From pseudo‐3D to full‐resolution GPR imaging of a complex Roman site

References

1. BerardB.A. and MaillolJ.M.2008. Common‐ and multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar multi‐offset study of a Roman villa, Tourega, Portugal. Archaeological Prospection15, 32–46.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BoothA.D., LinfordN., ClarkR. and MurrayT.2008. Three‐dimensional, multi‐offset ground‐penetrating radar imaging of archaeological targets. Archaeological Prospection15, 93–112.
   [Google Scholar]
3. FranceseR.G., FinziE. and MorelliG.2009. 3‐D high‐resolution multichannel radar investigation of a Roman village in Northern Italy. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 44–51. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.004
   [Google Scholar]
4. GoodmanD., HongoH., HigashiN., InaokaH. and NishimuraY.2007. GPR survey over burial mounds: Correcting for topography and the tilt of the GPR antenna. Near Surface Geophysics5, 383–388.
   [Google Scholar]
5. GoodmanD., SteinbergJ., DamiataB., NishimuraY., SchneiderK., HiromichiH. and HigashiN.2006. GPR overlay analysis for archaeological prospection. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
6. GrasmueckM., WegerR. and HorstmeyerH.2004. Three‐dimensional ground penetrating radar imaging of sedimentary structures, fractures, and archaeological features at submeter resolution. Geology32, 933–936.
   [Google Scholar]
7. GrasmueckM., WegerR. and HorstmeyerH.2005. Full‐resolution 3D GPR imaging Geophysics70, K12–K19.
   [Google Scholar]
8. LeckebuschJ.2003. Ground‐penetrating radar: A modern three‐dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection10, 213–240.
   [Google Scholar]
9. LinfordN.2004. From hypocaust to hyperbola: Ground‐penetrating radar surveys over mainly Roman remains in the UK. Archaeological Prospection11, 237–246.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LinfordN., LinfordP., MartinL. and PayneA.2010. Stepped frequency ground‐penetrating radar survey with a multi‐element array antenna: Results from field application on archaeological sites. Archaeological Prospection17, 187–198.
    [Google Scholar]
11. NovoA., GrasmueckM., ViggianoD.A. and LorenzoH.2008a. 3D GPR in archaeology: What can be gained from dense data acquisition and processing?Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 16–19 June, Birmingham, UK, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
12. PiroS., GoodmanD. and NishimuraY.2003. The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano’s villa (Altopiani di Arcinazzo, Roma) using high‐resolution integrated geophysical surveys. Archaeological Prospection10, 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
13. TrinksI., JohanssonB., GustafssonJ., EmilssonJ., FriborgJ., GustafssonC. and NissenJ.2010. Efficient, large‐scale archaeological prospection using a true three‐dimensional ground‐penetrating radar array system. Archaeological Prospection17, 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]
14. UrbiniS., CafarellaL., MarchettiM., ChiarucciP. and BoniniD.2007. Fast geophysical prospecting applied to archaeology: Results at ‘Villa ai Cavallacci’ (Albano Laziale, Rome) site. Annals of Geophysics50, 291–299.
    [Google Scholar]
15. UtsiE. and AlaniA.2002. Barcombe Roman villa: An exercise in GPR time slicing and comparative geophysics. 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 29 April–2 May, Santa Barbara, California USA, Expanded Abstracts, 102–107.
    [Google Scholar]