1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 10, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The 1996 landslide near Finneidfjord, Norway, involved the displacement of c. 1 x 106 m3 of sediment. Failure initiated offshore and developed in a retrogressive manner, 100–150 m inland and removing a 250 m long section of the main north‐south highway. The landslide caused the loss of four human lives and may have been triggered by human activity (e.g., blasting for road works and/or placement of fill along the shore). Acquisition of an extensive and multidisciplinary data set, including high‐resolution swath bathymetry, 2D/3D seismic data, multiple short (up to 6 m) and two long (12 m and 14 m, respectively) sediment cores and Free‐Fall Piezocone Penetrometer (FF‐CPTU) profiles complemented with geotechnical laboratory data, has provided a detailed analysis of both the landslide morphology and stratigraphic controls. Using regional 2D parametric sub‐bottom profiler (TOPAS) profiles and a targeted decimetre‐resolution 3D Chirp seismic volume (950 m x 140 m), we focus on post‐failure material transport/deposition, correlating the failure plane against one of several regionally extensive packets of high‐amplitude, composite reflections. In seismic reflection data, the slide plane lies within a distinct, thin (< 0.5 m) stratigraphic bed of lower acoustic impedance than the background sedimentation (indicated by high amplitude reverse‐polarity top reflection), which is extensively deformed or completely scoured by motion of the overlying material. Within the body of the landslide, two different flow facies are identified. Inversion of these broadband (1.5–13.0 kHz) seismic data has allowed the calculation of remote physical properties (using acoustic quality factor, ), affording a depth and spatial assessment of the relationship between morphology and grain size. These remote physical properties are correlated against high‐resolution geotechnical data from core logs and FF‐CPTU profiles, identifying the slide plane as a weak, laminated, clay‐rich bed. This combined geophysical/geotechnical assessment of the landslide morphology and internal architecture supports previous work indicating a complex, multi‐stage failure. These combined data illustrate how seafloor stability is strongly influenced by a shallow subsurface structure, with geotechnical properties and lateral continuity of stratified beds acting as a primary control on slide plane depth and failure probability.

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2012 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-2012022
2012-04-01
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-2012022
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BestA.I., ClaytonC.R.I., LongvaO. and SzumanM.2003. The role of free gas in the activation of submarine slides in Finneidfjord. In: Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences (eds J.Locat and MienertJ. ), pp. 491–498. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BrynP., BergK., SolheimK., KvalstadT.J. and ForsbergC.F.2005. Explaining the Storegga Slide.Marine and Petroleum Geology22, 11–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BullJ., GutowskiM., DixJ., HenstockT., HogarthP., LeightonT. and WhiteP.2005. Design of a 3D Chirp sub‐bottom imaging system.Marine Geophysical Researches26, 157–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CanalsM., et al.2004. Slope failure dynamics and impacts from seafloor and shallow sub‐ seafloor geophysical data: Case studies from the COSTA project.Marine Geology213, 9–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. GregersenO.1999. Kvikkleireskredet i Finneidfjord 20 juni 1996. NGI Rep 980005–1, NGI, Oslo.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GuignéJ.Y., PaceN.G. and ChinV.H.1989. Dynamic extraction of sediment attenuation from subbottom acoustic data.Journal of Geophysical Research94, 5745–5755.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GutowskiM., BullJ.M., DixJ.K., HenstockT.J., HogarthP., HillerT., LeightonT.G. and WhiteP.R.2008. 3D high‐resolution acoustic imaging of the sub‐seabed. Applied Acoustics 69(5), 412–421.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HamiltonE.1972. Compressional wave attenuation in marine sediments.Geophysics37, 620–646.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HansenL., L’HeureuxJ.‐S. and LongvaO.2011. Turbiditic, clay‐rich event beds in fjord‐marine deposits caused by landslides in emerging clay deposits – Palaeoenvironmental interpretation and role for submarine mass‐wasting.Sedimentology58(4), 890–915.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. JanbuN.1996. Raset I Finneidfjord – 20 juni 1996. Unpublished expert’s report prepared for the County Sheriff of Nordland.Report Number 1, Revision 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KvalstadT.J., AndresenL., ForsbergC.F., BergK., BrynP. and WangenM.2005. The Storegga slide: Evaluation of triggering sources and slide mechanics.Marine and Petroleum Geology22, 245–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LastrasG., CanalsM., UrgelesR., Hughes‐ClarkeJ.E. and AcostaJ.2004. Shallow slides and pockmark swarms in the Eivissa Channel, western Mediterranean Sea.Sedimentology51, 1–14
     [Google Scholar]
