1887
Volume 60, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Wide‐angle seismic data acquired by use of air‐guns and ocean bottom seismometers (OBS) contain strong direct water arrivals and multiples, generally considered as noise and thus not included in the modelling. However, a recent study showed that standard ray‐tracing modelling of the water multiples recorded off the Bear Island, North Atlantic, provided a reliable estimate of the velocity distribution in the water layer. Here, we demonstrate that including the amplitudes in the modelling provide valuable information about the contrast at the seafloor, as well as the ratio and attenuation () of the uppermost sediments. The contrast at the seafloor is estimated at about 250 m/s, within a precision of approximately ±30 m/s. The ratio in the uppermost sedimentary layer is modelled in the range 2.25–2.50 and the factor is estimated at 1000 for the water, 30–50 for the uppermost layer and 40–50 for the second sedimentary layer. The values obtained for the sediments suggest a lithology dominated by silty clays, with porosity below average.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01022.x
2011-12-20
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbercrombieR.E.1997. Near‐surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America87(3), 731–744.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AinslieM.A. and McColmJ.G.1998. A simplified formula for viscous and chemical absorption in sea water. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America103(3), 1671–1672.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AmundsenL. and ReitanA.1995. Estimation of sea‐floor wave velocities and density from pressure and particle velocity by AVO analysis. Geophysics60(5), 1575–1578.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AttewellP.B. and RamanaY.V.1966. Wave attenuation and internal friction as functions of frequency in rocks. Geophysics31(6), 1049–1056.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AyresA. and TheilenF.2001. Preliminary laboratory investigations into attenuation of compressional and shear waves on near‐surface marine sediments. Geophysical Prospecting49, 120–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BestA.I., McCannC. and SothcottJ.1994. The relationships between the velocities, attenuations and petrophysical properties of reservoir sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Prospecting42(2), 151–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ČervenýV. and PšenčíkI.1983. 2‐D seismic ray tracing package SEIS83 (software package). Charles University, Prague .
  8. ChapmanM.C., BealeJ.N. and CatchingsR.D.2008. Q for P waves in the sediments of the Virginia Coastal Plain. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America98(4), 2022–2032, doi:10.1785/0120070170.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CornuelleB., WunschC., BehringerD., BirdsallT., BrownM., HeinmillerR. et al . 1985. Tomographic maps of the ocean mesoscale. Part 1: Pure acoustic. Journal of Physical Oceanography15, 133–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CzubaW., GradM., MjeldeR., GuterchA., LibakA., KrügerF. et al . 2011. Continent–ocean‐transition across a trans‐tensional margin segment: Off Bear Island, Barents Sea. Geophysical Journal International184, 541–554, doi:10.1111/j.1365–246X.2010.04873.x
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DaintyA.M.1981. A scattering model to explain seismic Q observations in the lithosphere between 1 and 30 Hz. Geophysical Research Letters8(11), 1126–1128.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DasguptaR. and ClarkR.A.1998. Estimation of Q from surface seismic reflection data. Geophysics63(6), 2120–2128.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DossoS.E. and BrookeG.H.1995. Measurement of seismo‐acoustic ocean‐bottom properties in the high Arctic. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America98(3), 1657–1666.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FaleideJ.I., TsikalasF., BreivikA.J., MjeldeR., RitzmannO., EngenØ. et al . 2008. Structure and evolution of the continental margin off Norway and the Barents Sea. Episodes31(1), 82–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. FisherF.H. and SimmonsV.P.1977. Sound absorption in seawater. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America62, 558–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FrancoisR.E. and GarrisonG.R.1982a. Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America72(3), 896–907.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. FrancoisR.E. and GarrisonG.R.1982b. Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part II: Boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America72(6), 1879–1890.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GabrielsenR.H., FærsethR.B., JensenL.N., KalheimJ.E. and RiisF.1990. Structural elements of the Norwegian continental shelf, Part I: The Barents Sea Region. NPD-Bulletin No6, 1–33, Oljedirektoratet.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GradM. and LuostoU.1994. Seismic velocities and Q‐factors in the uppermost crust beneath the SVEKA profile in Finland. Tectonophysics230, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GradM., MjeldeR., CzubaW., GuterchA., SchweitzerJ. and the IPY Project Group . 2011. Modelling of seafloor multiples observed in OBS data from the North Atlantic ‐ new seismic tool for oceanography?Polish Polar Research32(4), 405–422, doi:10.2478/v10183‐011‐0027‐3.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GusmeroliA., ClarkR.A., MurrayT., BoothA.D., KulessaB. and BarretB.E.2010. Seismic wave attenuation in the uppermost glacier ice of Storglaciären, Sweden. Journal of Glaciology56(196), 249–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HamiltonE.1979. Vp/Vs and Poisson's ratios in marine sediments and rocks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America66(4), 1093–1101.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. JakobssonM., CherkisN.Z., WoodwardJ., MacnabR. and CoakleyB.2000. New grid of Arctic bathymetry aids scientists and mapmakers. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union81(9), 89, 93, 96.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KinslerL.E., FreyA.R., CoppensA.B. and SandersJ.V.1982. Fundamentals of Acoustics . Third Edition, Wiley, New York .
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LangstonC.A., BodinP., PowellC., WithersM., HortonS. and MooneyW.2005. Bulk Sediment Qp and Qs in the Mississippi Embayment, Central United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(6), 2162–2179.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MjeldeR., BreivikA.J., RaumT., MittelstaedtE., ItoG. and FaleideJ.I.2008. Magmatic and tectonic evolution of the North Atlantic. Journal of the Geological Society165, 31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MohiuddinM.A., KorvinG., AbdulraheemA. and KhanK.2001. Attenuation characteristics of Saudi Arabian reservoir sandstone and limestone cores. Society of Core Analysts SCA‐2001–57, 2001 International symposium proceedings, CD‐ROM, 5 p.
  28. RossiG., GeiD., BöhmG., MadrussaniG. and CarcioneJ.M.2007. Attenuation tomography: An application to gas‐hydrate and free‐gas detection. Geophysical Prospecting55, 655–669.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SchweitzerJ., GuterchA., KrügerF., Schmidt‐AurschM., MjeldeR., GradM. and FaleideJ.2008. The IPY Project 77 – The dynamic continental margin between the Mid‐Atlantic‐Ridge system (Mohns Ridge, Knipovich Ridge) and the Bear Island Region, in the 33rd International Geological Congress, Oslo, 6–14 August 2008, CD‐ROM Proceedings.
  30. ToksözM.N., DaintyA.M., ReiterE. and WuR.S.1988. A model for attenuation and scattering in the Earth's crust. Pure and Applied Geophysics128(1/2), 81–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ToksözM.N., MandalB. and DaintyA.M.1990. Frequency dependent attenuation in the crust. Geophysical Research Letters17(7), 973–976.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WalczowskiW.2009. Atlantic Water in the Nordic Seas – properties, variability, climatic significance. Rozprawy i monografie IO PAN, Sopot, 244 (in Polish with English summary).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01022.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01022.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acoustics; Attenuation; Modelling; Velocity analysis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error