1887
Volume 10 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Stepped frequency continuous wave ground penetrating radar (GPR) systems allow highly detailed data sets to be collected across a wide bandwidth using a multi‐element array antenna, such as the 3D‐radar GeoScope system. Although the final presentation of the results is similar to time‐domain systems, the correct processing of the initial frequency domain data acquired in the field is essential to obtain the maximum information from the site. Processing begins with the identification of a suitable frequency window for conversion to the time‐domain using an inverse Fourier transform and demonstrates how the use of a varying frequency window with depth can improve the final results. Various methods for background subtraction to minimize the loss of data quality and cope with the strong surface reflection experienced by an air‐launched antenna are also explored. The geometry of the air‐launched antenna is also considered with specific regard to developing a three‐dimensional migration model that accounts for the variation in a signal response expected from such a system. This paper explores these themes with relation to data from archaeological sites and also considers the data processing challenges presented by high density (e.g., 0.075 m x 0.075 m) multi‐hectare surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011046
2011-11-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BinningsbøJ., EideE. and HjelmstadJ.2000. 3D migration of GPR array antenna data. In, GPR 2000: Eighth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2000 (Gold Coast, Australia).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BoothA., LinfordN., ClarkR.A. and MurrayT.2008. Three‐Dimensional, Multi‐Offset Ground‐Penetrating Radar Imaging of Archaeological Targets. Archaeological Prospection15(2), 93–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DanielsD.
    Ed. 2004. Ground Penetrating Radar. London, IEE.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EideE.S. and HjelmstadJ.F.2002. 3D utility mapping using electronically scanned antenna array. In, GPR 2002. Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2002 (Santa Barbara). 192–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GrasmueckM., WegerR. and HorstmeyerH.2005. Full‐resolution 3D GPR imaging. Geophysics70, K12–K19.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LeckebuschJ.2003. Ground‐Penetrating Radar: A modern three‐dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection10(4), 213–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LeckebuschJ.2007. Short Report Pull‐up/Pull‐down Corrections for Ground‐penetrating Radar Data. Archaeological Prospection14(2), 142–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LeckebuschJ.2009. Test and data processing of a stepped‐frequency GPR array. ArcheoSciences, revue d’archéométrie Mémoire du sol, espace des hommes (33‐2009), 305–307.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LeckebuschJ.2011. Comparison of a stepped‐frequency and a pulsed GPR system. Archaeological Prospection18(1), 15–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LinfordN.2004. From Hypocaust to Hyperbola: Ground Penetrating Radar surveys over mainly Roman remains in the U.K. Archaeological Prospection11(4), 237–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LinfordN.2006. The application of geophysical methods to archaeological prospection. Reports on Progress in Physics69, 2205–2257.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LinfordN., LinfordP., MartinL. and PayneA.2007. Geophysical Evidence for Assessing Plough Damage. Študijné zvesti Archeologického ústavu SAV41, 212–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LinfordN., LinfordP., MartinL. and PayneA.2009. Stepped‐frequency GPR survey with a multi‐element array antenna: Results from field application on archaeological sites. ArcheoSciences, revue d’archéométrie Mémoire du sol, espace des hommes (33‐2009), 317–319.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the Roman Civil Town Carnuntum, Austria: An approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OrfanidisS.J.1996. Introduction to Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice‐Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. TjoraS., EideE. and LundheimL.2004. Evaluation of Methods for Ground Bounce Removal in GPR Utility Mapping. In, Tenth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar 2004 (Delft, The Netherlands). 379–382.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011046
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2011046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error