1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 8, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The propagation velocity of a ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) wavelet may be used to derive physical subsurface properties, including layer thickness, porosity and water content. We describe a systematic error in semblance analysis of GPR common‐midpoint (CMP) data, arising from the response of the statistic to the waveform of the GPR pulse. Only the first‐breaks of GPR wavelets express true velocities and traveltimes but these cannot deliver a semblance response since they have zero amplitude; instead, this response derives from subsequent wavelet half‐cycles, delayed from the first‐break. This delay causes semblance picks to express slower velocity and later traveltime with respect to true quantities, even for simple cases of reflectivity. For a two‐layer synthetic CMP data set, in which the GPR source pulse via a 500 MHz Berlage wavelet, semblance picks underestimate interval velocities of 0.135 m/ns and 0.060 m/ns by 10.0% and 2.0%, respectively. Velocity biases are corrected using the coherence statistic to simulate first‐break traveltimes from a set of velocity picks, in a process termed ‘backshifting’. A linear regression of simulated first‐breaks yields smaller errors in the same interval velocities of −2.2% and −1.0%. A first real‐data example considers a reflection from the base of a 3.39 m thick air‐gap. Semblance analysis estimates the air‐wave velocity as 0.289 m/ns (−3.6% error) and the air‐gap thickness as 3.59 m (+6.1% error); backshifting yields equivalent estimates of 0.302 m/ns (+0.9% error) and 3.35 m (−1.2% error). In a second example, semblance‐ and backshifting‐derived velocity models overestimate the thickness of clay‐rich archaeological deposits by 19.0% and 3.1%, respectively. Backshifting is a simple modification to conventional practice and is recommended for any analysis where physical subsurface properties are to be derived from the output GPR velocity.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2010 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
2010-03-01
2024-04-27

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AldridgeD.F.1990. Short note: The Berlage wavelet. Geophysics55, 1508–1511
     [Google Scholar]
  2. (Errata1991. Geophysics56, 323).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AlkhalifahT.1996. Transformation to zero offset in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics61, 947–963.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AnnanA.P.2005. Ground‐penetrating radar. In: Near‐Surface Geophysics (ed. D.K.Butler ), pp. 357–438. SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ArconeS.A., PeapplesP.R. and LiuL.2003. Propagation of a ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) pulse in a thin‐surface waveguide. Geophysics68, 1922–1933.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BarnesC.L., TrottierJ.‐F. and ForgeronD.2008. Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using FPR by accounting for signal depth‐amplitude effects. NDT&E International41, 427–433. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.005
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BarrettB.E., MurrayT. and ClarkR.2007. Errors in radar CMP velocity estimates due to survey geometry, and their implication for ice water content estimation. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics12, 101–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BarrettB.E., MurrayT., ClarkR. and MatsuokaK.2008. Distribution and character of water in a surge‐type glacier, revealed by multi‐frequency and multi‐polarization ground‐penetrating radar. Journal of Geophysical Research113, F04011.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BechtA., AppelE. and DietrichP.2006. Analysis of multi‐offset GPR data: a case study in a coarse‐grained gravel aquifer. Near Surface Geophysics4, 227–240.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BerardB. and MaillolJ.‐C.2008. Common‐ and multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar study of a Roman villa, Tourega, Portugal. Archaeological Prospection15, 32–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. BoothA.D., ClarkR.A., HamiltonK. and MurrayT.2010. Multi‐offset ground penetrating radar methods to image buried foundations of a medieval Town Wall, Great Yarmouth, UK. Archaeological Prospection (in review).
