1887
Volume 9 Number 6
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In the last decades, geophysicists and seismologists have focused their attention on the inversion of empirical surface‐waves’ dispersion curves from microtremor measurements for estimating the S‐wave velocity structure at a site. This procedure allows a fast and convenient investigation without strong active sources, which are difficult to deploy especially in urban areas.

In this study we report on a 2D seismic noise array experiment carried out at Bevagna (central Italy) near the station BVG of the Italian Accelerometric Network (RAN). The site was investigated within the DPC‐INGV S4 Project (2007‐2009). The Rayleigh‐ and Love‐waves dispersion characteristics were estimated using different methods. The inversion of the dispersion curves was then performed independently, obtaining two estimations for the S‐wave velocity profiles. The results of cross‐hole logging near the seismic station are used for a comparison.

The shear‐wave velocity profiles estimated by microtremor analyses range up to 150 m depth. The two independent procedures provide consistent shear‐wave velocity profiles for the shallow part of the model (20–30 m in depth) in agreement with the results of the cross‐hole logging. Some problems arise between 30–40 m in depth in the profile estimated by surface waves. In this range cross‐hole logging evidences an inversion of the S‐wave velocity. Although the cross‐hole logging stops at 40 m of depth, we are confident about the results provided by the Rayleigh‐wave analysis below 40–50 m. This case study suggests that greater efforts should be devoted to exploit the potential of a coupled analysis of Rayleigh and Love waves from microtremor array measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011031
2011-05-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK.1957. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute35, 415–456.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AraiH. and TokimatsuK.2004. S‐wave velocity profiling by inversion of microtremor H/V spectrum. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 53–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CaponJ.1969. High‐resolution frequency‐wavenumber spectrum analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE57, 1408–1418.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FähD., StammG. and HavenithH.‐B.2008. Analysis of three‐component ambient vibration array measurements. Geophysical Journal International172, 199–213. doi:10.1111/j.1365‐246.X.2007.03625.x
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ForbrigerT.2006. Low‐frequency limit for H/V studies due to tilt. Sitzung der Arbeitsgruppe Seismologie des FKPE, Haidhof, Germany, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FotiS., ParolaiS., AlbarelloD. and PicozziM.2011. Application of surface‐wave methods for seismic site characterization. Surveys in Geophysics. doi:10.1007/s10712‐011‐9134‐2
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GardnerG.H.F., GardnerL.W. and GregoryA.R.1974. Formation velocity and density; The diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics39, 770–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HerrmannR.B., AmmonC.J., JuliaJ. and MokhtarT.1999. Joint inversion of receiver functions and surface‐wave dispersion for crustal structure. Proceedings of the 21st Seismic Research Symposium Technologies for Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, 21–24 September, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, Expanded Abstracts. Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA‐UR‐99‐4700.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HorikeM.1985. Inversion of phase velocity of long period microtremors to the S‐wave velocity structure down to the basement in urbanized areas. Journal of Physics of the Earth33, 59–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KitsunezakiC., GotoN., KobayashiY., IkawaT., HorikeM., SaitoT., KurotaT., YamaneK. and OkozumiK.1990. Estimation of P‐ and S‐wave velocities in deep soil deposits for evaluating ground vibrations in earthquake. J.JSNDS9, 1–17 (in Japanese with English abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KöhlerA., OhrnbergerM., ScherbaumF., WatheletM. and CornouC.2007. Assessing the reliability of the modified three‐component spatial autocorrelation technique. Geophysical Journal International168, 779–796.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KonnoK. and OhmachiT.1998. Ground‐motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 228–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LacossR.T., KellyE.J. and ToksözM.N.1969. Estimation of seismic noise structure using arrays. Geophysics34, 21–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LermoJ. and Chavez‐GarciaF.J.1994. Are microtremors useful insite response evaluation?Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America84, 1350–1364.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NakamuraY.1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of RTRI30, 25–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. OhoriM., NobataA. and WakamatsuK.2002. A comparison of ESAC and FK methods of estimating phase velocity using arbitrarily shaped microtremor analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 2323–2332.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OhrnbergerM., ScherbaumF., KrugerF., PelzingR. and ReamerS. K.2004. How good are shear‐wave velocity models obtained from inversion of ambient vibrations in the lower Rhine embayment (N.W. Germany)?Bolletino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata45, 215–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. OkadaH.2003. The Microtremor Survey Method. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ParolaiS., MucciarelliM., GallipoliM.R., RichwalskiS.M. and StrolloA.2007. Comparison of empirical and numerical site responses at the Tito Test Site, southern Italy. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America97, 1413–1431.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ParolaiS., PicozziM., RichwalskiS.M. and MilkereitC.2005. Joint inversion of phase velocity dispersion and H/V ratio curves from seismic noise recordings using a genetic algorithm, considering higher modes. Geophysical Research Letters32, L01303. doi:10.1029/2004GL021115
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ParolaiS., RichwalskiS.M., MilkereitC. and FähD.2006. S‐wave velocity profile for earthquake engineering purposes for the Cologne area (Germany). Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute4, 65–94. doi:10.1007/s10518‐005‐5758‐2
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PicozziM., ParolaiS. and BindiD.2010. De‐blurring of frequency‐wave‐number images from small‐size seismic arrays. Geophysical Journal International181, 357–368. doi:10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2009.04471.x
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SoccoL.V., FotiS. and BoieroD.2010. Surface wave analysis for building near surface velocity models: Established approaches and new perspectives. Geophysics75, A83–A102
    [Google Scholar]
  24. TokeshiK., KarkeeM. and CuadraC.2008. Estimation of Vs profile using its natural frequency and Rayleigh‐wave dispersion characteristics. Advances in Geosciences14, 75–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TokimatsuK.1997. Geotechnical site characterization using surface waves. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Expanded Abstracts, 1333–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. TokimatsuK., TamuraS. and KojimaH.1992. Effects of multiple modes on Rayleigh wave dispersion characteristics. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering118, 1529–1543.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WangR.1999. A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America89, 733–741.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WatheletM.2005. Array recordings of ambient vibrations: Surface‐wave inversion. PhD thesis, Université de Liège, Faculté des Sciences Appliquées.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Working Group ITACA.
    Working Group ITACA.2010. Database of the Italian strong motion records. http://itaca.mi.ingv.it/ItacaNet/ (accessed on February 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. XiaJ., MillerR.D. and ParkC.B.1999. Estimation of near‐surface shear‐wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics64, 691–700.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. YamanakaH. and IshidaH.1996. Application of generic algorithms to an inversion of surface‐wave dispersion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America86, 436–444.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011031
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error