1887
Volume 9 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Mapping bedrock structure beneath overburden is crucial for understanding geological and hydrogeological processes. Acquiring this information is generally done using well drilling or geophysical surveys; but these studies are expensive and require large periods of acquisition and processing time. In addition, geophysical data acquisition can be logistically challenging in urban zones with limited available areas for instrumentation deployment.

Under favourable conditions (1D structure and high acoustic impedance contrast) the H/V microtremor technique can provide estimates of bedrock depth. This technique is used to obtain the soil resonance frequency in seismic microzonation studies. It is based on the computation of the horizontal to vertical spectral ratio of microtremor recordings acquired at a single station. The soil resonance frequency is related to soil shear‐wave velocity and thickness.

Here we investigate the capability of combining microtremor and traditional exploration geophysical techniques (electrical resistivity and seismic tomography) to obtain an empirical relationship relating soil resonance frequency and overburden thickness. Subsequently we propose to extend microtremor measurements to adjacent areas that have not been covered by geophysical surveys.

This methodology has been applied at a test site located in a granitic environment where alluvial/colluvial sediments cover the granite weathering profile. This area is characterized by urban development and sectors having rugged topography. this area has suitable conditions to apply the H/V microtremor technique. Overburden thickness has been estimated to range between 20–50 m. The proposed methodology has been validated at the test site, encouraging us to apply the H/V method as an exploration tool in similar geological environments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011021
2018-12-18
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BachrachR. and NurA.1998. High‐resolution shallow‐seismic experiments in sand. Part I: Watertable, fluid flow and saturation. Geophysics63, 1225–1233.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BardP.‐Y.1985. Les effets de site d’origine structurale: Principaux résultats experimentaux et théoriques. In: Genie Parasismique (ed. V.Davidovici ), pp. 223–238. Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BardP.Y.1999. Microtremor measurements: A tool for site effect estimation? In: The Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion – Recent Progress and New Horizon on ESG Study, Volume 3 (eds K.Irikura , K.Kudo , H.Okada and T.Sasatani ), pp. 1251–1279. Balkema.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BardP.‐Y. and BouchonM.1985. The two‐dimensional resonance of sediment‐filled valleys. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America75, 519–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BardP.Y. and SESAME‐Team. 2004. Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations‐measurements, processing and interpretations. SESAME European research project EVG1‐CT‐2000‐00026, deliverable D23.12, available at http://sesame‐fp5.obs.ujf‐grenoble.fr
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnefoy‐ClaudetS.2004. Nature du bruit de fond sismique: Implications pour les études des effects de site.PhD thesis, Joseph Fourier University (in French).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CornouC., GuillierB., KristekJ., Bonnefoy‐ClaudetS.BardP‐Y., FaehD. and MoczoP.2006. Simulation of seismic ambient vibrations: Does the H/V provide quantitative information in 2D–3D structure. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology, 30 August – 1 September, Expanded Abstracts, 153.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CornouC., KristekJ., OhrnbergerM., Di GiulioG., SchisseleE., GuillierB., Bonnefoy‐ClaudetS., WatheletM., FähD., BardP‐Y. and MoczoP.2004. Simulation of seismic ambient vibrations: II. H/V and array techniques for real sites.Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Expanded Abstracts, 1130.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DelgadoJ., López CasadoC., EstévezA., GinerJ., CuencaA. and MolinaS.2000a. Mapping soft soils in the Segura river valley (SE Spain): A case study of microtremors as an exploration tool. Journal of Applied Geophysics45, 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DelgadoJ., López CasadoC., GinerJ., EstévezA., CuencaA. and MolinaS.2000b. Microtremors as a geophysical exploration tool: Applications and limitations. Pure and Applied Geophysics157, 1445–1462.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DobryR., OweisI. and UrzuaA.1976. Simplified procedures for estimating the fundamental period of a soil profile. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America66, 1293–1321.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FähD., KindF. and GiardiniD.2001. A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophysical Journal International145, 535–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FoxR., HohmannG., KillpackT. and RjioL.1980. Topographic effects in resistivity and induced polarization surveys. Geophysics45, 75–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GiaoP.H., WellerA., HienD.H. and AdisornsupawatK.2008. An approach to construct the weathering profile in a hilly granitic terrain based on electrical imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics65, 30–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GrelleG. and GuadagnoF.M.2009. Seismic refraction methodology for groundwater level determination: ‘Water seismic index’. Journal of Applied Geophysics68, 301–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GuéguenP., CornouC., GaramboisS. and BantonJ.2007. On the limitation of the H/V spectral ratio using seismic noise as an exploration tool. Application to the Grenoble basin (France), a small apex ratio basin. Pure and Applied Geophysics164, 115–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ibs‐von SehtM. and WohlenbergJ.1999. Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America89, 250–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KonoK. and OhmachiT.1998. Ground motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America88, 228–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LachetC. and BardP.Y.1994. Numerical and theorical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of Nakamura’s technique. Journal of Physics of the Earth42, 377–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LecomteI., GjoystdalH., DahleA. and PedersenO.C.2000. Improving modelling and inversion in refraction seismic with a first‐order Eikonal solver. Geophysical Prospecting48, 437–454.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LeeW. and StewartS.1981. Principles and Applications of Microearthquake Networks. Academic Press. LokeM.H.2004. Tutorial on 2D and 3D electrical imaging surveys. Short course lecture note on “Electrical Imaging of Subsurface and Its Application in Geosystem Engineering”. 1–4 November 2004, Asian Institut of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosection by quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LongR., CawleyP. and LoweM.2003. Acoustic wave propagation in buried iron water pipes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A459, 2749–2770.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. MacauA.2008. Aplicación de métodos experimentales y de simulación numérica para la microzonificación sísmica en zonas rurales y urbanas. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. NakamuraY.1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of the Railway Technical Research Institute30, 25–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. NogoshiM. and IgarashiT.1971. On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor, part 2. Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan24, 26–40 (in Japanese with English abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ParolaiS., BormannP. and MilkereitC.2002. New relationships between Vs, thickness of sediments and resonance frequency calculated by the H/V ratio of seismic noise for the Cologne area (Germany). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 2521–2527.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SchusterG.T. and Quintus‐BoszA.1993. Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: Theory. Geophysics58, 1314–1323.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SilvesterP.P. and FerrariR.L.1990. Finite Elements for Electrical Engineers,2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. SteimenS., FähD., KindF., SchmidC. and GiardiniD.2003. Identifying 2‐D resonance in microtremor wave fields. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 583–599.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011021
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011021
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error