Reconstruction of geologic bodies in depth associated with a sedimentary basin using gravity and magnetic data

References

1. BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.1994. Generalized compact gravity inversion. Geophysics59, 57–68.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2006. Interactive 2D magnetic inversion: A tool for aiding forward modeling and testing geologic hypotheses. Geophysics71, L43–L50.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C. and MedeirosW.E.1997. Gravity inversion of basement relief using approximate equality constraints on depths. Geophysics62, 1745–1757.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C. and MedeirosW.E.1999a. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics64, 48–60.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C. and MedeirosW.E.1999b. Stable inversion of gravity anomalies of sedimentary basins with nonsmooth basement reliefs and arbitrary density contrast variations. Geophysics64, 754–764.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BearG.W., HaydarJ. and RudmanA.J.1995. Linear inversion of gravity data for 3‐D density distributions. Geophysics60, 1354–1364.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BeltrãoJ.F., SilvaJ.B.C. and CostaJ.C.1991. Robust polynomial fitting method for regional gravity estimation. Geophysics56, 80–89.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bertete‐AguirreH., CherkaevE. and OristaglioM.2002. Non‐smooth gravity problem with total variation penalization functional. Geophysical Journal International149, 499–507.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BursteddeC. and GhattasO.2009. Algorithmic strategies for full waveform inversion: 1D experiments. Geophysics74, WCC37–WCC46.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Caratori TontiniF., CocchiL. and CarmiscianoC.2008. Potential‐field inversion for a layer with uneven thickness: The Tyrrhenian Sea density model. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors166, 105–111.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ChakravarthiV. and SundararajanN.2007. 3D gravity inversion of basement relief –A depth‐dependent density approach. Geophysics72, I23–I32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. FarquharsonC.G.2008. Constructing piecewise‐constant models in multidimensional minimum‐structure inversions. Geophysics73, K1–K9.
    [Google Scholar]
13. FediM.1997. Estimation of density, magnetization, and depth to source: A nonlinear and noniterative 3‐D potential‐field method. Geophysics62, 814–830.
    [Google Scholar]
14. FediM.2007. DEXP: A fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources. Geophysics72, I1–I11.
    [Google Scholar]
15. FediM., FlorioG. and QuartaT.A.M.2009. Multiridge analysis of potential fields: Geometric method and reduced Euler deconvolution. Geophysics74, L53–L65.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gallardo‐DelgadoL.A., Pérez‐FloresM.A. and Gómez‐TreviñoE.2003. A versatile algorithm for joint 3D inversion of gravity and magnetic data. Geophysics68, 949–959.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GoussevS.A. and PeirceJ.A.2010. Magnetic basement: Gravity‐guided magnetic source depth analysis and interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting58, 321–334.
    [Google Scholar]
18. GuillenA. and MenichettiV.1984. Gravity and magnetic inversion with minimization of a specific functional. Geophysics49, 1354–1360.
    [Google Scholar]
19. GuspíF.1993. Noniterative nonlinear gravity inversion. Geophysics58, 935–940.
    [Google Scholar]
20. HansenR.O. and SimmondsM.1993. Multiple‐source Werner deconvolution. Geophysics58, 1792–1800.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HartmanR.R., TeskeyD.J. and FriedbergJ.L.1971. A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation. Geophysics36, 891–918.
    [Google Scholar]
22. JorgensenG. and KisabethJ.L.2000. Joint 3D inversion of gravity, magnetic and tensor gravity fields for imaging salt formations in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary , Alberta , Canada , Expanded Abstracts, 424–426.
23. KeatingP. and PilkingtonM.2004. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting52, 165–182.
    [Google Scholar]
24. KrahenbuhlR.A. and LiY.2006. Inversion of gravity data using a binary formulation. Geophysical Journal International167, 543–556.
    [Google Scholar]
25. KrahenbuhlR.A. and LiY.2009. Hybrid optimization for lithologic inversion and time‐lapse monitoring using a binary formulation. Geophysics74, I55–I65.
    [Google Scholar]
26. KuC.C. and SharpJ.A.1983. Werner deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt's inverse modeling. Geophysics48, 754–774.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LastB.J. and KubikK.1983. Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics48, 713–721.
