Multi‐method geophysical mapping of quick clay

References

1. Andersson‐SköldY., TorranceJ.K., LindB., OdénK., StevensR.L. and RankkaK.2005. Quick clay ‐ A case study of chemical perspective in Southwest Sweden. Engineering Geology82, 107‐118.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AstenM.W. and BooreD.M.2005. Comparison of shear‐velocity profiles of unconsolidated sediments near the Coyote borehole (CCOC) measured with fourteen invasive and non‐invasive methods, U.S. Geological Survey Open‐File Report. 2005‐1169.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BjerrumL.1954. Geotechnical properties of Norwegian marine clays. Géotechnique4, 49‐69.
   [Google Scholar]
4. E.W.Brand
   BrennerR.P., NutalayaP., ChilingarinG.V. and RobertsonJ.D.1981. Engineering geology of soft clay In: Soft Clay Engineering (eds. E.W.Brand and R.P.Brenner ), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 159‐240.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CalvertH.T. and HydeC.S.B.2002. Assessing landslide hazard in the Ottawa Valley using electrical and electromagnetic methods. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), February 10‐14, 2002, Las Vegas, Nevada. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CercatoM.2009. Addressing non‐uniqueness in linearized multichannel surface wave inversion. Geophysical Prospecting57, 27‐47.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DahlinT., LarssonR., LerouxV., LarssonR. and RankkaK.2005. Resistivity imaging for mapping of quick clays for landslide risk assessment. Proceedings of 11th Annual Meeting EAGE ‐ Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Palermo, Italy, 4‐7 September 2005. A046.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DonohueS. and LongM.2008. An assessment of the MASW technique incorporating discrete particle modelling. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics13(2), 57‐68.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DonohueS. and LongM.2010. Assessment of sample quality in soft clay using shear wave velocity and suction measurements. Géotechnique60(11), 883‐889. doi: 10.1680/geot.8.T.007.3741
   [Google Scholar]
10. DonohueS., TolooiyanA. and GavinK.2011. Geophysical and geotechnical assessment of a railway embankment failure. Near Surface Geophysics9(1), 33‐44. doi: 10.3997/1873‐0604.2010040
    [Google Scholar]
11. Geonics Ltd.
    Geonics Ltd.1984. Operating manual for EM‐31‐D non‐contacting terrain conductivity meter. Geonics, Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
12. GöranssonG.I., BendzD. and LarsonP.M.2009. Combining landslide and contaminant risk: A preliminary assessment. Journal of Soils and Sediments933‐45. doi: 10.1007/s11368‐008‐0035‐z
    [Google Scholar]
13. GregersenO.1981. The quick clay landslide in Rissa, Norway. Contribution to the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute 135, 6p.
    [Google Scholar]
14. deGroot‐HedlinC. and ConstableS.1990. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two‐dimensional models form magnetotelluric data. Geophysics55, 1613‐1624.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HagedoornJ.G.1959. The plus‐minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophysical Prospecting7, 158‐182.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HelleT.E., PfaffhuberA.A., RømoenM. and ForsbergC.F.2009. SIP12 ‐ Correlation between horizontal and vertical resistivity measurements. NGI Report 20081135‐1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JanbuN.1974. Written discussion to European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT‐I, Stockholm, Proceedings 2.1, 132‐134.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KenneyT.C.1964. Sea‐level movements and the geological histories of the post‐glacial marine soils at Boston, Nicolet, Ottawa and Oslo. Géotechnique14(3), 203‐230.
    [Google Scholar]
19. LaiC.G., FotiS. and RixG.J.2005. Propagation of data uncertainty in surface wave inversion. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics10, 219‐228.
    [Google Scholar]
20. LokeM.H.2004. Res2DInv ver. 3.54. Geoelectrical Imaging 2D and 3D. Instruction Manual. Geotomo Software.
    [Google Scholar]
21. LokeM.H. and BarkerR.D.1996. Rapid least‐squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi‐Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting44, 131‐152.