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BoothA.D., ClarkR.A., MurrayT. and Hamilton, K.2008a. Multi‐offset GPR surveying for the suppression of coherent noise in urban environments.12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 16–19 June 2008, Birmingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. BoothA.D., EndresA.L. and MurrayT.2009. Spectral bandwidth enhancement of GPR profiling data using multiple‐frequency compositing. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 88–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. BoothA.D., LinfordN.T., ClarkR.A. and MurrayT.2008b. Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset GPR imaging of archaeological targets. Archaeological Prospection15, 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. BoxR. and LowreyP.2003. Reconciling sonic logs: Stretching synthetic seismograms. The Leading Edge22, 510–517.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. BradfordJ.H. and HarperJ.T.2005. Wave field migration as a tool for estimating spatially continuous radar velocity and water content in glaciers. Geophysical Research Letters32, L08502. doi:10.1029/2004GL021770
     [Google Scholar]
  17. BradfordJ.H., NicholsJ., MikesellT.D. and HarperJ.T.2009. Continuous profiles of electromagnetic wave velocity and water content in glaciers: An example from Bench Glacier, Alaska, USA. Annals of Glaciology50, 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. CastleR.J.1994. A theory of normal moveout. Geophysics59, 983–999.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. CREWES
    CREWES1999. Consortium for research in elastic wave exploration seismology. PhD thesis, University of Calgary.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. DeregowskiS.M.1986. What is DMO?First Break4(7), 7–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. DevlinS., BoothA.D., ClarkR. and HousemanG.2008. Velocity and depth determination from common‐offset, near‐surface ground penetrating radar data for utility surveying.12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 16–19 June 2008, Birmingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. DuvalP.1977. The role of water content on the creep rate of polycrystal‐line ice. Symposium on Isotopes and Impurities in Snow and Ice, Grenoble, France 1975, pp. 29–33. International Association of Hydrology Scientific Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. EndresA.L., MurrayT., BoothA.D. and WestL.J.2009. A new framework for estimating englacial water content and pore geometry using combined radar and seismic wave velocities. Geophysical Research Letters36, L04501.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. GreavesR.J., LesmesD.P., LeeJ.M. and ToksözM.N.1996. Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi‐offset, ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysics61, 683–695.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. GusmeroliA., MurrayT., BarrettB., ClarkR. and BoothA.2008. Estimates of water content in glacier ice using vertical radar profiles: A modified interpretation from Falljökull, Iceland. Journal of Glaciology54, 939–942.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. HamiltonK.2006. Great Yarmouth Extensive Urban Survey.Norfolk Landscape Archaeology Report.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. HornbyB.E., HowieJ.M. and InceD.W.2003. Anisotropy correction for deviated‐well sonic logs: Application to seismic well‐tie. Geophysics68, 464–471.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. HuismanJ.A., HubbardS.S., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: A review. Vadose Zone Journal2, 476–491.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. IrvingJ.D. and KnightR.J.2003. Removal of wavelet dispersion from ground‐penetrating radar data. Geophysics68, 960–970.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. KindT. and MaierhoferC.2006. Railway ballast fouling inspection by monitoring the GPR propagation velocity with a multi‐offset antenna array.11th International Conference on GPR, 19–22 June, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KjartanssonE.1979. Constant Q wave propagation and attenuation. Journal of Geophysical Research68, 960–970.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. LeucciG.2002. Ground‐penetrating radar survey to map the location of buried structures under two churches. Archaeological Prospection9, 217–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. LeucciG., NegriS. and CarrozzoM.T.2003. Ground penetrating radar (GPR): an application for evaluation the state of maintenance of the building coating. Annals of Geophysics46, 481–489.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LevinF.K.1971. Apparent velocity from dipping interface reflections. Geophysics36, 510–516.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LinfordN.T and LinfordP.K.2004. Short report: Ground penetrating radar survey over a Roman building at Groundwell Ridge, Blunsdon St Andrew, Swindon, UK. Archaeological Prospection11, 49–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LooyengaM.1965. Dielectric Constants of Heterogeneous Mixture. Physica31, 401–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MacheretY.Y. and GlazovskyA.F.2000. Estimation of absolute water content in Spitsbergen glaciers from radar sounding data. Polar Research19, 205–216
     [Google Scholar]
  39. MacheretY.Y., MoskalevskyM.Y. and VasilenkoE.V.1993. Velocity of radio waves in glaciers as an indicator of their hydrothermal state, structure and regime. Journal of Glaciology39, 373–384.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. MayneW.H.1962. Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics6, 927–938.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. MoyseyS. and KnightR.2004. Modeling the field‐scale relationship between dielectric constant and water content in heterogeneous systems. Water Resources Research40, W03510.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. MurrayT., BoothA.D. and RippinD.2007. Water‐content of glacier‐ice: Limitations on estimates from velocity analysis of surface ground‐penetrating radar surveys. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics12, 87–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. MurrayT., StuartG.W., FryM., GambleN.H. and CrabtreeM.D.2000. Englacial water distribution in a temperate glacier from surface and borehole radar velocity analysis. Journal of Glaciology46, 389–398.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. NealA.2004. Ground‐penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: Principles, problems and progress. Earth Science Reviews66, 261–330.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. NeidellN.S. and TanerM.T.1971. Semblance and other coherency measures for multichannel data. Geophysics36, 482–497.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Norfolk County Laboratory