    [Google Scholar]
28. LeãoJ.W.D., Menezes, P.T.L., BeltrãoJ.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.1996. Gravity inversion of basement relief constrained by the knowledge of depth at isolated points. Geophysics61, 1702–1714
    [Google Scholar]
29. LiY. and OldenburgD.W.1996. 3‐D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics61, 394–408.
    [Google Scholar]
30. LiY. and OldenburgD.W.1998. 3‐D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics63, 109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
31. LiY., ShearerS.E., HaneyM.M. and DannemillerN.2010. Comprehensive approaches to 3D inversion of magnetic data affected by remanent magnetization. Geophysics75, L1–L11.
    [Google Scholar]
32. LimaW.A., MartinsC.M., SilvaJ.B.C. and BarbosaV.C.F.2011. Total variation regularization for depth‐to‐basement estimate: Part 2 – Physicogeologic meaning and comparisons with previous inversion methods. Geophysics76, I13–I20.
    [Google Scholar]
33. MarquardtD.W.1963. An algorithm for least‐squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics11, 431–441.
    [Google Scholar]
34. MartinsC.M., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2010. Simultaneous 3D depth‐to‐basement and density‐contrast estimates using gravity data and depth control at few points. Geophysics75, I21–I28.
    [Google Scholar]
35. MartinsC.M., LimaW.A., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2011. Total variation regularization for depth‐to‐basement estimate: Part 1 – Mathematical details and applications. Geophysics76, I1–I12.
    [Google Scholar]
36. MoraesR.A.V. and HansenR.O.2001. Constrained inversion of gravity fields for complex 3D structures. Geophysics66, 501–510.
    [Google Scholar]
37. MushayandebvuM.F., LesurV., ReidA.B. and FairheadJ.D.2004. Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2‐D structures. Geophysics69, 489–496.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MushayandebvuM.F., Van DrielP., ReidA.B. and FairheadJ.D.2001. Magnetic source parameters of two‐dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution. Geophysics66, 814–823.
    [Google Scholar]
39. NabighianM.N., AnderM.E., GrauchV.J.S., HansenR.O., LaFehrT.R., LiY. et al . 2005. Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics70, 63ND–89ND.
    [Google Scholar]
40. NagiharaS. and HallS.A.2001. Three‐dimensional gravity inversion using simulated annealing: Constraints on the diapiric roots of allochthonous salt structures. Geophysics66, 1438–1449.
    [Google Scholar]
41. NaudyH.1971. Automatic determination of depth on aeromagnetic profiles. Geophysics36, 717–722.
    [Google Scholar]
42. NunesT.M., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2008. Magnetic basement depth inversion in the space domain. Pure and Applied Geophysics165, 1891–1911.
    [Google Scholar]
43. O’BrienD.P.1972. CompuDepth – A new method for depth‐to‐basement calculation. 42nd SEG meeting, Anaheim , California , USA , Expanded Abstracts.
44. OezsenR.2004. Velocity modelling and prestack depth imaging below complex salt structures: A case history from on‐shore Germany. Geophysical Prospecting52, 693–705.
    [Google Scholar]
45. OldenburgD.W.1974. The inversion and interpretation of gravity anomalies. Geophysics39, 526–536.
    [Google Scholar]
46. OstrowskiJ.A., PilkingtonM. and TeskeyD.J.1993. Werner deconvolution for variable altitude aeromagnetic data. Geophysics58, 1481–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
47. ParkerR.L.1973. The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society31, 447–455.
    [Google Scholar]
48. PhillipsJ.D.1997. Potential‐field geophysical software for the PC, version 2.2. US Geological Survey Open‐File Report 97–725.
49. PilkingtonM.2006. Joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data for two‐layer models. Geophysics71, L35–L42.
    [Google Scholar]
50. PilkingtonM.2009. 3D magnetic data‐space inversion with sparseness constraints. Geophyisics74, L7–L15.
    [Google Scholar]
51. PilkingtonM. and CrossleyD.J.1986. Determination of crustal interface topography from potential fields. Geophysics51, 1277–1284.
    [Google Scholar]
52. PortniaguineO. and ZhdanovM.S.1999. Focusing geophysical inversion images. Geophysics64, 874–887.
    [Google Scholar]
53. PortniaguineO. and ZhdanovM.S.2002. 3‐D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing. Geophysics67, 1532–1541.
