Seismic refraction traveltime inversion for static corrections in a glaciated shield rock environment: a case study

References

1. BergmanB., TryggvasonA. and JuhlinC.2006. Seismic tomography studies of cover thickness and near‐surface bedrock velocities. Geophysics71, U77–U84.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BohmG., AccainoF., RossiG. and TinivellaU.2006. Tomographic joint inversion of first arrivals in a real case from Saudi Arabia. Geophysical Prospecting54, 721–730.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BridleR.2007. Plus‐minus method to solve large‐amplitude near‐surface static corrections. Near Surface Geophysics5, 321–330.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BridleR., BarsoukovN., Al‐HomailiM., LeyR. and Al‐MustafaA.2006. Comparing state of the art near‐surface models of a seismic test line from Saudi Arabia. Geophysical Prospecting54, 667–680.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CarrB.J. and HajnalZ.1999. P‐ and S‐wave characterization of near‐surface reflectivity from glacial tills using vertical seismic profiles. Geophysics64, 970–980.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CarrB.J., HajnalZ. and PruggerA.1998. Shear‐wave studies in glacial till. Geophysics63, 1273–1284.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CholachP.Y., MolyneuxJ.B. and SchmittD.R.2005. Flin Flon Belt seismic anisotropy: elastic symmetry, heterogeneity, and shear‐wave splitting. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences42, 533–554.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChorkC.Y. and SalminenR.1993. Interpreting exploration geochemical data from Outokumpu, Finland: a MVE‐robust factor analysis. Journal of Geochemical Exploration48, 1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChristensenN.I.1996. Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth101, 3139–3156.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DochertyP.1992. Solving for the thickness and velocity of the weathering layer using 2‐D refraction tomography. Geophysics57, 1307–1318.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DomesF.2004. 2‐D Traveltime inversion of near surface refractions and reflection in support of hydrogeological studies. In: Geophysikalisches Institut . Universität Karlsruhe.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GodfreyN.J., ChristensenN.I. and OkayaD.A.2000. Anisotropy of schists: Contribution of crustal anisotropy to active source seismic experiments and shear wave splitting observations. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth105, 27991–28007.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HagedoornJ.G.1959. The plus‐minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophysical Prospecting7, 158–182.
    [Google Scholar]
14. JuhlinC., PalmH., MullernC.F. and WallbergB.2002. Imaging of groundwater resources in glacial deposits using high‐resolution reflection seismics, Sweden. Journal of Applied Geophysics51, 107–120.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KisslingE., EllsworthW.L., Eberhart‐PhillipsD. and KradolferU.1994. Initial reference models in local earthquake tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth99, 19635–19646.
    [Google Scholar]
16. KriegerM.H., HenkeC.H. and MullerC.2000. Static corrections derived from ultradense gravity surveying, inversion and 3‐D modeling of shallow salt and caprock structures. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, P4.
17. I.T.Kukkonen
    KukkonenI., HeikkinenP., EkdahlE., HjeltS.‐E., YliniemiJ., JalkanenE. et al . 2006. Acquisition and geophysical characteristics of reflection seismic data on FIRE transects, Fennoscandian Shield. In: Finnish Reflection Experiment 2001–2005 (eds I.T.Kukkonen and R.Lahtinen ), pp. 13–43. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 43. ISBN 9516909639.
