1887
Volume 60, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Harmonic or subharmonic noise is often present in vibroseis data as reverberation‐like, laterally coherent bands occurring parallel to and before or after, the main events. Such periodic noise is typically generated during the standard correlation process when the actual source signal travelling through the subsurface is, for whatever reason, different from the desired source signal, i.e., the pilot‐sweep controlling the baseplate and used for correlation. A typical cause can be that harmonic or subharmonic frequency partials are generated in addition to the vibroseis sweep's desired fundamental frequencies. These harmonics produce strong ‘ghost events’ during correlation of the geophone trace with the pilot‐sweep, originating from additional correlations between the fundamental and harmonic frequencies. Especially subharmonic ‘ghosts’ will overlap with ‘good’ fundamental signals, since for typically used up‐sweeps they are folded to later traveltimes, where the signal/noise‐ratio is already lower, thus aggravating or preventing a reliable interpretation of possible later reflections.

Here, a method is introduced to remove these unwanted noise trains (with only negligible impact on the fundamental signal) by transforming the seismogram traces into a so‐called ‘(sub)harmonic domain’. In this domain, the respective harmonic noise portions are focused and separated from the fundamental signals, enabling easier detection and appropriate suppression. After back‐transformation to the x‐T domain, the records are free from the corresponding harmonic contamination and can then be processed as usual. The method operates in a data‐driven fashion, i.e., the traces are not uniformly processed but are processed depending upon their actual (sub)harmonic content. The decontamination procedure can be applied universally, i.e., to uncorrelated/correlated and/or vertically unstacked/stacked data either in a manual, semiautomated or fully automated manner. The method works perfectly for synthetic vibroseis traces with or without harmonic/subharmonic portions. The application to real, crustal‐scale vibroseis records that were acquired in 2006 in the Dead Sea region, Israel and that were severely contaminated by subharmonic ground‐roll ghosts covering reflectivity from the basement to the Moho, shows the robustness and success of the presented method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01034.x
2012-01-31
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BagainiC.2010. Acquisition and processing of simultaneous vibroseis data. Geophysical Prospecting 58(1), 81–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BoucardD. and OllivrinG.2010. Developments in vibrator control. Geophysical Prospecting 58(1), 33–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CooperN.M.2002. Vibroseis – A counter‐intuitive tool. CSEG convention ‘Taking exploration to the edge’, Expanded Abstracts, 3 pages.
  4. DESERT Group
    DESERT Group , M.Weber et al . 2004. The crustal structure of the Dead Sea Transform. Geophysical Journal International 156, 655–681.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KrohnC., JohnsonM., HoR. and NorrisM.2010. Vibroseis productivity: Shake and go. Geophysical Prospecting 58(1), 101–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LebedevA.V. and BeresnevI.A.2004. Nonlinear distortion of signals radiated by vibroseis sources. Geophysics 69(4), 968–977.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LiX.‐P., SoellnerW. and HubralP.1995. Elimination of harmonic distortion in vibroseis data. Geophysics 60(2), 503–516.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MartinF.D. and MunozP.A.2010. Deharmonics, a Method for Harmonic Noise Removal on Vibroseis Data. Expanded Abstracts, 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 5 pages.
  9. MartinJ.E. and WhiteR.E.1989. Two methods for continuous monitoring of harmonic distortion in vibroseis signals. Geophysical Prospecting 37(7), 851–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MechieJ., Abu‐AyyashK., Ben‐AvrahamZ., El‐KelaniR., QabbaniI., WeberM. and DESIRE group . 2009. Crustal structure of the southern Dead Sea basin derived from project DESIRE wide‐angle seismic data. Geophysical Journal International 178, 457–478, doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2009.04161.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. OkayaA.D., KarageorgiE. and McEvillyT.V.1992. Removing vibrator‐induced correlation artifacts by filtering in frequency‐uncorrelated time space. Geophysics 57(7), 916–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PolomU.1997. Elimination of source‐generated noise from correlated vibroseis data (the ‘ghost sweep’ problem). Geophysical Prospecting 45(4), 571–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RietschE.1981. Reduction of harmonic distortion in vibratrory source records. Geophysical Prospecting 29(2), 178–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SallasJ.J.1984. Seismic vibratror control and the downgoing P‐wave. Geophysics 49(6), 732–744.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SallasJ.J.2010. How do hydraulic vibrators work? A look inside the black box. Geophysical Prospecting 58(1), 3–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SaragiotisC., ScholtzP. and BagainiC.2010. On the accuracy of the ground force estimated in vibroseis acquisition. Geophysical Prospecting 58(1), 69–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ScholtzP.2002. Amplitude analysis of harmonics on vibrator‐generated direct waves. 64th EAGE conference, Expanded Abstract P083.
  18. SeriffA.J. and KimW.H.1970. The effect of harmonic distortion in the use of vibratory surface sources. Geophysics 35(2), 234–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. StillerM., JaeckelK.H., StierF. and DESIRE group . 2007. Efficient Removal of (Sub)Harmonic Ghost Events from Vibroseis Data. Expanded Abstract, 69th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 4 pages.
  20. WalkerD.1995. Harmonic response structure and chaotic dynamics in the earth‐vibrator system. Geophysical Prospecting 43(4), 487–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WeiZ., SallasJ.J., CrowellJ.M. and TeskeJ.E.2007. Harmonic distortion reduction on vibrators – Suppressing the supply pressure ripples. SEG conference, Expanded Abstract 26(1), 51–55.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01034.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01034.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dead Sea; Digital filters; Harmonic distortions; Seismic data acquisition; Vibroseis

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error