The application of spatial derivatives to non‐potential field data interpretation

References

1. BeamishD.2002. The canopy effect in airborne EM. Geophysics67, 1720–1728.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BeamishD.2004a. 3D modeling of near‐surface, environmental effects on AEM data. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 213–217.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BeamishD.2004b. Airborne EM skin depths. Geophysical Prospecting52, 439–449.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BeamishD., KimbellG.S., StoneP. and AndersonT.B.2010. Regional conductivity data used to reassess Lower Palaeozoic structure in the Northern Ireland sector of the Southern Uplands–Down‐Longford terrane. Journal of the Geological Society, London167, 1–9.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BeamishD. and WhiteJ.C.2011. Aeromagnetic data in the UK: A study of the information content of baseline and modern surveys across Anglesey, North Wales. Geophysical Journal International184, 171–190.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BeamishD. and YoungM.2009. Geophysics of Northern Ireland: The Tellus effect. First Break27, 43–49.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BlakelyR.J.1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 052 41508X.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BlakelyR.J. and SimpsonR.W.1986. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics51, 1494–1498.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChacksfieldB.C.2010. A preliminary interpretation of Tellus airborne magnetic and electromagnetic data for Northern Ireland. British Geological Survey Internal Report IR/07/041.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CooperG.R.J., CombrinckM. and CowanD.R.2004. The application of Euler deconvolution to airborne EM data. 17th ASEG Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Sydney , Australia , Expanded Abstracts.
11. CooperG.R.J. and CowanD.R.2006. Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers & Geosciences32, 1585–1591.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CooperG.R.J. and CowanD.R.2008. Edge enhancement of potential‐field data using normalized statistics. Geophysics73, H1–H4.
    [Google Scholar]
13. FairheadJ.D., GreenC.M., VerduzcoB. and MackenzieC.2004. A new set of magnetic field derivatives for mapping mineral prospects. 17th ASEG Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Sydney , Australia , Expanded Abstracts.
14. FlorioG., FediM. and PastekaR.2006. On the application of Euler deconvolution to the analytic signal. Geophysics71, L87–L93.
    [Google Scholar]
15. FraserD.C.1978. Resistivity mapping with an airborne multicoil electromagnetic system. Geophysics43, 144–172.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GibsonP.J.2004. Geophysical characteristics of the Tow Valley fault in north‐east Ireland. Irish Journal of Earth Sciences22, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HabashyT.M., GroomR.W. and SpiesB.R.1993. Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering. Journal of Geophysical Research98, 1759–1775.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HornB.K.P.1982. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Geoprocessing2, 65–146.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HuttonD.W.H.1987. Strike‐slip terranes and a model for the evolution of the British and Irish Caledonides. Geological Magazine124, 405–425.
    [Google Scholar]
20. KovacsA., HolladayJ.S. and BergeronC.J.Jr. 1995. The footprint/altitude ratio for helicopter electromagnetic sounding of sea‐ice thickness: Comparison of theoretical and field estimates. Geophysics60, 374–380.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LahtiM., BeamishD., CussR.J. and WilliamsJ.2007. Deculturing of the Northern Ireland Tellus magnetic data. British Geological Survey Technical Report IR/07/147.
22. LahtiI. and KarinenT.2010. Tilt derivative multiscale edges of magnetic data. The Leading Edge29, 24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LeväniemiH., BeamishD., HautaniemiH., KurimoM., SuppalaI., VironmäkiJ. et al . 2009. The JAC airborne EM system AEM‐05. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 219–233.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LiX.2003. On the use of different methods for estimating magnetic depth. The Leading Edge22, 1090–1099.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LiuG. and BeckerA.1990. Two‐dimensional mapping of sea‐ice keels with airborne electromagnetics. Geophysics55, 239–248.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McGillivrayP.R., OldenburgD.W., EllisR.G. and HabashyT.M.1994. Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency domain electromagnetic problem. Geophysical Journal International116, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MillerH.G. and SinghV.1994. Potential field tilt – A new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 213–217.
    [Google Scholar]
28. MitchellW.I.2004. The Geology of Northern Ireland: Our Natural Foundation . Geological Survey of Northern Ireland. ISBN 0852724543.
    [Google Scholar]
29. NabighianM.N.1972. The analytical signal of two‐dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross‐section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics37, 507–517.
    [Google Scholar]
30. NabighianM.N., GrauchV.J.S., HansenR.O., LaFehrT.R., Li, Y., PeirceJ.W. et al . 2005. The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics70, 33ND–61ND.
    [Google Scholar]
31. ParnellJ., EarlsG., WilkinsonJ.J., HuttonD.H.W., BoyceA.J., FallickA.E. et al . 2000. Regional fluid flow and gold mineralization in the Dalradian of the Sperrin Mountains, Northern Ireland. Economic Geology95, 1380–1416.
    [Google Scholar]
32. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MilletA.J. and SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
33. RoestW.R., VerhoefJ. and PilkingtonM.1992. Magnetic interpretation using 3‐D analytic signal. Geophysics57,116–125.
    [Google Scholar]
34. RoyA.1966. Downward continuation and its application to electromagnetic data interpretation. Geophysics31, 167–184.
    [Google Scholar]
35. SalemA., WilliamsS., FairheadD., RavatD. and SmithR.2007. Tilt‐depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first‐order magnetic derivatives. The Leading Edge26, 1502–1505.
    [Google Scholar]
36. SalemA., WilliamsS., FairheadD., SmithR. and RavatD.2008. Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt‐angle derivatives. Geophysics73, L1–L10.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SasakiY.2001. Full 3‐D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC. Journal of Applied Geophysics46, 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
38. M.‐L.Airo
    SuppalaI., OksamaM. and HongistoH.2005. GTK airborne EM system: Characteristics and interpretation guidelines. In: Aerogeophysics in Finland1972–2004: Methods, System Characteristics and Applications (ed. M.‐L.Airo ), pp. 103–118. Geological Survey of Finland. ISBN 9516909159.
    [Google Scholar]
39. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
40. TølbøllR.J. and ChristensenN.B.2006. Robust 1D inversion and analysis of helicopter electromagnetic (HEM) data. Geophysics71, 53–62.
    [Google Scholar]
41. VerduzcoB., FairheadJ.D., GreenC.M. and MackenzieC.2004. New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. The Leading Edge23, 116–119.
    [Google Scholar]
42. WeideltP.1981. Dipolinduktion in einer dünnen platte mit leitfähiger umgebung und deckschicht. Report 89727, BGR, Hannover.