High‐accuracy practical spline‐based 3D and 2D integral transformations in potential‐field geophysics

References

1. AbersG.A., FerrisA., CraigM., DaviesH., Lerner‐LamA.L., MutterJ.C. and TaylorB.2002. Mantle compensation of active metamorphic core complexes at Woodlark rift in Papua New Guinea. Nature418, 862–865.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AllenD.J. and HinzeW.J.1992. Wisconsin gravity minimum: Solution of a geologic and geophysical puzzle and implications for cratonic evolution. Geology20, 515–518.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BehrendtJ.C., MeisterL. and HendersonJ.R.1966. Airborne geophysical study in the Pensacola Mountains of Antarctica. Science153, 1373–1376.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BektaşO., RavatD., BüyüksaraçA., BİlİmF. and AteşA.2007. Regional geothermal characterisation of east Anatolia from aeromagnetic, heat flow and gravity data. Pure Applied Geophysics164, 975–998.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BerrinoG., CorradoG. and RiccardiU.2008. Sea gravity data in the Gulf of Naples. A contribution to delineating the structural pattern of the Phlegraean Volcanic District. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research175, 241–252.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BlakelyR.J.1996. Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications . Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BlakelyR.J. and SimpsonR.W.1986. Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics51, 1494–1498.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blanco‐MontenegroI., GonzalezF.M., GarciaA., VieiraR. and VillalainJ.J.2005. Paleomagnetic determinations on Lanzarote from magnetic and gravity anomalies: Implications for the early history of the Canary Islands. Journal of Geophysical Research110, B1 2102, 1–9.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BosumW., CastenU., FiebergF.C., HeydeI. and SoffelH.C.1997. Three‐dimensional interpretation of the KTB gravity and magnetic anomalies. Journal of Geophysical Research102(B8),18307–18321.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BracewellR.N.1965. The Fourier transform and its applications . McGraw‐Hill Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
11. EEZ Working Group
    CarbóA., Muñoz‐MartÍnA., LlanesP., ÁlvarezJ. and EEZ Working Group . 2003. Gravity analysis offshore the Canary Islands from a systematic survey. Marine Geophysical Research24, 113–127.
    [Google Scholar]
12. CochranJ.R., FornariD.J., CoakleyB.J., HerrR. and TiveyM.A.1999. Continuous near‐bottom gravity measurements made with a BGM‐3 gravimeter in DSV Alvin on the East Pacific Rise crest near 9°3 1′N and 9°50′N. Journal of Geophysical Research104(B5),10841–10861.
    [Google Scholar]
13. FischerK.M.2002. Waning buoyancy in the crustal roots of old mountains. Nature417, 933–936.
    [Google Scholar]
14. FitzGeraldD., ReidA. and McInerneyP.2004. New discrimination techniques for Euler deconvolution. Computers & Geosciences30, 461–469.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GrauchV.J.S. and CordellL.1987. Limitations of determining density or magnetic boundaries from the horizontal gradient of gravity or pseudogravity data. Geophysics52, 118–121.
    [Google Scholar]
16. HansenR.O. and SuciuL.2002. Multiple‐source Euler deconvolution. Geophysics67, 525–535.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HebertH., DeplusC., HuchonP., KhanbariK. and AudinL.2001. Lithospheric structure of a nascent spreading ridge inferred from gravity data: The western Gulf of Aden. Journal of Geophysical Research106(B11), 26345–26363.
    [Google Scholar]
18. JallouliC., MickusK.L. and TurkiM.M.2002. Gravity constrains on the structure of the northern margin of Tunisia: Implications on the nature of the northern African Plate boundary. Geophysical Journal International151, 117–131.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KostoglodoV., BandyW., DominguezJ. and MenaM.1996. Gravity and seismicity over the Guerrero seismic gap, Mexico. Geophysical Research Letters23, 3385–3388.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MartinezF., GoodliffeA.M. and TaylorB.2001. Metamorphic core complex formation by density inversion and lower‐crust extrusion. Nature411, 930–934.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MickusK.L. and HinojosaJ.H.2001. The complete gravity gradient tensor derived from the vertical component of gravity: A Fourier transform technique. Journal of Applied Geophysics46, 159–174.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MickusK., TadesseK., KellerG.R. and OlumaB.2007. Gravity analysis of the main Ethiopian rift. Journal of African Earth Sciences48, 59–69.
    [Google Scholar]
23. NabighianM.N.1972. The analytic signal of two‐dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross‐section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics37, 507–517.
    [Google Scholar]
24. NabighianM.N.1974. Additional comments on the analytic signal with two‐dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross‐section. Geophysics39, 85–92.
    [Google Scholar]
25. NabighianM.N.1984. Toward a three‐dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations. Geophysics49, 780–786.
    [Google Scholar]
26. NabighianM.N., AnderM.E., GrauchV.J.S., HansenR.O., LaFehrT.R., LiY. et al . 2005b. Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics70, 63ND–89ND.
    [Google Scholar]
27. NabighianM.N., GrauchV.J.S., HansenR.O., LaFehrT.R., LiY., PeirceJ.W. et al . 2005a. The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics70, 33ND–61ND.
    [Google Scholar]
28. NabighianM.N. and HansenR.O.2001. Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalized Hilbert transform. Geophysics66, 1805–1810.
    [Google Scholar]
29. NelsonJ.B.1986. An alternative derivation of the three‐dimensional Hilbert transform relations from first principles. Geophysics51, 1014–1015.
    [Google Scholar]
30. PuruckerM., SabakaT., LeG., SlavinJ.A., StrangewayR.J. and BusbyC.2007. Magnetic field gradients from the ST‐5 constellation: Improving magnetic and thermal models of the lithosphere. Geophysical Research Letters34, L24306.
    [Google Scholar]
31. RavatD.1996. Analysis of the Euler method and its applicability in environmental magnetic investigations. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics1, 229–238.
    [Google Scholar]
32. RavatD., WangB., WildermuthE. and TaylorP.T.2002. Gradients in the interpretation of satellite‐altitude magnetic data: An example from central Africa. Journal of Geodynamics33, 131–142.
    [Google Scholar]
33. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MillettA.J. and SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
34. RicardY. and BlakelyR.J.1988. A method to minimize edge effects in two‐dimensional discrete Fourier transforms. Geophysics53, 1113–1117.
    [Google Scholar]
35. SandwellD.T. and SmithW.H.F.1997. Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research102(B5), 10039–10054.
    [Google Scholar]
36. ThomasM.D., GrieveR.A.F. and SharptonV.L.1988. Gravity domains and assembly of the North American continent by collisional tectonics. Nature331, 333–334.
    [Google Scholar]
37. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47, 31–37.
    [Google Scholar]
38. WangY.M.2000. Predicting bathymetry from the Earth's gravity gradient anomalies. Marine Geodesy23, 251–258.
    [Google Scholar]
39. WangB.2006. 2D and 3D potential‐field upward continuation using splines. Geophysical Prospecting54, 199–209.
    [Google Scholar]
40. WangB., KrebesE.S. and RavatD.2008. High‐precision potential field and gradient component transformations and derivative computations using cubic B‐splines. Geophysics73, I35–I42.
    [Google Scholar]
41. WesselP. and SmithW.H.F.1995. New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released. AGU Eos Transactions76, 329.
    [Google Scholar]