1887
Volume 56, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Deviation of earthquakes from the double‐couple mechanism is an important, but delicate tool to study their source processes. For assessing the double‐couple percentage, the paper suggests to complement the standard least‐square moment‐tensor retrieval with a hierarchic spatio‐temporal grid search, progressively closer to the true source position and time. It enables identification of the double‐couple percentage convergence, while its limit is the resulting double‐couple percentage value, or range. The so‐called double‐couple percentage (DC%) versus correlation plots are introduced and difficulties of the double‐couple percentage assessment are discussed. It is proved that even close to the true source position, where the strike‐dip‐rake angles are already stable (within a few degrees), the double‐couple percentage may still vary by dozens of per cent. Moreover, even at the optimum spatial position, the double‐couple percentage estimate is extremely sensitive (0 to 100%) to small variations of the subevent origin time. This behaviour is explained in terms of the source complexity, implying a time‐dependent moment tensor. Therefore, the double‐couple percentage of complex events depends on the studied frequency band and, in general, also on the station azimuth. This explains broad variations of the double‐couple percentage reports among seismic agencies. Three earthquakes of mutually close epicentres were investigated (Zakynthos, Western Greece, April 2006, magnitudes ∼5.5) and a strong non‐double‐couple component of one of them was identified (double‐couple percentage of about 20%). Two equivalent models of this earthquake were found: a single‐event non‐ double‐couple model, and a double‐event model consisting of two double‐couple sources with highly different mechanisms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00671.x
2008-04-21
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArdeleanuL., RadulianM., SilenyJ. and PanzaG.F.2005. Source parameters of weak crustal earthquakes of the Vrancea region from short‐period waveform inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics162, 495–513.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BenetatosC., DregerD. and KiratziA.2007. Complex and segmented rupture associated with the 14 August 2003Mw 6.2 Lefkada, Ionian Islands, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97, 35–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BernardiF., BraunmillerJ., KradolferU. and GiardiniD.2004. Automatic regional moment tensor inversion in the European‐Mediterranean region. Geophysical Journal International157, 703–716.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BouchonM.1981. A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America71, 959–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BouchonM.2003. A review of the discrete wavenumber method. Pure and Applied Geophysics160, 445–465.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BraunmillerJ. and BernardiF.2005. The 2003 Boumerdes, Algeria earthquake: Regional moment tensor analysis. Geophysical Research Letters32, L06305.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BufornE., CescaS., GodedT., Del FresnoC. and MunozD.2006. The Bullas (Murcia, SE Spain) earthquake, 29 January 2005. Journal of Seismology10, 65–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CampusP. and FaehD.1997. Seismic monitoring of explosions: A method to extract information on the isotropic component of the seismic source. Journal of Seismology1, 205–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CescaS., BufornE. and DahmT.2006. Amplitude spectra moment tensor inversion of shallow earthquakes in Spain. Geophysical Journal International166, 839–854.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ClintonJ.F., HaukssonE. and SolankiK.2006. An evaluation of the SCSN moment tensor solutions: Robustness of the Mw magnitude scale, style and automation of the method. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1689–1705.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DahmT., HoralekJ. and SilenyJ.2000. Comparison of absolute and relative moment tensor solutions for the January 1997West Bohemia earthquake swarm. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica44, 233–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DahmT., MantheiG. and EisenblaetterJ.1999. Automated moment tensor inversion to estimate source mechanisms of hydraulically induced micro‐seismicity in salt rock. Tectonophysics306, 1–17
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DregerD. and WoodsB.2002. Regional distance seismic moment tensors of nuclear explosions. Tectonophysics356, 139–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FoulgerG.R. and JulianB.R.1993. Non‐double‐couple earthquakes at the Hengill‐Grensdalur volcanic complex, Iceland: Are they artefacts of crustal heterogeneity?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83, 38–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FoulgerG.R., JulianB.R., HillD.P., PittA.M., MalinP.E. and ShalevE.2004. Non‐double‐couple microearthquakes at Long Valley caldera, California, provide evidence for hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research132, 45–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FrohlichC., RiedeselM.A. and AppersonK.D.1989. Note concerning possible mechanisms for non‐double‐couple earthquake sources. Geophysical Research Letters16, 523–526.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FrohlichC.1995. Characteristics of well‐determined non‐double‐couple earthquakes in the Harvard CMT catalog. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors91, 213–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HagosL., ShomaliH. and RobertsR.2006. Re‐evaluation of focal depths and source mechanisms of selected earthquakes in the Afar depression. Geophysical Journal International167, 297–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HaslingerF., KisslingE., AnsorgeJ., HatzfeldD., PapadmitriouE., KarakostasV., MakropoulosK., KahleH.‐G. and PeterY.1999. 3D crustal structure from local earthquake tomography around the Gulf of Arta (Ionian region, NW Greece). Tectonophysics304, 201–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HenryC., WoodhouseJ.H. and DasS.2002. Stability of earthquake moment tensor inversions: Effect of the double‐couple constraint. Tectonophysics356, 115–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HoralekJ., SilenyJ., FischerT., SlancovaA. and BouskovaA.2000. Scenario of the January 1997West Bohemia Earthquake Swarm. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica44, 491–521.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HoralekJ., SilenyJ. and FischerT.2002. Moment tensors of the January 1997earthquake swarm in NW Bohemia (Czech Republic): Double‐couple vs. non‐double‐couple events. Tectonophysics356, 65–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. JechumtalovaZ. and SilenyJ.2001. Point‐source parameters from noisy waveforms: Error estimate by Monte‐Carlo simulation. Pure and Applied Geophysics158, 1639–1654.