Depth estimation of cavities from microgravity data using a new approach: the local linear model tree (LOLIMOT)

References

1. AbdelrahmanE.M., El‐ArabyT.M. and Abo‐EzzE.R.2001. Three least‐squares minimization approach to depth, shape, and amplitude coefficient determination from gravity data.Geophysics66, 1105–1109.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AdamsR.D., CollisterJ.W., EkartD.D., LeveyR.A. and NikraveshM.1999a. Evaluation of gas reservoirs in collapsed paleocave systems. AAPG Annual Meeting, 11–14 April, San Antonio, Texas, USA, Expanded Abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AdamsR.D., NikraveshM., EkartD.D., CollisterJ.W., LeveyR.A. and SiegfriedR.W.1999b. Optimization of well locations in complex carbonate reservoirs.GasTIPS5.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AminzadehF.1989. Future of expert systems in the oil industry. Proceedings of the HARC Conference on Geophysics and Computers. A Look at the Future.
   [Google Scholar]
5. AminzadehF. and ChatterjeeS.1984/1985. Applications of clustering in exploration seismology.Geoexploration23, 147–159.
   [Google Scholar]
6. AminzadehF. and JamshidiM.1995. Soft Computing. Prentice Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ArziA.A.1975. Microgravity for engineering applications.Geophysical Prospecting23, 408–425.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BeresM., LuetscherM. and OlivierR.2001. Integration of ground penetrating radar and microgravimetric methods to map shallow caves.Journal of Applied Geophysics46, 249–262.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BoulangerO. and ChouteauM.2001. Constraints in 3D gravity inversion.Geophysical Prospecting49, 265–280.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ButlerD.K.1984. Microgravimetric and gravity gradient techniques for detection of subsurface cavities.Geophysics49, 1084–1096.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ColleyG.C.1963. The detection of caves by gravity measurements.Geophysical Prospecting11, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ComachoA.G., VieiraR., MontesonosF.G. and CuellarV.1994. A gravimetric 3D global inversion for cavity detection.Geophysical Prospecting42, 113–130.
    [Google Scholar]
13. DebegliaN. and DupontF.2002. Some critical factors for engineering and environmental microgravity investigations.Journal of Applied Geophysics50, 435–454.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ElawadiE., SalemA. and UshijimaK.2001. Detection of cavities and tunnels from gravity data using a neural network.Exploration Geophysics32, 75–79.
    [Google Scholar]
15. FajklewiczZ.1986. Origin of the anomalies of gravity and its vertical gradient over cavities in brittle rock.Geophysical Prospecting4, 1233–1254.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GholipourA., AbbaspourA., AraabiB.N. and LucasC.2003. Enhancements in the prediction of solar activity by locally linear model tree. Proceedings of MIC2003, 22nd International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, Innsbruck, Austria, Expanded Abstracts, 158–161.
    [Google Scholar]
17. GrêtA. and KlingeléE.E.1998. Application of artificial neural networks for gravity interpretation in two dimensions.Eidgenössisiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammetric279.
    [Google Scholar]
18. GrêtA., KlingeléE.E. and KahleH.G. 2000. Application of artificial neural networks for gravity interpretation in two dimensions: A test study.Bollettino Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata41, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
19. GuptaO.P.1983. A least‐squares approach to depth determination from gravity data.Geophysics48, 357–360.
    [Google Scholar]
20. S.H.Ward
    HinzeW.J.1990. The role of gravity and magnetic methods in engineering and environmental studies. In: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. 1 (ed. S.H.Ward ), pp. 75–126. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
21. R.Murray‐Smith
    JohansenT.A. and Murray‐SmithR.1997. The operating regime approach to non‐linear modeling and control. In: Multiple Model Approaches to Modelling and Control (eds R.Murray‐Smith and T.A.Johansen ), pp. 3–72. Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KaraI. and KanliA.I.2005. Nomograms for interpretation of gravity anomalies of a vertical cylinder.Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society8, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LiX. and ChouteauM.1998. Three‐dimensional gravity modeling in all space. Surveys in Geophysics19, 339–368.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LiY. and OldenburgD.W.1998. 3‐D inversion of gravity data.Geophysics63, 109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mathworks
    Mathworks . 2008. MatlabR2008a Help Guide, www.mathworks.com
    [Google Scholar]
26. MohanN.L., AnandadabuL. and RoaS.1986. Gravity interpretation using Mellin transform.Geophysics52, 114–122.
    [Google Scholar]
27. R.Da
    NellesO.1997. Nonlinear system identification with neurofuzzy. In: Intelligent Hybrid Systems‐Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Genetic Algorithms (ed. R.Da ), pp. 283–310. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
28. NellesO.2001. Nonlinear Systems Identification. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. NettletonL.L.1942. Gravity and magnetic calculation.Geophysics7, 293–310.
    [Google Scholar]
30. NeumannR.1967. Lav gravimetrie de haute precision. Application aux recherches de cavités.Geophysical Prospecting15, 116–134.
    [Google Scholar]
31. NikraveshM. and AminzadehF.2003. Soft computing for intelligent reservoir characterization and modelling.Developments in Petroleum Science51, 3–32.
    [Google Scholar]
32. OdegardM.E. and BergJ.W.1965. Gravity interpretation using the Fourier integral.Geophysics30, 424–438.
    [Google Scholar]
33. OsmanO., AlboraA.M. and UcanO.N.2007. Forward modeling with forced neural networks for gravity anomaly profile.Mathematical Geology39, 593–605. doi:10.1007/s11004–007‐9114–8
    [Google Scholar]
34. PedramA., JamaliM.R., PedramT., FakhraieS.M. and LucasC.2006. Local linear model tree (LOLIMOT) reconfigurable parallel hardware.Transactions on Engineering Computing and Technology13, 96–101.
    [Google Scholar]
35. RaoB.S.R., Radhakrishna MurthyI.V. and Visweswara RaoC.1974. Gravity Interpretation by Characteristic Curves. Andhra University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MilletA.J. and SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution.Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SalemA., ElawadiE., AbdelazizA. and UshijimaK.2003. Imaging subsurface cavities from microgravity data using Hopfield neural network. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Recent Advances in Exploration Geophysics in Kyoto, RAEG2003, Expanded Abstracts, 199–205.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SharmaB. and GeldratL.P.1968. Analysis of gravity anomalies of two‐dimensional faults using Fourier transforms.Geophysical Prospecting16, 77–93.
    [Google Scholar]
39. ShawR.K. and AgarwalP.1990. The application of Walsh transforms to interpret gravity anomalies due to some simple geometrical shaped causative sources: A feasibility study. Geophysics55, 843–850.
    [Google Scholar]
40. SmithR.A.1959. Some depth formulate for local magnetic and gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting7, 55–63.
    [Google Scholar]
41. StylesP., McGrathR., ThomasE. and CassidyN.J.2005. The use of microgravity for cavity characterization in Karstic terrains.Quarterly Journal of Engineering and Hydrogeology38, 155–169.
    [Google Scholar]
42. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH – A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimations from magnetic data.Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
43. S.H.Ward
    WenjinL. and JiajianX.1990. Effectiveness of the high‐precision gravity method in detecting sinkholes in Taian Railway Station of Shangdong province. In: Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. 3 (ed. S.H.Ward ), pp. 169–174. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
44. YuleD.E., SharpM.K. and ButlerD.K.1998. Microgravity investigations of foundation conditions.Geophysics63, 95–103.
    [Google Scholar]
45. ZadehL.A.1965. Fuzzy sets.Information and Control8, 338–353.
    [Google Scholar]