Treatment of conflicting dips in the 3D common‐reflection‐surface stack

References

1. BerglerS.2004. On The Determination and Use of Kinematic Wavefield Attributes for 3D Seismic Imaging . Logos Verlag, Berlin .
   [Google Scholar]
2. ČervenýV.2001. Seismic Ray Theory . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DümmongS.2006. Alternative implementierung des common reflection surface stapelverfahrens .  MsC thesis, University of Hamburg .
4. DuveneckE.2004. Tomographic Determination of Seismic Velocity Models with Kinematic Wavefield Attributes . Logos Verlag, Berlin .
   [Google Scholar]
5. GarabitoG., CruzJ.C. and HubralP.2007. Application of SA and VFSA global optimization algorithms for search of the 2‐D CRS stacking parameters. Wave Inversion Technology Consortium ‐ Annual Report No. 10, 24–31.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GelchinskyB.1989. Homeomorphic imaging in processing and interpretation of seismic data ‐ fundamentals and schemes. 59th SEG meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
7. GelchinskyJ., BerkovitchA. and KeydarS.1999. Multifocusing homeomorphic imaging. Part 1: Basic concepts and formulae. Journal of Applied Geophysics42, 229–242.
   [Google Scholar]
8. HubralP.1983. Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth. Geophysics48, 1051–1062.
   [Google Scholar]
9. JägerR.1999. The common–reflection–surface stack – theory and application .  MsC thesis, University of Karlsruhe .
10. JägerC.2005. Minimum‐Aperture Kirchhoff Migration with CRS Stack Attributes . Logos Verlag, Berlin .
    [Google Scholar]
11. LandaE., FomelS. and MoserT.J.2006. Path‐integral seismic imaging. Geophysical Prospecting54, 491–503.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LandaE., GurevichB., KeydarS. and TrachtmanP.1999. Application of multifocusing method for subsurface imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics42, 283–300.
    [Google Scholar]
13. MannJ.2001. Common‐Reflection‐Surface Stack and conflicting dips. In 71st SEG meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
14. MannJ.2002. Extensions and Applications of the Common‐Reflection‐Surface Stack Method . Logos Verlag, Berlin .
    [Google Scholar]
15. MüllerN.‐A.2003. The 3D common–reflection–surface stack – theory and application .  MsC thesis, University of Karlsruhe .
16. MüllerN.‐A.2007. Determination of interval velocities by inversion of kinematic 3D wavefield attributes . PhD thesis, Universität Karlsruhe , Germany .
17. NeidellN. and TanerM.1971. Semblance and other coherency measures for multichannel data. Geophysics36, 482–497.
    [Google Scholar]
18. PressW., TeukolskyS., VetterlingW. and FlanneryB.2002. Numerical Recipes in C++, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. SalvatierraM., YanoF., SantosL.T., MartinezJ.M.AndreaniR. and TygelM.2005. A global optimization algorithm applied to the CRS problem. Wave Inversion Technology Consortium ‐ Annual Report No. 8, 26–31.
20. SpinnerM.2007. CRS‐based minimum‐aperture Kirchhoff migration in the time domain . PhD thesis, Universität Karlsruhe , Germany .
21. ThoreM., De BazelaireE. and RayM.1994. Three–parameter equation: An efficient tool to enhance the stack. Geophysics59, 297–308.
    [Google Scholar]
22. WhitleyD., BeveridgeR. and RossC.1998. Automated velocity picking: a computer vision and optimization approach. Technical Report CS‐98‐114. Computer Science Department, Colorado State University .