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. JulianB.R., MillerA.D. and FoulgerG.R.1998. Non‐double‐couple earthquake 1. Theory. Reviews of Geophysics36, 525–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. JulianB.R. and FoulgerG.R.2004. Microearthquake focal mechanisms – A tool for monitoring geothermal systems. Geothermal Resources Council Bulletin33, 166–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KaganY.Y.2003. Accuracy of modern global earthquake catalogs. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors135, 173–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. KikuchiM. and KanamoriH.1991. Inversion of complex body waves – III. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America81, 2335–2350.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. KnopoffL. and RandallM.I.1970. The compensated linear vector dipole: A possible mechanism for deep earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research75, 4957–4963.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MillerA.D., FoulgerG.R. and JulianB.R.1998. Non‐double‐couple earthquake 2. Observations. Reviews of Geophysics36, 551–568.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nolen‐HoeksmaR.C. and RuffL.J.2001. Moment tensor of microseisms from the B‐sand propped hydrofracture, M‐site, Colorado. Tectonophysics336, 163–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PasyanosM.E., DregerD.S. and RomanowiczB.1996. Toward real‐time estimation of regional moment tensors. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, 1255–1269.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PondrelliS., SalimbeniS., EkströmG., MorelliA., GasperiniP. and VannucciG.2006. The Italian CMT dataset from 1977 to the present. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors159, 286–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RoumeliotiZ., BenetatosCh., KiratziA., StavrakakisG. and MelisN.2004. A study of the 2 December 2002(M5.5) Vartholomio (western Peloponnese, Greece) earthquake and of its largest aftershocks. Tectonophysics387, 65–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. RiedeselM.A. and JordanT.H.1989. Display and assessment of seismic moment tensors. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America79, 85–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. RuedaJ. and MezcuaJ.2005. Near‐real‐time seismic moment‐tensor determination in Spain. Seismological Research Letters76, 455–465.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. RutledgeJ.T., PhillipsW.S. and MayerhoferM.J.2004. Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: An interpretation of hydraulic‐fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, Texas. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 1817–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SaraoA., PanzaG.F., PriviteraE. and CocinaO.2001. Non‐double‐couple mechanisms in the seismicity preceding the 1991–1993 Etna volcano eruption. Geophysical Journal International145, 319–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SilenyJ.1998. Earthquake source parameters and their confidence regions by a genetic algorithm with a ‘memory’. Geophysical Journal International134, 228–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. SilenyJ. and HofstetterR.2002. Moment tensor of the 1999 Dead Sea calibration shot: Limitations in the isotropic source retrieval without a detailed earth model. Tectonophysics356, 157–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. SilenyJ. and MilevA.2006. Seismic moment tensor resolution on a local scale: Simulated rockburst and mine‐induced seismic events in the Kopanang gold mine, South Africa. Pure and Applied Geophysics163, 1495–1513.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. SokosE. and ZahradnikJ.2008. ISOLA – A Fortran code and a Matlab GUI to perform multiple‐point source inversion of seismic data. Computers and Geosciences, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. SomervilleP., IrikuraK., GravesR., SawadaS., WaldD., AbrahamsonN., IwasakiY., KagawaT., SmithN. and KowadaA.1999. Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seismological Research Letters70, 59–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. TocheportA., RiveraL. and Van Der WoerdJ.2006. A study of the November 2001Kokoxili Earthquake: History and geometry of the rupture from teleseismic data and field observations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1729–1740.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. ThioH.K. and KanamoriH.1996. Source complexity of the 1994 Northridge earthquake and its relation to aftershock mechanisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, S84–S92.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. TselentisG.‐A., SokosE., MartakisN. and SerpetsidakiA.2006. Seismicity and seismotectonics in Epirus, Western Greece: Results from a microearthquake survey. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1706–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. ValleeM. and BouchonM.2004. Imaging coseismic rupture in far field by slip patches. Geophysical Journal International156, 615–630.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. VascoD.W.1990. Moment‐tensor invariants: Searching for non‐double couple earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America80, 354–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. VavrycukV.2001. Inversion for parameters of tensile earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research106, 16.339–16.355.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. VavrycukV.2002. Non‐double‐couple earthquakes of 1997 January in West Bohemia, Czech Republic: Evidence of tensile faulting. Geophysical Journal International149, 365–374.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. VavrycukV.2004. Inversion for anisotropy from non‐double‐couple components of moment tensors. Journal of Geophysical Research109, B07306.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. VavrycukV.2007. On the retrieval of moment tensors from borehole data. Geophysical Prospecting55, 381–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. WeberZ.2006. Probabilistic local waveform inversion for moment tensor and hypocentral location. Geophysical Journal International165, 607–621.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. YungaS., LutikovA. and MolchanovO.2005. Non‐double‐couple seismic sources, faults interaction and hypothesis of self‐organized criticality. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences5, 11–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. ZahradnikJ., SerpetsidakiA., SokosE. and TselentisG.‐A.2005. Iterative deconvolution of regional waveforms and double‐event interpretation of the 2003 Lefkada earthquake, Greece. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95, 159–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. ZahradnikJ. and PlesingerA.2005. Long‐period pulses in broadband records of near earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95, 1928–1939.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. ZolloA. and BernardP.1989. S‐wave polarization inversion of the 15 October 1979 23:19 Imperial Valley aftershock: Evidence for anisotropy and a simple source mechanism. Geophysical Research Letters16, 1047–1050.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00671.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00671.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error