1887
Volume 58 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Migration maps seismic data to reflectors in the Earth. Reflections are not only caused by small‐scale variations of the velocity and density but also of the quality factor that describes attenuation. We investigated scattering due to velocity and attenuation perturbations by computing the resolution function or point‐spread function in a homogeneous background model. The resolution function is the migration image of seismic reflection data generated by a point scatterer. We found that the resolution function mixes velocity and attenuation parameter perturbations to the extent that they cannot be reconstructed independently. This is true for a typical seismic setting with sources and receivers at the surface and a buried scatterer. As a result, it will be impossible to simultaneously invert for velocity and attenuation perturbations in the scattering approach, also known as the Born approximation.

We proceeded to investigate other acquisition geometries that may resolve the ambiguity between velocity and attenuation perturbations. With sources and receivers on a circle around the scatterer, in 2D, the ambiguity disappears. It still shows up in a cross‐well setting, although the mixing of velocity and attenuation parameters is less severe than in the surface‐to‐surface case. We also consider illumination of the target by diving waves in a background model that has velocity increasing linearly with depth. The improvement in illumination is, however, still insufficient to remove the ambiguity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00866.x
2010-02-10
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, Volume I . W.H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0716710587.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarnesC., ChararaM. and TsuchiyaT.2008. Feasibility study for an anisotropic full waveform inversion of cross‐well seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting56, 897–906.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BerkhoutA.J., OngkiehongL., VolkerA.W.F. and BlacquièreG.2001. Comprehensive assessment of seismic acquisition geometries by focal beams – Part I: Theoretical considerations. Geophysics66, 911–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeylkinG. and BurridgeR.1990. Linearized inverse scattering problems in acoustics and elasticity. Wave Motion12, 15–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BleisteinN., CohenJ.K. and StockwellJ.W.2000. Mathematics of Multidimensional Seismic Imaging, Migration, and Inversion . Springer–Verlag. ISBN 0387950613.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CausseE., MittetR. and UrsinB.1999. Preconditioning of full‐waveform inversion in viscoacoustic media. Geophysics64, 130–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ChaventG. and PlessixR.E.1999. An optimal true‐amplitude least‐squares prestack depth‐migration operator. Geophysics64, 508–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChenJ. and SchusterG.T.1999. Resolution limits of migrated images. Geophysics64, 1046–1053.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CraseE., PicaA., NobleM., McDonaldJ. and TarantolaA.1990. Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion: Application to real data. Geophysics55, 527–538.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CraseE., WidemanC., NobleM. and TarantolaA.1992. Nonlinear elastic waveform inversion of land seismic reflection data. Journal of Geophysical Research97, 4685–4703.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DevaneyA.J.1984. Geophysical diffraction tomography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingGE‐22, 3–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DochertyP.1991. A brief comparison of some Kirchhoff integral formulas for migration and inversion. Geophysics56, 1164–1169.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GélisC., VirieuxJ. and GrandjeanG.2007. Two‐dimensional elastic full waveform inversion using Born and Rytov formulations in the frequency domain. Geophysical Journal International168, 605–633.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GjøystdalH., IversenE., LaurainR., LecomteI., VinjeV. and ÅstebølK.2002. Review of ray theory applications in modelling and imaging of seismic data. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica46, 113–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GrayS.1997. True‐amplitude migration: a comparison of three approaches. Geophysics62, 929–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GuittonA.2004. Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators. Geophysics69, 1017–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HakB. and MulderW.A.2008a. Preconditioning for linearised inversion of attenuation and velocity perturbations. 70th EAGE meeting, Rome , Italy , Extended Abstracts, H002.
  18. HakB. and MulderW.A.2008b. Preconditioning for linearized inversion of attenuation and velocity perturbations. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas , Nevada , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2036–2040.
  19. HicksG.J. and PrattR.G.2001. Reflection waveform inversion using local descent methods: Estimating attenuation and velocity over a gas‐sand deposit. Geophysics66, 598–612.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. InnanenK.A. and WegleinA.B.2007. On the construction of an absorptive‐dispersive medium model via direct linear inversion of reflected seismic primaries. Inverse Problems23, 2289–2310.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JinS., MadariagaR., VirieuxJ. and LambarG.1992. Two‐dimensional asymptotic iterative elastic inversion. Geophysical Journal International108, 575–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KennettB.L.N. and SambridgeM.1998. Inversion for multiple parameter classes. Geophysical Journal International135, 304–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KennettB.L.N., SambridgeM.S. and WilliamsonP.R.1988. Subspace methods for large inverse problems with multiple parameter classes. Geophysical Journal International94, 237–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KuvshinovB.N. and MulderW.A.2006. The exact solution of the time‐harmonic wave equation for a linear velocity profile. Geophysical Journal International167, 659–662.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LaillyP.1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migration. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Inverse Scattering: Theory and Applications (eds J.B.Bednar , R.Redner , E.Robinson and A.Weglein ), pp. 206–220. SIAM , Philadelphia . ISBN 0898711908.
