1887
Volume 59 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Compaction induced by pore‐pressure decrease inside a reservoir can be monitored by measuring traveltime shifts of reflection events on time‐lapse seismic data. Recently we introduced a perturbation‐based formalism to describe traveltime shifts caused by the 3D stress‐induced velocity field around a compacting reservoir. Application of this method to homogeneous background models showed that the offset variation of traveltime shifts is controlled primarily by the anisotropic velocity perturbations and can provide valuable information about the shear and deviatoric stresses.

Here, we model and analyse traveltime shifts for compacting reservoirs whose elastic properties are different from those of the surrounding medium. For such models, the excess stress is influenced primarily by the contrast in the rigidity modulus μ across the reservoir boundaries. Synthetic examples demonstrate that a significant (25% or more) contrast in μ enhances the isotropic velocity perturbations outside the reservoir. Nevertheless, the influence of background heterogeneity is mostly confined to the reservoir and its immediate vicinity and the anisotropic velocity changes are still largely responsible for the offset dependence of traveltime shifts. If the reservoir is stiffer than the host rock, the background heterogeneity reduces anisotropic velocity perturbations inside the reservoir but increases them in the overburden. As a result, in this case, the magnitude of the offset variation of traveltime shifts is generally higher for reflections from interfaces above the reservoir.

We also study compaction‐induced stress/strain and traveltime shifts for a stiff reservoir embedded in a softer layered model based on velocity profiles from the Valhall Field in the North Sea. Despite producing discontinuities in strain across medium interfaces, horizontal layering does not substantially alter the overall behaviour of traveltime shifts. The most pronounced offset variation of traveltime shifts is observed for overburden events recorded at common midpoints close to the reservoir edges. On the whole, prestack analysis of traveltime shifts should help better constrain compaction‐induced velocity perturbations in the presence of realistic background heterogeneity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00909.x
2010-12-13
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ČervenýV.2001. Seismic Ray Theory . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521018226.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChinL.Y. and NagelN.B.2004. Modeling of subsidence and reservoir compaction under waterflood operations. International Journal of Geomechanics4, 28–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DownesJ.R., FauxD.A. and O’ReillyE.P.1997. A simple method for calculating strain distributions in quantum dot structures. Journal of Applied Physics81, 6700–6702.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FauxD.A., DownesJ.R. and O’ReillyE.P.1997. Analytic solutions for strains distributions in quantum‐wire structures. Journal of Applied Physics82, 3754–3762.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FuckR.F., BakulinA. and TsvankinI.2009. Theory of traveltime shifts around compacting reservoirs: 3D solutions for heterogeneous anisotropic media. Geophysics74, D25–D36.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FuckR.F. and TsvankinI.2009. Analysis of the symmetry of a stressed medium using nonlinear elasticity. Geophysics74, WB79–WB87.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GeertsmaJ.1973. Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Technology25, 734–744.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GuilbotJ. and SmithB.2002. 4D constrained depth conversion for reservoir compaction estimation: Application to Ekofisk field. The Leading Edge21, 302–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GutierrezM.S. and LewisR.W.2002. Coupling of fluid flow and deformation in underground formations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics128, 779–787.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HatchellP. and BourneS.2005a. Measuring reservoir compaction using time‐lapse time shifts. 75th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 2500–2503.
  11. HatchellP. and BourneS.2005b. Rocks under strain: strain‐induced time‐lapse time‐shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs. The Leading Edge24, 1222–1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HerwangerJ. and HorneS.2005. Predicting time‐lapse stress effects in seismic data. The Leading Edge24, 1234–1242.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HerwangerJ. and HorneS.2009. Linking reservoir geomechanics and time‐lapse seismics: Predicting anisotropic velocity changes and seismic attributes. Geophysics74, W13–W33.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HodgsonN., MacBethC., DurantiL., RickettJ. and NiheiK.2007. Inverting for reservoir pressure change using time‐lapse time strain: application to Genesis field, Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge26, 649–652.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HuS.M.1989. Stress from a parallelepipedic thermal inclusion in a semispace. Journal of Applied Physics66, 2741–2743.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LandrøM. and OsdalB.2009. Estimation of water column velocity and thickness changes from 4D seabed diffraction analysis. 71st EAGE meeting, Amsterdam , the Netherlands , Expanded Abstracts, V023.
  17. LandrøM. and StammeijerJ.2004. Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes. Geophysics69, 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PressW.H., TeukolskyS.A., VellerlingW.T. and FlanneryB.P.1992. Numerical Recipes in C – The Art of Scientific Computing , 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 818561816X.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. PrioulR., BakulinA. and BakulinV.2004. Nonlinear rock physics model for estimation of 3D subsurface stress in anisotropic formations: theory and laboratory verification. Geophysics69, 415–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RøsteT., StovasA. and LandrøM.2006. Estimation of layer thickness and velocity changes using 4D prestack seismic data. Geophysics71, S219–S234.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SarkarD., BakulinA. and KranzR.L.2003. Anisotropic inversion of seismic data for stressed media: theory and a physical modeling study on Berea sandstone. Geophysics68, 690–704.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SegallP.1992. Induced stresses due to fluid extraction from axisymmetric reservoirs. Pure and Applied Geophysics139, 535–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SegallP., GrassoJ.R. and MossopA.1994. Poroelastic stressing and induced seismicity near the Lacq gas field, southwestern France. Journal of Geophysical Research99, 15,423–15,438.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SinhaB.K. and PlonaT.J.2001. Wave propagation in rocks with elastic‐plastic deformations. Geophysics66, 772–785.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SoltanzadehH., HawkesC.D. and SharmaJ.S.2007. Poroelastic model for production‐ and injection‐induced stresses in reservoirs with elastic properties different from the surrounding rock. International Journal of Geomechanics7, 353–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SylteJ.E., ThomasL.K., RhettD.W., BruningD.D. and NagelN.B.1999. Water induced compaction in the Ekofisk field. SPE meeting, Houston , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 56426.
  27. WangH.F.2000. Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology . Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691037469.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. YaleD.P. and JamiesonW.H.1994. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of carbonates. In: Rock Mechanics Models and Measurements Challenges from Industry. Proceedings of the 1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium (eds P.P.Nelson and S.E.Laubach ), pp. 463–471. Balkema. ISBN 9054103858.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00909.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00909.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error