1887
Volume 38 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

Many conventional schemes of automated residual statics estimate time lags between prestack traces (sorted as CDP gathers) and a model section, and transform the collected lags into surface‐consistent residuals. The method discussed in this paper aims at improving the lag estimator. ‘Externally generated’ reference traces are avoided and a principle of localized stack optimization is introduced whereby application of a multichannel filter to the stack and evaluation of the normalized power of every filtered trace gives a measure of the stack quality. One may consider the power as a function of all variable (inconsistent) shifts applied to the prestack traces. To obtain a set of optimal lag estimates the power function must be maximized. This power function is complex and the number of its variables prohibits a straightforward search for the maximum. Thus an iterative method must be employed, and steepest descent schemes have proved the most satisfactory. In the actual calculation, the repeated evaluation of the objective can be replaced by the computation of certain cross‐correlations. At the last iteration (after five to ten coordinate sweeps), the global behaviour of this correlation gives some indications of how well a prestack trace is adapted to the filtered stack. This information is used to compute a weighting factor to be stored with the lag estimate. At this stage simple statistical procedures are run to eliminate the most unlikely estimates. The remaining ones are transformed to surface‐consistent residuals by means of a weighted least‐squares inversion according to a model which takes into account the fact that the lags have no fixed reference datum.

The efficiency of the method is demonstrated by a field data example into which synthetic anomalies were introduced, and the effect of the new process is compared with that of a ‘classical’ production program using field data with genuine static problems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01864.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bard, Y.1974. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Censor, Y.1981. Row‐action methods for huge and sparse systems and their applications. SIAM Review23, 444–446.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hammersley, J.M. and Handscomb, D.C.1964. Monte Carlo Methods. Chapman and Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirchheimer, F.1986. Robust residual statics by means of intertrace lag estimates. 56th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas . Expanded Abstracts589–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lines, L.R. and Treitel, S.1984. A review of least‐squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophysical Prospecting32, 159–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H. and Teller, E.1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics21, 1087–1092.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Paulson, K.1986. An efficient implementation of Monte Carlo statics. 56th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas . Expanded Abstracts595–597.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ronen, J. and Claerbout, J.F.1985. Surface‐consistent residual statics estimation by stack‐power maximization. Geophysics50, 2759–2767.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rothman, D.H.1985. Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics and residual statics estimation. Geophysics50, 2784–2796.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Taner, M.T., Koehler, F. and Alhilali, K.A.1974. Estimation and correction of near surface time anomalies. Geophysics39, 441–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wiggins, R.A., Larner, K.L. and Wisecup, R.C.1976. Residual static analysis as a general linear inverse problem. Geophysics41, 922–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YOUNG, D.M.1971. Iterative Solution of Large Linear Systems. Academic Press, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01864.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error