    [Google Scholar]
22. LokeM.H. and DahlinT.2002. A comparison of the Gauss‐Newton and quasi‐Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics49, 149‐162.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LøkenT. 1968. Kvikkleiredannelse og kjemisk forvitring i norske leirer. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo. Publication75, 19‐26. (In Norwegian)
    [Google Scholar]
24. LongM. and DonohueS.2007. In situ shear wave velocity from multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) tests at eight Norwegian research sites. Canadian Geotechnical Journal44(5), 533‐544.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LongM. and DonohueS.2010. Characterisation of Norwegian marine clays with combined shear wave velocity and CPTU data. Canadian Geotechnical Journal47(5), 709‐718.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LongM., DonohueS., O'ConnorP. and QuigleyP.2009. Relationship between shear wave velocity and undrained shear strength of Irish glacial tills. Proceedings of the EAGE Near Surface 2009, 15th Annual Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, September. Paper A13.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LukeB. and Calderón‐MacíasC.2007. Inversion of seismic surface wave data to resolve complex profiles. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering133(2), 155‐165.
    [Google Scholar]
28. LundströmK., LarssonR. and DahlinT.2009. Mapping of quick clay formations using geotechnical and geophysical methods. Landslides6, 1‐15
    [Google Scholar]
29. LuoY., XiaJ., LiuJ., XuY. and LiuQ.2008. Generation of a pseudo‐2D shear‐wave velocity section by inversion of a series of 1D dispersion curves. Journal of Applied Geophysics64(3‐4), 115‐124.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McMechanG.A. and YedlinM.J.1981. Analysis of dispersive waves by wave field transformation. Geophysics46, 869‐874.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MitchellJ.K.1993. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. John Wiley, New York
    [Google Scholar]
32. MossR.E.S.2008. Quantifying measurement uncertainty of thirty‐meter shear‐wave velocity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98, 1399‐1411.
    [Google Scholar]
33. NGI
    NGI . 1985. Øvre Eiker kommune. Stabilitetsforholdene på Strandajordet, Vestfossen etter utglidningen den 11.september 1984 NGI‐report 85002‐01, dated 26.4.1985
    [Google Scholar]
34. NguyenF., GaramboisS., JongmansD., LokeM.H. and PirardE.2005, Image processing of 2D resistivity data for imaging faults. Journal of Applied Geophysics57, 260‐277.
    [Google Scholar]
35. PalmerD.1980. The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, 104
    [Google Scholar]
36. ParkC.B., MillerD.M. and XiaJ.1999. Multichannel Analysis of surface waves. Geophysics64 (3), 800‐808.
    [Google Scholar]
37. RankkaK., Anderssen‐SkoldY., HultenC., LarssonR., LerouxV. and DahlinT.2004. Quick clay in Sweden. Report 65, Swedish Geotechnical Institute. Linkoping.
    [Google Scholar]
38. RobertsonP.K.1990. Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal27(1), 151‐158.
    [Google Scholar]
39. RyggN.1988. Rotary pressure sounding: 20 years of experience. Proc. Pen Testing, 1988, ISOPT‐1, DeRuiter ed., Balkema, 453‐457.
    [Google Scholar]
40. SasakiY.1989. Two‐dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole‐dipole resistivity data. Geophysics54, 254‐262.
    [Google Scholar]
41. SöderblomR. 1969. Salt in Swedish clays and its importance for quick clay formation. Results from some field and laboratory studies. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Proceedings 22, Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
42. SolbergI.L., RønningJ.S., DalseggE., HansenL., RokoengenK. and SandvenR.2008. Resistivity measurements as a tool for outlining quick‐clay extent and valley‐fill stratigraphy: A feasibility study from Buvika, Central Norway. Canadian Geotechnical Journal45, 210‐225.
    [Google Scholar]
43. SørensenR. 1979. Late Weichselian deglaciation in the Oslofjord area, South Norway. Boreas8, 241‐246.
    [Google Scholar]
44. SørensenK.I. 1996. Pulled array continuous electrical profiling. First Break14, 85‐90.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ter‐StepanianG.2000. Quick clay landslides: Their enigmatic features and mechanism. The Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment59(1), 47‐57.
    [Google Scholar]
46. TorranceJ.K.1974. A laboratory investigation of the effect of leaching on the compressibility and shear strength of Norwegian marine clays. Géotechnique24(2), 155‐173.
    [Google Scholar]
47. WyrobekS.M.1956. Application of delay and intercept times in the interpretation of multi‐layer refraction time distance curves. Geophysical Prospecting4(2), 112‐130.
    [Google Scholar]
48. XiaJ., MillerR.D. and ParkC.B.1999. Estimation of near surface shear wave velocity by inversion of Raleigh waves. Geophysics64(3), 691‐700.
    [Google Scholar]
49. XiaJ., MillerR.D., ParkC.B., HunterJ.A., HarrisJ.B. and IvanovJ.2002. Comparing shear‐wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface wave with borehole measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering22, 181‐190.
    [Google Scholar]