    [Google Scholar]
54. RaoB.S.R., Radhakrishna MurthyI.V. and Visweswara RaoC.1975. A successive approximation method of deriving residual gravity. Geoexploration13, 129–135
    [Google Scholar]
55. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MillettA.J. and SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
56. RichardsonM.R. and MacInnesS.C.1989. The inversion of gravity data into three‐dimensional polyhedral models. Journal of Geophysical Research94, 7555–7562.
    [Google Scholar]
57. RouthP.S., JorgensenG.J. and KisabethJ.L.2001. Base of the salt imaging using gravity and tensor Gravity data. 71st SEG meeting, San Antonio , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1482–1484.
58. RudinL.OsherS. and FatemiE.1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D60, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
59. SalemA. and RavatD.2003. A combined analytic signal and Euler method (AN‐EUL) for automatic interpretation of magnetic data. Geophysics68, 1952–1961.
    [Google Scholar]
60. SalemA., WilliamsS.E., FairheadJ.D., SmithR. and RavatD.2008. Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt‐angle derivatives. Geophysics73, L1–L10.
    [Google Scholar]
61. SilvaJ.B.C. and BarbosaV.C.F.2003. 3D Euler deconvolution: Theoretical basis for automatically selecting good solutions. Geophysics68, 1962–1968.
    [Google Scholar]
62. SilvaJ.B.C. and BarbosaV.C.F.2004. Generalized radial inversion of 2D potential field data. Geophysics69, 1405–1413.
    [Google Scholar]
63. SilvaJ.B.C. and BarbosaV.C.F.2006. Interactive gravity inversion. Geophysics71, J1–J9.
    [Google Scholar]
64. SilvaJ.B.C., BarbosaV.C.F. and MedeirosW.E.2001a. Scattering, symmetry, and bias analysis of source position estimates in Euler deconvolution and its practical implications. Geophysics66, 1149–1156.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Silva DiasF.J.S., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2007. 2D gravity inversion of a complex interface in the presence of interfering sources. Geophysics72, I13–I22.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Silva DiasF.J.S., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2009. 3D gravity inversion through an adaptive learning procedure. Geophysics74, I9–I21.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Silva DiasF.J.S., BarbosaV.C.F. and SilvaJ.B.C.2011. Adaptive learning 3D gravity inversion for salt body imaging. Geophysics76, I49–I57.
    [Google Scholar]
68. SilvaJ.B.C., MedeirosW.E. and BarbosaV.C.F.2001b. Pitfalls in nonlinear inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics158, 945–964.
    [Google Scholar]
69. SilvaJ.B.C., MedeirosW.E. and BarbosaV.C.F.2001c. Potential‐field inversion: Choosing the appropriate technique to solve a geologic problem. Geophysics66, 511–520.
    [Google Scholar]
70. SilvaJ.B.C., MedeirosW.E. and BarbosaV.C.F.2002. Practical applications of uniqueness theorems in gravimetry: Part I – Constructing sound interpretation methods. Geophysics67, 788–794.
    [Google Scholar]
71. SilvaJ.B.C., OliveiraA.S. and BarbosaV.C.F.2010. Gravity inversion of 2D basement relief using entropic regularization. Geophysics75, I29–I35.
    [Google Scholar]
72. SpectorA. and GrantF.1970. Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics35, 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
73. StarichP.J., LewisG.G., FaulknerJ., StandleyP.G. and SetterquistS.1994. Integrated geophysical study of an onshore salt dome. The Leading Edge13, 880–884.
    [Google Scholar]
74. SybergF.J.R.1972. A Fourier method for the regional‐residual problem of potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting20, 47–75.
    [Google Scholar]
75. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
76. ThurstonJ.B. and SmithR.S.1997. Automated conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip and susceptibility contrast using the SPI ™ method. Geophysics62, 807–813
    [Google Scholar]
77. TikhonovA.N. and ArseninV.Y.1977. Solutions of Ill‐posed Problems . Winston and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
78. VogelC.R. and OmanM.E.1998. Fast, robust total variation‐based reconstruction of noisy blurred images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing7, 813–824.
    [Google Scholar]
79. WernerS.1953. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies at sheet‐like bodies. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, Ser. C, Arsbok43(6).
    [Google Scholar]
80. YargerH., DeKayL. and HenselE.G.2001. Salt canopy modeling with gravity in deepwater Gulf of Mexico. 71st SEG meeting, San Antonio , Texas , USA , Expanded Abstracts, 1478–1482.