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HöltingB.1992. Hydrogeologie. Enke‐Verlag.
  13. KenyonW.E.1992. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a petrophysical measurement. Nuclear Geophysics6 (2), 153171.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LegchenkoA.V., SemenovA.G., SchirovM.D.1990. A device for measurement of subsurface water saturated layers parameters. USSR Patent 1540515 (in Russian).
  15. LegchenkoA.V. & ShushakovO.A.1998. Inversion of surface NMR data. Geophysics63,7584.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LegchenkoA.V., ShushakovO.A., PerrinJ.A., PortselanA.A.1995. Noninvasive NMR study of subsurface aquifers in France. 65th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 365367.
  17. LieblichD.A., LegchenkoA., HaeniF.P., PortselanA.A.1994. Surface nuclear magnetic resonance experiments to detect subsurface water at Haddam Meadows, Connecticut. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2, Boston, USA, pp. 717736.
  18. LokeM.H. & BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44,131152.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LorenJ.D.1972. Permeability estimates from NML measurements. Journal of Petroleum Technology25,923928.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MeiboomS. & GillD.1958. Compensation for pulse imperfections in Carr–Purcell NMR experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments29,688.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PurcellE.M., TorreyH.C., PoundR.V.1946. Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moment in a solid. Physical Review69,3738.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SchirovM., LegchenkoA., CreerG.1991. A new direct non‐invasive groundwater detection technology for Australia. Exploration Geophysics22,333338.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SeeversD.O.1966. A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones. Transactions SPWLA, Paper L.
  24. SemenovA.G.1987. NMR hydroscope for water prospecting. Proceedings of the Seminar on Geotomography, Indian Geophysical Union, Hyderabad, pp. 6667.
  25. SemenovA.G., BurshteinA.I., PusepA.Y., SchirovM.D.1988. A device for measurement of underground mineral parameters. USSR Patent 1079063 (in Russian).
  26. SemenovA.G., PusepA.Y., SchirovM.D.1982. Hydroscope — an installation for prospecting without drilling. USSR Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, pp. 126 (in Russian).
  27. SemenovA.G., SchirovM.D., LegchenkoA.V., BurshteinA.I., PusepA.Y.1989. Device for measuring the parameters of underground mineral deposits. Great Britain Patent 2198540B.
  28. ShushakovO.A.1996. Groundwater NMR in conductive water. Geophysics61,9981006.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ShushakovO.A. & LegchenkoA.V.1992. Calculation of the proton magnetic resonance signal from groundwater considering the electroconductivity of the medium. Russian Academy of Science, Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Novosibirsk 36,126 (in Russian).
  30. StraleyC., MorrissC.E., KenyonW.E., HowardJ.J.1991. NMR in partially saturated rocks: laboratory insights on free fluid index and comparison with borehole logs. SPWLA, 32nd Annual Logging Symposium, pp. 125.
  31. TimurA.1968. An investigation of permeability, porosity and residual water saturation relationships. Transactions SPWLA, Paper K.
  32. TimurA.1969 a. Producable porosity and permeability of sandstones investigated through nuclear magnetic resonance principles. The Log Analyst10,, 311.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. TimurA.1969 b. Pulsed magnetic resonance studies of porosity, movable fluid and permeability of sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Technology21,775786.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. TrushkinD.V., ShushakovO.A., LegchenkoA.V.1994. The potential of a noise‐reducing antenna for surface NMR groundwater surveys in the earth's magnetic field. Geophysical Prospecting42,855862.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. TrushkinD.V., ShushakovO.A., LegchenkoA.V.1995. Surface NMR applied to an electroconductive medium. Geophysical Prospecting43,623633.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. VarianR.H.1962. Ground liquid prospecting method and apparatus. US Patent 3019383.
  37. WilsonL.G., EverettL.G., CullenSt.J. (eds) 1995. Handbook of Vadose Zone Characterization and Monitoring. Lewis Publishers.
  38. YaramanciU., LangeG., KnödelK.1998. Effects of regularization in the inversion of surface NMR measurements. 60th EAGE conference, Leipzig, Germany, Extended Abstracts, 1018.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00161.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00161.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error