1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 36, Issue 8
  5. Article
Volume 36 Number 8
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Resistivity measurements were carried out in a survey area in the south of Germany. This area is characterized by complicated subsurface geology. Schlumberger full‐arrays and their respective half‐arrays were recorded simultaneously. The results obtained by the one‐dimensional (1D) interpretation of the full‐array measurements were incorrect because of a resistivity discontinuity. This discontinuity, under a relatively thick overburden, could only be located by the half‐array soundings. Its exact location and the resistivity distribution in the subsurface were ascertained by comparing the sounding curves with 2D model curves, which are calculated by a finite‐difference method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02202.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02202.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DEY, A. and MORRISON, H.F.1979. Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped two‐dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting27, 106–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KAROUS, M. and PERNU, T.K.1985. Combined sounding‐profiling resistivity measurements with the three‐electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting33, 447–459.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KOEFOED, O.1979. Geosounding Principles, 1, Resistivity Sounding Measurements. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LEE, C.Y.1973. The dipping layer problem in resistivity. Colorado School of Mines, T‐1610, Ph.D. thesis.
  5. MAEDA, K.1955. Apparent resistivity for dipping beds. Geophysics20, 123–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MUFTI, I.R.1980. Finite‐difference evaluation of apparent resistivity curves. Geophysical Prospecting28, 146–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MUNDRY, E.1984. Geoelectrical model calculations for two‐dimensional resistivity distributions. Geophysical Prospecting32, 124–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MUNDRY, E. and DENNERT, U.1980. Das Umkehrproblem in der Geoelektrik. Geologisches Jahrbuch E19, 19–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MUNDRY, E. and SÜDEKUM, W.1982. Erfassung und Verarbeitung geoelektrischer Meβdaten mit einem programmierbaren Tischrechner. Geologisches Jahrbuch E23, 261–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. VAN NOSTRAND, R.G. and COOK, K.L.1966. Interpretation of Resistivity Data. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZOHDY, A.R.1970. Variable azimuth Schlumberger sounding and profiling near a vertical contact. U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin1313‐A, 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02202.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error