1887
Volume 23 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Pseudo‐velocity‐logs are tentative determinations of subsurface velocity variations with depth, using both information of seismic amplitude and reflection curvature.

A rigorous theoretical method would consist in

  • a)   deconvolving the seismic traces to remove the filtering effects of the ground and of the recording equipment
  • b)   demultiplying the deconvolved traces by a complete desynthesization with convergence criteria
  • c)   computing the velocities.

While this method works with synthetic examples, it is not generally applicable to field cases, one of the reasons being the poor reliability of desynthesization in the presence of noise.

The present method is a compromise between a rigorous and a practical process: the complete desynthesization is not performed; deconvolution and demultiplication are done by more classical techniques using real amplitudes; absolute velocities are determined to fit both the reflection coefficients and the rms velocities. It leads to pseudovelocity‐logs, accurate enough to show lithologic variations, smoothed enough to preserve the signal/noise ratio.

Examples are shown of Flexichoc profiles recorded in 2500 m (8000–9000 feet) deep areas of the Mediterranean Sea. Pseudo‐velocity‐logs show 1000 m (3000 feet) of a velocity‐increasing‐with‐depth Plio‐pleistocene marl formation, overlying Miocene evaporites. Intercalations of high and low‐velocity layers in the evaporites seem to indicate vertical facies variations.

The Pseudo‐velocity‐log, associated with other lithologic determination processes, should become a geological tool for deep offshore exploration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01554.x
2006-04-27
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BOIS, P., 1968, Détermination de l'impulsion sismique, Geoph. Prosp.16, 4–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DELAS, C., BEAUCHAMP, J. B., DE LOMBARES, G., FOURMANN, J. M., et POSTIC, A., 1970, An example of practical velocity determinations from seismic traces, 32nd E.A.E.G. Meeting, May 20–22, Edinburgh .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Geophysical Society of Houston
    Geophysical Society of Houston , 1973, Lithology and direct detection of hydrocarbons using geophysical methods, Symposium, Oct. 8 and 9, Houston .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HEMON, C., 1966, Filtrages inverses dans le cas de l'incidence normale, dans Le Filtrage en Sismique, I, 111–146, Editions Technip, Paris .
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KUNETZ, G., 1961, Essai d'analyse de traces sismiques, Geophys. Prosp.9, 317–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KUNETZ, G., 1963, Quelques exemples d'analyse d'enregistrements sismiques, Geophys. Prosp.11, 409–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. NEWMAN, P., 1973, Divergence effects in a layered earth, Geophysics38, 481–488.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. O'DOHERTY, R. F., et ANSTEY, N. A., 1971, Reflection on amplitudes, Geophys. Prosp.19, 430–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. RICE, R. B., 1962, Inverse convolution filters, Geophysics18, 4–18.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1975.tb01554.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error