1887

Abstract

Of particular concern in the monitoring of gas injection for the purposes of storage, disposal or IOR is the exact spatial distribution of the gas volumes in the subsurface. In principle this requirement is addressed by the use of 4D seismic data, although it is recognised that the seismic response still largely provides a qualitative estimate of moved subsurface fluids. Exact quantitative evaluation of fluid distributions and associated saturations remains a challenge to be solved. Here, an attempt has been made to produce mapped quantitative estimates of gas volume injected into a clastic reservoir. Despite the accuracy of the calibration using three repeated seismic surveys, time-delay and amplitude attributes reveal fine-scale differences though large-scale agreement in the estimated fluid movement. These differences indicate disparities in the nature of the two attributes themselves and highlight the need for a more careful consideration of amplitude processing for quantitative 4D seismic interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201400987
2010-06-14
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201400987
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error