1887
Volume 5 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A brief description of the procedure usually adopted for ascertaining the accuracy o aeromagnetic data is given as a background to the discussion of factors which affect this accuracy. These factors fall mainly into two groups: spatial positioning, i.e. relation to the ground surface, and effects contributing to the observed relative magnetic values. The evaluation of the observed anomalies in terms of the most probable causes and the anomalies themselves are directly influenced by the amount of the available control of factors mentioned above. The effects of various factors, such as plan positioning, height keeping, diurnal drift, are discussed, the arguments being based on theoretical and practical premises.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1957.tb01445.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agocs, W. B., 1955, The effect of line spacing illustrated by Marmora, Ontario Airborne Magnetometer Control and the determination of the optimum spacing, Geophysics, Vol. XX, No. 4, p. 871.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bruckshaw, J.McG., Private communications.
  3. Cahill, L. J. and J. A.Van Allen, 1956, High Altitude Measurements of the Earth's Magnetic Field with a Proton Precession Magnetometer, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 61, No. 3, p. 547.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Maple, J. E. and W. A.Bowen, 1951, Evidence for Ionosphere currents from Rocket Experiments near the Geomagnetic Equator, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 56, No. 2, p. 265.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1957.tb01445.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error