1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 60, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 60 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A gravity survey on the scale of 1: 250 000 was carried out in Block L2 located in the Lamu basin of south‐east Kenya in order to study tectonic features and find out favourable petroleum prospects in the block. This paper, through data processing and synthetic interpretation of the measured gravity data in the block, discusses characteristics of the gravity field and their geological implications, determines the fault system and the basement depth, analyses features of the main strata, divides structure units and predicts favourable petroleum zones. In the block, the regional gravity anomaly is mainly caused by the inclined Moho surface that rises in the east and subsides in the west topographically and the Bouguer gravity anomaly primarily reflects the superimposition of the gravity effect derived from the Moho surface and the basement relief. Two groups of faults extending NW (NWW) and NE (NEE) respectively are dominant in the block and their activities resulted in the framework of east‐west zoning and south‐north blocking. The basement depth greatly changes in an alternative high and low pattern. The Permian‐Triassic, Jurassic and Tertiary strata are extensively developed, while the Cretaceous is only developed in the east of the block. Structurally, the block can be divided into five units, of which the Tana sag shows excellent source‐reservoir‐seal associations and is a favourable target for future petroleum exploration.

© 2011 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
2011-07-08
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BEICIP
    BEICIP1987. Geological Map of Kenya (3 sheets: Geology, Geology and Subsurface Structure, Geology and Gravity Anomalies). Scale 1:1000000. Republic of Kenya, Ministry of Energy and Regional Development.
  2. CellaF., FediM. and FlorioG.2009. Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting57, 543–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited (CNOOC)
    China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited (CNOOC)2007. The study on petroleum geology at block L2, L3, L4 in Kenya (in Chinese).
  4. CoffinM.F.1992. The East African and Madagascan margins: Stratigraphy, structure and tectonics. Proceedings 1st Indian Ocean Petroleum Seminar, Indian Ocean – 1st Regional Seminar on Petroleum Exploration, Seychelles , Expanded Abstracts, 325–343.
  5. CoffinM.F. and RabinowitzP.D.1988. Evolution of the conjugate East African‐Madagascar margins and the western Somali Basin. Special Paper Geological Society of America, 226, pp. 1–78. Geological Society of America.
  6. CooperG.R.J. and CowanD.R.2006. Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers and Geosciences32, 1585–1591.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Department of Geology, Leicester University
    Department of Geology, Leicester University1977. Kenya, a catalogue of gravity measurements. A compilation of compatible data collected between 1955 and 1975 with an account of survey and reduction procedures, England .
  8. FanM.L.2006. The study and application of Euler deconvolution method . PhD thesis, Jilin University.
  9. HankelO.1994. Early Permian to Middle Jurassic rifting and sedimentation in East Africa and Madagascar. Geologische Rundschau83, 703–710.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kenya SUN Oil Company
    Kenya SUN Oil Company1975. Seismic section, LOC 38‐D.
  11. MaendeA.1996. Source rock potential of Lamu Basin, Kenya. Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the Afro‐Asian Association of Petroleum Geochemists, Arusha , Tanzania , 2–6 June 1996, 408–421. Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC).
  12. MaendeA.2003. Petroleum potential of Kenya. AAPG meeting, Salt Lake City , Utah , USA , 11–14 May, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MaendeA. and DansonG.M.1994. Source rock potential of Lamu Basin. Geo94, the Middle East Geosciences Exhibition and Conference, Manama , Bahrain , Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. M’MukindiaM.K.2004. Kenya: new opening for international players. 11th Annual Africa Upstream Conference 2004, Cape Town , South Africa , 6–8 October 2004, Expanded Abstracts.
  15. M’MukindiaM.K.2005. Petroleum potential and investment opportunities in Kenya. East African Petroleum Conference (EAPC’05), Entebbe , Uganda , 2–4 March 2005, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK)
    National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK)1993. Petroleum exploration opportunities in the Lamu Basin of southeast Kenya.
  17. NyagahK.1995. Stratigraphy, depositional history and environments of deposition of Cretaceous through Tertiary strata in the Lamu Basin, southeast Kenya and implications for reservoirs for hydrocarbon exploration. Sedimentary Geology96, 43–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. OdadaE.O.1996. Geological evolution of coastal Kenya as inferred from sedimentary sequences and marine terraces. Africa Geoscience Review3, 367–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ParkerR.L.1974. The rapid calculation of potential anomalies. Geophysics31, 447–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SestiniG.1993. Somali and East African rift basins. Africa Exploration Opportunities, Petroconsultants Non‐Exclusive Report, 1–247. Petroconsultants SA, Geneva , Switzerland .
  21. TengJ.W., ZengR.S., YanY.F. and ZhangH.2003. Depth distribution of Moho and tectonic framework in eastern Asian continent and its adjacent ocean areas. Science in China (Series D)46, 428–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. VerduzcoB., FairheadJ.D., GreenC.M. and MackenzieC.2004. New insights into magnetic derivatives. The Leading Edge22, 116–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. WijnsC., PerezC. and KowalczykP.2005. Theta map: Edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics70, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ZengH.L.2005. Gravity Field and Gravity Exploration . Geological Publishing House, Beijing .
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ZengH.L., ZhangQ.H. and LiuJ.1994. Location of secondary faults from cross‐correlation of the second vertical derivative of gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting42, 841–854.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
Loading
Gravity field and tectonic features of Block L2 in the Lamu basin, Kenya
Geophysical Prospecting 60, 161 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00961.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Block L2; Favourable petroleum zone; Gravity field; Kenya; Tectonic feature

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error