    Norfolk County Laboratory . 2005. Job S06326: Borehole Records for the Great Yarmouth Archaeological Map, WS44‐WS48.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. NovoA., GrasmueckM., ViggianoD. and LorenzoH.2008. 3D GPR in Archaeology: What can be gained from dense data acquisition and processing?12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 16–19 June, Birmingham, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. ParenJ.G.1970. Dielectric properties of ice. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. PorsaniJ.L. and SauckW.A.2007. Ground‐penetrating radar profiles over multiple steel tanks: Artefact removal through effective data processing. Geophysics72, J77–J83. doi:10.1190/1.2783412
     [Google Scholar]
  50. RadzeviciusS., ChenC.‐C., PetersJr.L. and DanielsJ.J.2003. Near‐field radiation dynamics through FDTD modeling. Journal of Applied Geophysics52, 75–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. ReineC., van der BaanM. and ClarkR.2009. The robustness of seismic attenuation measurements using fixed‐ and variable‐window time‐frequency transforms. Geophysics74, WA123–WA135. doi:10.1190/1.3043726
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ReynoldsJ.M.2000. An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics,2nd edn. Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. SavaP.C., BiondiB. and EtgenJ.2005. Wave‐equation migration velocity analysis by focusing diffractions and reflections. Geophysics70, U19–U27. doi:10.1190/1.1925749
     [Google Scholar]
  54. SchneiderW.A.1971. Developments in seismic data processing and analysis (1968‐1970). Geophysics36, 1043–1073.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. SheriffR.E. and GeldartL.P.1999. Exploration Seismology,2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. SinisaloA., GrinstedA., MooreJ.C., KärkäsE. and. PetterssonR.2003. Snow‐accumulation studies in Antarctica with ground‐penetrating radar using 50 100 and 800 MHz antenna frequencies. Annals of Glaciology37, 194–198
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Soil Survey of England and Wales
    Soil Survey of England and Wales . 1973. Soils of Norfolk, 1:100,000.HMSO, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. StrobbiaC. and CassianiG.2007. Multilayer ground‐penetrating radar guided waves in shallow soil layers for estimating soil water content. Geophysics72, J17–J30.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. TanerM.T. and KoehlerF.1969. Velocity spectra – digital computer derivation and applications of velocity functions. Geophysics34, 859–881.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. ToppG.C., DavisJ.L. and AnnanA.P.1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research16, 574–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. TronickeJ., DietrichP., WahligU. and AppelE.2002. Integrating surface georadar and crosshole radar tomography: A validation experiment in braided stream deposits. Geophysics67, 1516–523.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. TuressonA.2006. Water content and porosity estimates from ground‐penetrating radar and resistivity. Journal of Applied Geophysics58, 99–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. TurnerG.1994. Subsurface radar propagation deconvolution. Geophysics9, 215–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. TurnerG. and SigginsA.F.1994. Constant Q attenuation of subsurface radar pulses. Geophysics59, 1192–1200.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Van der KrukJ., VereeckenH. and JacobR.W.2009. Identifying dispersive GPR signals and inverting for surface wave‐guide properties. The Leading Edge28, 1234–1239.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Van OvermeerenR.A., SariowanS.V. and GehrelsJ.C.1997. Ground penetrating radar for determining volumetric soil water content; Results of comparative measurements at two test sites. Journal of Hydrology197, 316–338.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. WeihermüllerL., HuismanJ.A., LambotS., HerbstM. and VereeckenH.2007. Mapping the spatial variation of soil water content at the field scale with different ground penetrating radar techniques. Journal of Hydrology340, 205–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. YanJ. and TsvankinI.2008. AVO‐sensitive semblance analysis for wide‐azimuth data. Geophysics73, P.U1–U11.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion and Interpretation of Seismic Data.SEG.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. ZengX., McMechanG.A., BhattachayraJ.P., AikenC.LV., XuX., HammonIIIW.S. and CorbeanuR.M.2004. 3D imaging of a reservoir analogue in point bar deposits in the Ferron sandstone, Utah, using ground‐penetrating radar. Geophysical Prospecting52, 151–163.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. ZhouH., SatoM. and LiuH.2005. Migration velocity analysis and prestack migration of common‐transmitter GPR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing43, 86–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. ZiolkowskiA.1984. Deconvolution.International Human Resources Development Corp., Boston.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
Loading
Semblance response to a ground‐penetrating radar wavelet and resulting errors in velocity analysis
Near Surface Geophysics 8, 235 (2010); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2010008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error