1887

Abstract

In this study porosity (Φ) and hydraulic conductivity (K) estimations are conducted on the basis of independent frequencies of 1D, 2D and lab Spectral Induced Polarisation (SIP) data. We compare SIP 1D and 2D models with lab results, before we discuss different approaches to derive hydraulic parameters i.e. classical and modified Archie for Φ estimation and Slater and Lesmes (2002) and Boerner et al. (1996) for K estimation. Both approaches for P estimation yield similar results, while lab and field data show differences. For K estimation lab and field SIP data agree better. While K values after Boerner vary strongly within depth, results after Slater vary in a smaller range but are slightly too low, probably due to the limited validity range of this empirical relation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20144782
2010-09-06
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20144782
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error