A central difference method with low numerical dispersion for solving the scalar wave equation

References

1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods . W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco , CA .
   [Google Scholar]
2. AlfordR.M., KellyK.R. and BooreD.M.1974. Accuracy of finite‐difference modelling of the acoustic wave equation. Geophysics39, 834–842.
   [Google Scholar]
3. AppeloD. and PeterssonN.A.2009. A stable finite‐difference method for the elastic wave equation on complex geometries with free surfaces. Communications in Computational Physics5, 84–107.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BlanchJ.O. and RobertssonA.1997. A modified Lax‐Wendroff correction for wave propagation in media described by Zener elements. Geophysical Journal International131, 381–386.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DablainM.A.1986. The application of high‐order differencing to scalar wave equation. Geophysics51, 54–66.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DuS.T.1997. Seismic Waves Dynamics. Petroleum University Press, Shandong , China (in Chinese).
   [Google Scholar]
7. FornbergB.1990. High‐order finite‐differences and pseudo‐spectral method on staggered grids. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis27, 904–918.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GellerR.J. and TakeuchiN.1998. Optimally accurate second‐order time‐domain finite‐difference scheme for the elastic equation of motion: One‐dimensional case. Geophysical Journal International135, 48–62.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HigdonR.L.1991. Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves. Geophysics56, 231–241.
   [Google Scholar]
10. IgelH., MoraP. and RiolletB.1995. Anisotropic wave propagation through finite‐difference grids. Geophysics60, 1203–1216.
    [Google Scholar]
11. KellyK., WardR., TreitelS. and AlfordR.1976. Synthetic seismograms: A finite‐difference approach. Geophysics41, 2–27.
    [Google Scholar]
12. KolsloffD. and BaysalE.1982. Forward modelling by a Fourier method. Geophysics56, 231–241.
    [Google Scholar]
13. LaxP.D. and WendroffB.1964. Difference schemes for hyperbolic equations with high order of accuracy. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics17, 381–398.
    [Google Scholar]
14. LeleS.K.1992. Compact finite‐difference schemes with spectral‐like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics103, 16–42.
    [Google Scholar]
15. LisitsaV. and VishnevskiyD.2010. Lebedev scheme for the numerical simulation of wave propagation in 3D anisotropic elasticity. Geophysical Prospecting58, 619–635.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LiuE., DobsonA., PanD.M. and YangD.H.2008. The matrix formulation of boundary integral modelling of elastic wave propagation in 2D multi‐layered media with irregular interfaces. Journal of Computational Acoustics16, 381–396.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MarfurtK.J.1984. Accuracy of finite‐difference and finite‐element modelling of the scalar and elastic wave equations. Geophysics49, 533–549.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MattssonK. and NordströmJ.2006. High order finite‐difference methods for wave propagation in discontinuous media. Journal of Computational Physics220, 249–269.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MizutaniH., GellerR.J. and TakeuchiN.2000. Comparison of accuracy and efficiency of time‐domain schemes for calculating synthetic seismograms. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors119, 75–97.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MoczoP., KristekJ. and HaladaL.2000. 3D fourth‐order staggered‐grid finite‐difference schemes: Stability and grid dispersion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 587–603.
    [Google Scholar]
21. MoczoP., KristekJ., VavrycukV., ArchuletaR.J. and HaladaL.2002. 3D heterogeneous staggered‐grid finite‐difference modelling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic modulus and densities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 3042–3066.
    [Google Scholar]
22. MoczoP., RobertssonJ.O.A. and EisnerL.2007. The finite‐difference time‐domain method for modelling of seismic wave propagation. Advances in Geophysics48, 421–516.
    [Google Scholar]
23. RobertssonJ.O.A., BlanchJ.O. and SymesW.W.1994. Viscoelastic finite‐difference modelling. Geophysics59, 1444–1456.
    [Google Scholar]
24. SaengerE.H. and BohlenT.2004. Finite‐difference modelling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid. Geophysics69, 583–591.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SaengerE.H., GoldN. and ShapiroS.A.2000. Modelling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite‐difference grid. Wave Motion31, 77–92.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SantosaF. and PaoY.H.1986. Accuracy of a Lax‐Wendroff scheme for the wave equation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America80, 1429–1437.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SeiA. and SymesW.1994. Dispersion analysis of numerical wave propagation and its computational consequences. Journal of Scientific Computing10, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
28. TakeuchiN. and GellerR.J.2000. Optimally accurate second order time‐domain finite‐difference scheme for computing synthetic seismograms in 2‐D and 3‐D media. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors119, 99–131.
    [Google Scholar]
29. VersteegR.J. and GrauG.1991. The Marmousi experience. Proceedings of the EAGE workshop on Practical Aspects of Seismic Data Inversion (Copenhagen, 1990), European Assocication of Exploration Geophysicists, Zeist .
30. VichnevetskyR.1979. Stability charts in the numerical approximation of partial differential equations: A review. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation21, 170–177.
    [Google Scholar]
31. VirieuxJ.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
32. YangD.H., LiuE. and ZhangZ.J.2008. Evaluation of the u‐W finite element method in anisotropic porous media. Journal of Seismic Exploration17, 273–299.
    [Google Scholar]
33. YangD.H., LiuE., ZhangZ.J. and TengJ.2002. Finite‐difference modelling in two‐dimensional anisotropic media using a flux‐corrected transport technique. Geophysical Journal International148, 320–328.
    [Google Scholar]
34. YangD.H., PengJ.M., LuM. and TerlakyT.2006. Optimal nearly‐analytic discrete approximation to the scalar wave equation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America96, 1114–1130.
    [Google Scholar]
35. YangD.H., SongG.J., HuaB.L. and CalandraH.2010. Simulation of acoustic wave‐fields in heterogeneous media: A robust method for automatic suppression of numerical dispersion. Geophysics75, T99–T110.
    [Google Scholar]
36. YangD.H., TengJ.W., ZhangZ.J. and LiuE.2003a. A nearly‐analytic discrete method for acoustic and elastic wave equations in anisotropic media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 882–890.
    [Google Scholar]
37. YangD.H., WangL. and DengX.Y.2010. An explicit split‐step algorithm of the implicit Adams method for solving 2‐D acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysical Journal International180, 291–310.
    [Google Scholar]
38. YangD.H., WangS.Q., ZhangZ.J. and TengJ.W.2003b. n‐times absorbing boundary conditions for compact finite‐difference modelling of acoustic and elastic wave propagation in the 2‐D TI Medium. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America93, 2389–2401.
    [Google Scholar]
39. ZengY.Q. and LiuQ.H.2001. A staggered‐grid finite‐difference method with perfectly matched layers for poroelastic wave equations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America109, 2571–2580.
    [Google Scholar]
40. ZhangZ.J., WangG.J. and HarrisJ M.1999. Multi‐component wave‐field simulation in viscous extensively dilatancy anisotropic media. Physics of Earth and Planetary Interiors114, 25–38.
    [Google Scholar]
41. ZhengH.S., ZhangZ.J. and LiuE.2006. Non‐linear seismic wave propagation in anisotropic media using the flux‐corrected transport technique. Geophysical Journal International165, 943–956.
    [Google Scholar]