  26. LambaréG., VirieuxJ., MadariagaR. and JinS.1992. Iterative asymptotic inversion in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics57, 1138–1154.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MoraP.1987. Nonlinear two‐dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data. Geophysics52, 1211–1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MoraP.1988. Elastic wave‐field inversion of reflection and transmission data. Geophysics53, 750–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MoraP.1989. Inversion = migration + tomography. Geophysics54, 1575–1586.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MulderW.A. and HakB.2009. An ambiguity in attenuation scattering imaging. Geophysical Journal International178, 1614–1624.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MulderW.A. and PlessixR.E.2004. A comparison between one‐way and two‐way wave‐equation migration. Geophysics69, 1491–1504.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MulderW.A. and PlessixR.E.2008. Exploring some issues in acoustic full waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting56, 827–841.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. NemethT., WuC. and SchusterG.T.1999. Least‐squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics64, 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. OpertoS., RavautC., ImprotaL., VirieuxJ., HerreroA. and Dell'AversanaP.2004. Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide‐aperture seismic data by multi‐scale traveltime and waveform inversions: a case study. Geophysical Prospecting52, 625–651.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ØstmoS., MulderW.A. and PlessixR.E.2002. Finite‐difference iterative migration by linearized waveform inversion in the frequency domain. 72nd SEG meeting, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1384–1387.
  36. PlessixR.E. and MulderW.A.2004. Frequency‐domain finite‐difference amplitude‐preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International157, 975–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. PrattR.G.1999. Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics64, 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. PrattR.G., ShinC.S. and HicksG.J.1998. Gauss‐Newton and full Newton methods in frequency‐space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International133, 341–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. RaoY. and WangY.H.2008. The strategies for attenuation inversion with waveform tomography. 70th EAGE meeting, Rome , Italy , Extended Abstracts, H006.
  40. RibodettiA., OpertoS., VirieuxJ., LambaréG., ValéroH. and GibertD.2000. Asymptotic viscoacoustic diffraction tomography of ultrasonic laboratory data: a tool for rock properties analysis. Geophysical Journal International140, 324–340.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. RibodettiA. and VirieuxJ.1998. Asymptotic theory for imaging the attenuation factor Q. Geophysics63, 1767–1778.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. RibodettiA., VirieuxJ. and DurandS.1995. Asymptotic theory for viscoacoustic seismic imaging. 65th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 631–634.
  43. RickettJ.E.2003. Illumination‐based normalization for wave‐equation depth migration. Geophysics68, 1371–1379.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. RoyleG.T. and SinghS.C.2008. Viscoelastic modeling and full waveform inversion in attenuating media. 70th EAGE meeting, Rome , Italy , Workshop WO11, 121–125.
  45. ShinC., JangS. and MinD.J.2001. Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth migration by inverse scattering theory. Geophysical Prospecting49, 592–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. ShippR.M. and SinghS.C.2002. Two‐dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide‐aperture marine seismic streamer data. Geophysical Journal International151, 325–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. SymesW.W.2008. Approximate linearized inversion by optimal scaling of prestack depth migration. Geophysics73, R23–R35.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. TarantolaA.1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. TarantolaA.1986. A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysics51, 1893–1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ten KroodeA.P.E., SmitD.J. and VerdelA.R.1998. A microlocal analysis of migration. Wave Motion28, 149–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. ToxopeusG., PetersenS., ThorbeckeJ. and WapenaarK.2004. Simulating high resolution inversion: decomposing the resolution function. 74th SEG meeting, Denver , Colorado , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1798–1801.
  52. ToxopeusG., ThorbeckeJ., WapenaarK., PetersenS., SlobE. and FokkemaJ.2008. Simulating migrated and inverted seismic data by filtering a geologic model. Geophysics73, T1–T10.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Van HoutenE.E.W., PaulsenK.D., MigaM.I., KennedyF.E. and WeaverJ.B.1999. An overlapping subzone technique for MR‐based elastic property reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine42, 779–786.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. VasheghaniF. and LinesL.R.2009. Viscosity and Q in heavy‐oil reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge28, 856–860.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Von SeggernD.1991. Spatial resolution of acoustic imaging with the Born approximation. Geophysics56, 1185–1202.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. WapenaarC.P.A.1997. 3‐D migration of cross‐spread data: resolution and amplitude aspects. Geophysics62, 1220–1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. WuR.S. and ToksözM.N.1987. Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging. Geophysics52, 11–25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00866.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00866.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acquisition; Attenuation; Migration

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error