  13. L’HeureuxJ.-S., HansenL. and LongvaO.2009. Development of the submarine channel at the mouth of the Nidelva River, Trondheimsfjorden, Norway.Marine Geology260, 30–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. L’HeureuxJ.-S., HansenL., LongvaO., EmdalA. and GrandeL.2010. A multidisciplinary study of submarine landslides at the Nidelva fjord delta, Central Norway – Implications for geohazards assessments.Norwegian Journal of Geology90, 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. L’HeureuxJ.-S., et al.2012. Identification of weak layers and their role for the stability of slopes at Finneidfjord, northern Norway. In: Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research (eds Y.Yamada et al.), p. 31. Springer Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LongvaO., JanbuN., BlikraL.H. and BoeR.2003. The 1996 Finneidfjord slide: Seafloor failure and slide dynamics. In: Submarine Mass Movements and their Consequences (eds LocatJ. and MienertJ. ), pp. 531–538. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. LunneT., RobertsonP.K. and PowellJ.J.M.1997. Cone Penetration Testing In Geotechnical Practise. p 312. Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MassonD.G., HarbitzC.B., WynnR.B., PedersenG. and LøvholtF.2006. Submarine Landslides – Processes, triggers and hazard prediction.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonA 364, 2009–2039.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MassonD.G., WynnR.B. and TallingP.J.2010. Large landslides on passive continental margins: Processes, hypotheses and outstanding questions. In: Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, Vol. 28 (eds D.C.Mosher et al.). Springer Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. MorganE., VannesteM., LecomteI., BaiseL.G., LongvaO. and McAdooB.Estimation of free gas saturation from seismic reflection surveys by the genetic algorithm inversion of a P‐wave attenuation model.In Press, Geophysics.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MorganE., VannesteM., LongvaO., LecomteI., McAdooB. and BaiseL.2009. Evaluating gas‐generated pore pressure with seismic reflection data in a landslide‐prone area: An example from Finneidfjord, Norway. In: Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, Vol. 28 (eds D.C.Mosher et al.). Springer Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. O’LearyD.W.1991. Structure and morphology of submarine slab slides: Clues to origin and behavior.Mar. Geotech.10, 53–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. OlsenL., SveianH. and BergstromB.2001. Rapid adjustments of the Western Part of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet during the Mid and Late Wiechselian: A new model.Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift81, 93–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. OlsenL., SveianH. and BlikraL.H.1996. KORGEN 1927 II.Quaternary map – M: 1:50 000, with description.Geological Survey of Norway.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. OlsenL., SveianH. and VatneG.2006. Trondheim Region Field Guide.ESF Sediflux and IAG/AIG Sedibud Excursion 01.11.2006, 24 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. PinsonL.J.W., HenstockT.J., DixJ.K. and BullJ.M.2008. Estimating quality factor and mean grain size of sediments from high‐resolution marine seismic data.Geophysics73(4), G19–G28.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RosenquistI.T.1953. Considerations on the sensitivity of Norwegian quick‐clays.Geotechnique3, 195–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ShumwayG.1960. Sound speed and absorption studies of marine sediments by a resonance method.Geophysics25, 451–467.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SteinerA., L’HeureuxJ.S., LongvaO., LangeM., VannesteM., HaflidasonH. and KopfA.2012. An in‐situ free‐fall piezocone penetrometer for characterizing soft and sensitive clays at Finneidfjord, northern Norway. In: Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, 29 (eds Y.Yamada et al.). Spinger, Dordrecht (The Netherlands).
     [Google Scholar]
  30. St‐OngeG., MulderT., PiperD.J.W., Hilaire‐MarcelC. and StonerJ.S.2004. Earthquake and flood‐induced turbidites in the Saguenay Fjord (Québec): A Holocene paleoseismicity record.Quaternary Science Reviews23, 283–294.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. VannesteM., L’HeureuxJ.-S., BrendryenJ., BaetenN., LabergJ.S., VardyM.E.et al.2012. Assessing offshore geohazards: A multi‐disciplinary research initiative to understand shallow landslides and their dynamics in coastal and deepwater environments, Norway. In: Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, 29 (eds Y.Yamada et al.). Spinger, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. VardyM.E., BullJ.M., DixJ.K., HenstockT.J., PletsR.M.K., GutowskiM. and HogarthP.2011. The geological ‘Hubble’: A reappraisal for shallow water.The Leading Edge (2), 154–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. VardyM.E. and HenstockT.J.2010. A frequency approximated approach to Kirchhoff migration.Geophysics75(6), S211–S218.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. VardyM.E., PinsonL.J.W., BullJ.M., DixJ.K., HenstockT.J., DavisJ.W. and GutowskiM.2010. 3D seismic imaging of buried Younger Dryas mass movement flows: Lake Windermere, UK.Geomorphology118(1–2), 176–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. WidessM.B.1973. How thin is a thin bed?Geophysics38, 1176–1180.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. WilsonC.K., LongD. and BulatJ., 2004. The morphology, setting and processes of the Afen slide.Marine Geology213, 149–167.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-2012022
Loading
Multidisciplinary investigation of a shallow near‐shore landslide, Finneidfjord, Norway
Near Surface Geophysics 10, 267 (2012); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-2012022
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-2012022
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-2012022
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error