    [Google Scholar]
18. the Outokumpu Deep Drilling Working Group I.T.Kukkonen
    KukkonenI.T. and the Outokumpu Deep Drilling Working Group . 2007. Outokumpu Deep Drilling Project – Introduction to geology and geophysics of the deep hole and research within the project. In: Outokumpu Deep Drilling Project, Second International Workshop (ed. I.T.Kukkonen ), pp. 11–16. Geological Survey of Finland, Southern Finland Office Marine Geology and Geophysics , Report Q10.2/2007/29.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LandaE., KeydarS. and KravtsovA.1995. Determination of a shallow velocity depth model from seismic‐refraction data by coherence inversion. Geophysical Prospecting43, 177–190.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LanzE., MaurerH. and GreenA.G.1998. Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site. Geophysics63, 1414–1433.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LeyR., AdolfsW., BridleR., Al‐HomailiM., VesnaverA. and RasP.2006. Ground viscosity and stiffness measurements for near surface seismic velocity. Geophysical Prospecting54, 751–762.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LuostoU., TiiraT., KorhonenH., AzbelI., BurminV., BuyanovA. et al . 1990. Crust and upper mantle structure along the DSS Baltic profile in SE Finland. Geophysical Journal International101, 89–110.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LuschenE., BramK., SollnerW. and SobolevS.1996. Nature of seismic reflections and velocities from VSP‐experiments and borehole measurements at the KTB deep drilling site in southeast Germany. Tectonophysics264, 309–326.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MillerK.C., Harder, S.H., AdamsD.C. and O'DonnellT.1998. Integrating high‐resolution refraction data into near‐surface seismic reflection data processing and interpretation. Geophysics63, 1339–1347.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Van OvermeerenR.A.2001. Hagedoorn's plus‐minus method: The beauty of simplicity. Geophysical Prospecting49, 687–696.
    [Google Scholar]
26. PrattR.G., SongZ.M., WilliamsonP. and WarnerM.1996. Two‐dimensional velocity models from wide‐angle seismic data by wavefield inversion. Geophysical Journal International124, 323–340.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ShengJ.M., LeedsA., BuddensiekM. and SchusterG.T.2006. Early arrival waveform tomography on near‐surface refraction data. Geophysics71, U47–U57.
    [Google Scholar]
28. I.Kukkonen
    Sorjonen‐WardP.2006. Geological and structural framework and preliminary interpretation of the FIRE 3 and FIRE 3A reflection seismic profiles, central Finland. In: Finnish Reflection Experiment 2001–2005 (eds I.Kukkonen and R.Lahtinen ), pp. 105–159. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 43. ISBN 9516909639.
    [Google Scholar]
29. StumpelH., KahlerS., MeissnerR. and MilkereitB.1984. The use of seismic shear‐waves and compressional waves for lithological problems of shallow sediments. Geophysical Prospecting32, 662–675.
    [Google Scholar]
30. VesnaverA., BridleR., HenryB., LeyR., RoweR. and WyllieA.2006. Geostatistical integration of near‐surface geophysical data. Geophysical Prospecting54, 763–777.
    [Google Scholar]
31. WhiteD.J.1989. Two‐dimensional seismic refraction tomography. Geophysical Journal-Oxford97, 223–245.
    [Google Scholar]
32. WhiteD.J. and BolandA.V.1992. A comparison of forward modeling and inversion of seismic 1st arrivals over the Kapuskasing uplift. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America82, 304–322.
    [Google Scholar]
33. YordkayhunS., JuhlinC., GieseR. and Cosm, C.2007. Shallow velocity‐depth model using first arrival traveltime inversion at the CO2SINK site, Ketzin, Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics63, 68–79.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ZeltC.A.1999. Modelling strategies and model assessment for wide‐angle seismic traveltime data. Geophysical Journal International139, 183–204.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZeltC.A., AzariaA. and LevanderA.2006. 3D seismic refraction traveltime tomography at a groundwater contamination site. Geophysics71, H67–H78.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ZeltC.A., SainK., NaumenkoJ.V. and SawyerD.S.2003. Assessment of crustal velocity models using seismic refraction and reflection tomography. Geophysical Journal International153, 609–626.
    [Google Scholar]
37. ZeltC.A. and SmithR.B.1992. Seismic traveltime inversion for 2‐D crustal velocity structure. Geophysical Journal International108, 16–34.
    [Google Scholar]
38. ZeltC.A. and ZeltB.C.1998. Study of out‐of‐plane effects in the inversion of refraction wide‐angle reflection traveltimes. Tectonophysics286, 209–221.
    [Google Scholar]