1887
Volume 58, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Outcrop studies reveal a common occurrence of tabular zones of significantly‐increased fracture intensity affecting otherwise well‐lithified rocks. These zones, called fracture corridors, can have a profound effect on multi‐phase fluid flow in the subsurface. Using standard geo‐modelling tools, it is possible to generate 3D realizations of reservoirs that contain distributions of such fracture corridors that are consistent with observations, including the vertical frequency in pseudo‐wells inserted into the model at random locations. These models can generate the inputs to flow simulation. The approach adopted here is to run the flow simulations in a single‐porosity representation where the flow effects of fractures are upscaled into equivalent cell‐based properties, preserving a clear spatial relationship between the input geology and the resulting cellular model. The simulated reservoir performance outcomes are very similar to those seen in real oilfields: extreme variability between wells, early water breakthrough, disappointing recoveries and patchy saturation distributions. Thus, a model based on fracture corridors can provide an explanation for the observed flow performance of a suitable field. However, the use of seismics to identify fracture corridors is not an easy task. New work is needed to predict the seismic responses of fracture corridor systems to be able to judge whether it is likely that we can robustly detect and characterize these flow‐significant features adequately.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00810.x
2009-05-15
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ArbogastT., DouglasJ. and HornungU.1991. Modeling of naturally fractured reservoirs by formal homogenization techniques. In: Frontiers in Pure and Applied Mathematics (ed. R.Dautray ), pp. 1–19. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AzizK.1993. Reservoir simulation grids: opportunities and problems. 12th Symposium on Reservoir Simulation , New Orleans , USA , 28 February – 3 March, SPE 25233.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerkowitzB.2002. Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review. Advances in Water Resources25, 861–884.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BourbiauxB., BasquetR., DanielJ.M., HuL.Y., JenniS., LangeA. et al . 2005. Fractured reservoirs modelling: A review of the challenges and some recent solutions. First Break23, 33–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CacasM.C., DanielJ.M. and LetouzeyJ.2001. Nested geological modelling of naturally fractured reservoirs. Petroleum Geoscience7, 43–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChristieM.A.1996. Upscaling for reservoir simulation. Journal of Petroleum Technology48, 1004–1010.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CookeM.L. and PollardD.D.1997. Bedding plane slip in initial stages of fault‐related folding. Journal of Structural Geology19, 567–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CouplesG.D. and LewisH.1998. Lateral variations of strain in experimental forced folds. Tectonophysics295, 79–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CouplesG.D. and LewisH.2000. Effects of inter‐layer slip in model forced folds. In: Forced Folds and Fractures (eds J.W.Cosgrove and M.S.Ameen ), pp. 129–144. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CouplesG.D. and LewisH.2007. Introduction: the relationship between damage and localization. In: Relationships between Damage and Localisation (eds H.Lewis and G.D.Couples ), pp. 1–6. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CouplesG.D., LewisH. and TannerP.W.G.1998. Strain partitioning during flexural slip folding. In: Structural Geology in Reservoir Characterization (eds M.P.Coward , T.S.Daltaban and H.Johnson ), pp. 149–165. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. CouplesG., LewisH., MaJ., OldenP., QuijanoJ., FasaeT. et al . 2007. Geomechanics of faults: Impacts on seismic imaging. First Break25, 83–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. CouplesG.D., LewisH.ReynoldsM.A., PickupG.E., MaJ., RouainiaM. et al . 2003. Upscaling fluid flow and geomechanical properties in coupled matrix+fractures+fluids systems. Proceedings of Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston , Texas , February 2003, SPE 79696.
  14. DurlofskyL. J.2003. Upscaling of geocellular models for reservoir flow simulation: A review of recent progress. 7th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation , Buhl/Baden‐Baden Germany, 23–27 June.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FarmerC.L.2002. Upscaling: A review. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids40, 63–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FloresM., DaviesD., CouplesG. and PallsonB.2005. Stimulation of geothermal wells: Can we afford it? Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005 , Ankara , Turkey .
  17. GerritsenM.G. and DurlofskyL.J.2005. Modeling fluid flow in oil reservoirs. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics37, 211–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GilmanJ.K. and KazemiH.1983. Improvements in simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal23, 695.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HegglandR.2005. Using gas chimneys in seal integrity analysis: A discussion based on case histories. In: Evaluating Fault and Cap Rock Seals (eds P.Boult and J.Kaldi ), pp. 237–245. AAPG Hedberg Series.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KazemiH., MerrillL.S., PorterfieldK.L. and ZemanP.R.1976. Numerical simulation of water‐oil flow in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal16, 317–326. doi:10.2118/5719‐PA
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LiuE.J., QueenH., LiX.Y., ChapmanM., MaultzschS., LynnH.B. et al . 2003. Observation and analysis of frequency‐dependent anisotropy from a multicomponent VSP at Bluebell‐Altamont field, Utah. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 319–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MaJ. and CouplesG.D.2004. A finite element upscaling technique based on the heterogeneous multiscale method. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery , Cannes , France .
  23. MatthäiS.K., GeigerS., RobertsS.G., PaluznyA., BelaynehM., BurriA. et al . 2007. Numerical simulations of multiphase fluid flow in structurally complex reservoirs. In: Structurally Complex Reservoirs (eds S.J.Jolley , D.Barr , J.J.Walsh and R.J.Knipe ), pp. 405–429. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. NawabR., MaultzschS., YuhS., MoulyB., IdreesM., AmraouiF. et al . 2007. Fracture characterization using the multiazimuth VSP technique – A pilot case study. SEG Expanded Abstracts26, 3085. doi:10.1190/1.2793111
    [Google Scholar]
  25. NelsonR.A.2001. Geologic Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs . Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston .
    [Google Scholar]
  26. NeumanS. P.2005. Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeology Journal13, 124–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. PickupG.E., StephenK.D., MaJ., ZhangP. and ClarkJ.D.2005. Multi‐stage upscaling: Selection of suitable methods. Transport in Porous Media58, 191–216. doi:10.1007/s11242‐004‐5501‐5
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ReynoldsM.A., CouplesG.D., LewisH. and PickupG.E.2007. Localization processes in a coupled hydrogeomechanically‐sensitive fractured system. In: Relationships Between Damage and Localization (eds H.Lewis and G.D.Couples ), pp. 209–225. Geological Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ShackletonR., CookeM.L. and SussmanA.J.2005. Evidence for temporally changing mechanical stratigraphy and effects on joint network architecture. Geology33, 101–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WarrenJ.E. and RootP.J.1963. The behaviour of fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal3, 245–255.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00810.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00810.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error