1887
Volume 58 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic data acquired along rugged topographic surfaces present well‐known problems in seismic imaging. In conventional seismic data processing, datum statics are approximated by the surface consistence assumption, which states that all seismic rays travel vertically in the top layer. Hence, the datum static for each single trace is constant. In case this assumption does not apply, non‐constant statics are required. The common reflection surface (CRS) stack for rugged surface topography provides the capability to deal with this non‐vertical static issue. It handles the surface elevation as a coordinate component and treats the elevation variation in the sense of directional datuming. In this paper I apply the CRS stack method to a synthetic data set that simulates the acquisition along an irregular surface topography. After the CRS stack, by means of the wavefield attributes, a simple algorithm for redatuming the CRS stack section to an arbitrarily chosen planar surface is performed. The redatumed section simulates a stack section whose acquisition surface is the chosen planar surface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00853.x
2009-12-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeasleyC. and LynnW.1991. The zero‐velocity layer: Migration from irregular surfaces. 8th ASEG Geophysical Conference, Expanded Abstracts, 35–40.
  2. BeasleyC. and LynnW.1992. The zero‐velocity layer: migration from irregular surfaces. Geophysics57, 1435–1443.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerryhillC.1979. Wave equation datuming. Geophysics44, 1329–1344.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BerryhillJ.R.1984. Wave equation datuming before stack (short note). Geophysics49, 2064–2067.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BevcD.1997. Flooding the topography: Wave‐equation datuming of land data with rugged acquisition topography. 67th SEG meeting, Dallas , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1278–1281.
  6. ČervenýV.2001. Seismic Ray Theory . Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GazdagJ.1984. Migration of seismic data by phase shift plus interpolation. Geophysics49, 124–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GurevichB., KeydarS. and LandaE.2002. Multifocusing image over an irregular topography. Geophysics67, 639–643.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HeilmannZ., MannJ. and KoglinI.2006. CRS‐stack‐based seismic imaging considering top‐surface topography. Geophysical Prospecting54, 681–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HoechtG.2002. Traveltime approximations for 2D and 3D media and kinematic wavefield attributes . PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Germany .
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HubralP.1983. Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth. Geophysics48, 1051–1062.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HubralP. and KreyT.1980. Interval Velocities from Seismic Reflection Traveltime Measurements . SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MannJ., JaegerR., MuellerT., HoechtG. and HubralP.1999. Common‐reflection‐surface stack – A real data example. Journal of Applied Geophysics42, 301–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MilliganP.A.1998. Anisotropic statics for a 2‐D line over a mountainous overthrust belt in Bolivia. 68th SEG meeting, New Orleans , Louisiana , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1413–1416.
  15. TanerM.T. and KoehlerF.1969. Velocity spectra – Digital computer derivations and applications of velocity functions. Geophysics34, 859–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhangY.2003. Common‐reflection‐surface stack and the handling of top surface topography . PhD thesis, Logos Verlag , Berlin .
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhangY. and HubralP.2002. 2D ZO CRS stack and redatuming for a complex top surface topography. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2051–2053.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00853.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00853.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition; Data processing; Imaging; Velocity analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error